Assessing and Comparing Data Sources for Terrorism Research
- 1.5k Downloads
Until recently, much of the research on terrorism was theoretical, based on small-n studies. The growing availability of large-n terrorism databases has provided great opportunities for terrorism researchers to identify cases and test and develop new hypotheses that are relevant to the field. But how good is the quality of the data in these databases? And how should the researcher go about choosing between competing databases? This chapter describes the need for a framework to evaluate the quality of terrorism data. Drawing on the concept of a “criterial framework” and “best practice” criterial standards developed to bridge qualitative/quantitative and small-n/large-n divides, the chapter also proposes a set of criteria to evaluate terrorism data and uses these criteria to evaluate and compare a series of quantitative terrorism events databases.
KeywordsTerrorist Event Terrorist Incident Suicide Attack Terrorism Data Global Terrorism
- Brady, H. E., & Collier, D. (2004). Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse tools, shared standards. Berkeley: Rowman & Littlefield and Berkeley Public Policy Press.Google Scholar
- Collier, D., Brady, H. E., & Seawright, J. (2004). Sources of leverage in causal inference: Toward an alternative view of methodology. In H. Brady & D. Collier (Eds.), Rethinking social inquiry: Diverse tools, shared standards (pp. 229–266). Berkeley: Rowman & Littlefield and Berkeley Public Policy Press.Google Scholar
- Drakos, K. (2009). Security economics: A guide for data availability and needs. Economics of Security Working Paper 6, Berlin: Economics of Security. Retrieved July 29, 2011 from https://www.diw.de/documents/publikationen/73/diw_01.c.94892.de/diw_econsec0006.pdf.
- Engene, J. O. (2006). TWEED code book. Bergen: University of Bergen: Department of Comparative Politics.Google Scholar
- Fowler, W. W. (1981). Terrorism data bases: A comparison of missions methods, and systems. Retrieved July 29, 2011 from http://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/notes/2005/N1503.pdf.
- Gerring, J. (2001). Social Science Methodology: A criterial framework. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Gerring, J. (2010). Social science methodology: Tasks, strategies, criteria. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Goertz, G. (2005). Social Science Concepts: A user’s guide. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Guba, E. (1981). Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries. Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 29(2), 75–91.Google Scholar
- Herman, E. S., & Chomsky, N. (1988). Manufacturing Consent. New York, NY: Pantheon.Google Scholar
- Jenkins, B., & Johnson, J. (1975). International Terrorism: A chronology, 1968–1974. Santa Monica: Rand Corporation.Google Scholar
- Krueger, A. B., & Laitin, D. D. (2004, May 17). Faulty terror report card. Washington Post, p. A21.Google Scholar
- Krueger, A. B., & Laitin, D. D. (2004). Misunderestimating terrorism. Foreign Affairs. Retrieved July 29, 2011 from http://www.krueger.princeton.edu/terrorism1.html.
- La Free, G. L. (2010). The global terrorism database: Accomplishments and challenges. Perspectives on Terrorism, IV(1), 24–46.Google Scholar
- La Free, G. L. (2011). Generating terrorism event data bases: Results from the global terrorism database, 1970–2008, College Park, MD: University of Maryland.Google Scholar
- Lazarsfeld, P., & Barfeld, A. H. (1951). Qualitative measurement in the social sciences. Classification, typologies and indices. In D. Lerner & H. Lasswell (Eds.), The Policy Sciences (pp. 155–192). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
- Merari, A. (2010). Driven to death: Psychological and social aspects of suicide terrorism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Mickolus, E. (2003). International terrorism attributes of terrorist events (ITERATE) data codebook. Dunn Loring: Vinyard Software.Google Scholar
- Munck, G. L., & Verkuilen, J. (2002). Measuring democracy: Evaluating alternative indices. Comparative Political Studies, 35, 5–34.Google Scholar
- Paull, P. (1982). International terrorism: the propaganda war. Master’s thesis, University of San Francisco.Google Scholar
- Robson, C. (2002). Real world research: A resource for social scientists and practitioner-researchers. Malden: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
- Sandler, T., Arce, D. G., & Enders, W. E. (2008). Copenhagen consensus 2008 challenge paper: Terrorism. Retrieved July 29, 2011 from http://www.copenhagenconsensus.com/Files/Filer/CC08/Papers/0%20Challenge%20Papers/CP_Terrrorism_-_Sandler.pdf.
- Sandler, T., & Enders, W. (2008). Economic consequences of terrorism in developed and developing countries: An overview. In P. Keefer & N. Loayza (Eds.), Terrorism and economic development (pp. 17–47). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Schmid, A. (1983). Political terrorism: A research guide to concepts, theories, databases, and literature. New Brunswick: Transaction Books.Google Scholar
- Schmid, A. P., & Jongman, A. J. (1988). Political Terrorism: A New Guide to Actors, Authors, Concepts, Data Bases, Theories, and Literature. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Transaction Books, pp. 5–6.Google Scholar
- Schmid, A. (2004). Statistics on terrorism: The challenge of measuring trends, global terrorism. Forum on Crime and Society, 4(1–2), 49–69.Google Scholar
- Schmid, A., & Jongman, A. J. (2005). Political Terrorism: A new guide to actors, authors, concepts, data, theories, and literature. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
- Sheehan, I. S. (2007). When Terrorism and Counterterrorism Clash: The war on terrorism and the transformation of terrorist activity. Amherst: Cambria Press.Google Scholar
- START National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism. (2011). Codebook GTD Variables and Inclusion Criteria. Retrieved July 29, 2011 from http://www.start.umd.edu/gtd/downloads/Codebook.pdf.
- Wardlaw, G. (1982). Political Terrorism. Melbourne: Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
- Wigle, J. (2010). Introducing the worldwide incidents tracking system (WITS). Perspectives on Terrorism, 4(1), 3–23.Google Scholar
- Wilkinson, P. (1986). Trends in international terrorism and the American response. In L. Freedman & C. Hill (Eds.), Terrorism & International Order (pp. 37–55). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar