• Luciano L’Abate


Materialism, according to APA Dictionary of Psychology, is the philosophical position that everything, including mental events, is composed of physical matter and is thus subject to the laws of physics. From this prospective, the mind is considered to exist solely as a set of cerebral processes. This philosophy can be traced back to ancient times but gained a new impetus from advances in the physical sciences beginning in the seventeenth century. Originally, the causes of behavior were to be found in the material of the body, particularly the nervous system. More recently, the focus has been the cerebral system: the brain.


Cultural Theory Mechanistic Materialism Dialectical Materialism Cerebral System English Philosopher 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Berendzen, J. (2008). Postmetaphysical thinking or refusal of thought? Max Horkheimer’s materialism as philosophical stance. International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 16, 695–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Borodin, E. (2004). Contemporary philosophical materialism and synergetics. Russian Studies in Philosophy, 43, 28–46.Google Scholar
  3. Bussey, P. (2004). Beyond materialism: From the medieval scholars to quantum physics. Science & Christian Belief, 16, 157–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Capitelli, M., Guerra, C., L’Abate, L., Longo, S., & Rumbaugh, D. M. (2009). Science or mind? Reductionism proper, optimal reductionism, emergent interaction, and synthetic integration. In L. L’Abate, P. De Giacomo, M. Capitelli, & S. Longo (Eds.), Science, mind, and creativity: The Bari symposium (pp. 1–22). New York: Nova Science.Google Scholar
  5. Clarke, P. (2009). Neuroscience and the soul – A response to Malcolm Jeeves. Science & Christian Belief, 21, 61–64.Google Scholar
  6. Cusinato, M., & L’Abate, L. (Eds.). (2012). Advances in relational competence theory: With special attention to alexithymia. New York: Nova Science.Google Scholar
  7. De Giacomo, P., L’Abate, L., Pennebaker, J. W., & Rumbaugh, D. M. (2010). Amplifications and applications of Pennebaker’s analogic to digital model in health promotion, prevention, and psychotherapy. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 17, 355–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. De Santillana, G., & Zilsel, E. (1941). The development of rationalism and empiricism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  9. Flamm, M. (2009). Angus Kerr-Lawson and the ills and cures of scientistic materialism. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 45(4), 467–483.Google Scholar
  10. Fuller, B. A. G. (1946). History of philosophy (revised edition). New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
  11. Hartnett, J., & Skowronski, J. (2008). Cash, money, woes: The match between a person’s level of materialism and the materialistic (or non-materialistic) character of events alters affective forecasts. North American Journal of Psychology, 10, 647–664.Google Scholar
  12. Howell, R. (2008). The two-dimensionalist reductio. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 89, 348–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ivanov, A. (2007). On the problem of the ontological status of mental phenomena. Russian Studies in Philosophy, 45, 73–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kasser, T. (2002). The high price of materialism. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  15. Kerr-Lawson, A. (2002). The non-empiricist categories of Santayana’s materialism. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 38, 47–78.Google Scholar
  16. Klima, G. (2009). Aquinas on the materiality of the human soul and the immateriality of the human intellect. Philosophical Investigations, 32, 163–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. L’Abate, L. (2009). Paradigms, theories, and models: Two hierarchical models. In L. L’Abate, P. De Giacomo, M. Capitelli, & S. Longo (Eds.), Science, mind, and creativity: The Bari symposium (pp. 107–153). New York: Nova Science.Google Scholar
  18. L’Abate, L. (2011). Hurt feelings: Theory and research in intimate relationships. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  19. L’Abate, L., Cusinato, M., Maino, E., Colesso, W., & Scilletta, C. (2010). Relational competence theory: Research and mental health applications. New York: Springer-Science.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lektorskii, V. (2004). Philosophy is the self-consciousness of a culture. Russian Studies in Philosophy, 42, 73–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lerner, M. (2010, November/December). A spiritual approach to evolution. Tikkun.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Margolis, J. (2002). Reinventing pragmatism: America philosophy at the end of the twentieth century. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Moreno, D. (2009). On the recent elucidations of Santayana’s materialism by Angus Kerr-Lawson and John Lachs. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 45, 491–505.Google Scholar
  24. O’Shea, J. (2010). Normativity and scientific naturalism in Sellars’ ‘Janus-Faced’ space of reasons. International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 18, 459–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Peck, S. (2003). Randomness, contingency, and faith: Is there a science of subjectivity? Zygon: Journal of Religion & Science, 38, 5–23.Google Scholar
  26. Rhoads, B. (2006). The dynamic basis of geomorphology reenvisioned. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 96(1), 14–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rychlak, J. F. (Ed.). (1976). Dialectic: Humanistic rationale for behavior and development. New York: S. Karger.Google Scholar
  28. Schneider, K. (2005). Biology and awe: Psychology’s critical juncture. Humanistic Psychologist, 33, 167–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Skinner, J. (2006). Beyond materialism: Mental capacity and naturalism, a consideration of method. Metaphilosophy, 37, 74–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Tapper, A. (2002). Reid and Priestley on method and the mind. The Philosophical Quarterly, 52, 511–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Tennant, N. (2007). Mind, mathematics and the Ignorabimusstreit. British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 15(4), 745–773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Tian, C. (2002). Tongbian in the Chinese reading of dialectical materialism. Philosophy East & West, 52, 126–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Tiller, G. (2006). The unknowable: The pragmatist critique of matter. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 42(2), 206–228.Google Scholar
  34. Turl, J. (2010). Substance dualism or body-soul duality? Science & Christian Belief, 22, 57–80.Google Scholar
  35. van der Tuin, I., & Dolphijn, R. (2010). The transversality of new materialism. Women, 21, 153–171.Google Scholar
  36. Van Hiel, A., Cornelis, I., & Roets, A. (2010). To have or to be? A comparison of materialism-based theories and self-determination theory as explanatory frameworks of prejudice. Journal of Personality, 78, 1037–1070.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wiley, S. (2005). Spatial materialism. Cultural Studies, 19, 63–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Xiao, L., Smith, D., Bechara, A., & L’Abate, L. (2012). Biological foundations of hurt feelings: With special attention to neural mechanisms. In L. L’Abate (Ed.), Hurt feelings: Theory and research in intimate relationships (pp. 000–000). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyGeorgia State UniversityAtlantaUSA

Personalised recommendations