Skip to main content

Range of Distribution

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Beta maritima

Abstract

Sea beet is the most widespread taxon within genus Beta, and can be found quite easily along the seashores of Mediterranean Sea and the European Atlantic Ocean. On these coasts, countless localizations have been reported in the literature beginning in the early 1700s. The frequency of sea beet populations decreases as one goes inland, where the origin of the populations is more likely due to hybridization between sea beet and cultivated beet crops. Although rare, the presence of sea beet has been reported on the shores of the Middle East North Sea, India, China, Japan, and California. In North America, wild populations of Beta maritima, Beta macrocarpa, and respective hybrids (with cultivated beet) likely originated from contaminated seed imported from Europe during colonization of California by the Europeans.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Species complex is a cluster of closely related species, subspecies, cultivated, wild, and feral forms, which are able to exchange genetic material in natural conditions (Coyne 1989; Driessen 2003; Fénart et al. 2008; Pernès 1984).

  2. 2.

    On some sea beet samples belonging to the Herbarium siccum of Aldrovandi (Baldacci et al. 1907), salt crystals are still evident on the leaves (fig 1. 19).

References

  • Akperov Z (2000) Sugar beet in Azerbaijan. In: Maggioni L, Frese L, Germeier CU, Lipman E (eds) Report of a Working Group on Beta. First meeting, 9–10 Sept 1999, Broom’s Barn, Higham, Bury St. Edmunds, United Kingdom. IPGRI, Rome, Italy, pp 18–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Aleksidze G, Akparov Z, Melikyan A, Arjmand MN (2009) Biodiversity of Beta species in the Caucasus Region (Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, Iran). In: Frese L, Maggioni L, Lipman E (eds) Report of a Working Group on Beta and the World Beta Network. Third Joint Meeting, 8–11 Mar 2006, Puerto de la Cruz, Tenerife, Spain. Bioversity International, Rome, Italy, pp 38–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Ascherson P, Graebner P (1919) Synopsis der mitteleuropaischen Flora. Verlag von Gebrüder Borntraeger, Lipsia, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldacci A, de Toni E, Frati L, Ghigi A, Gortani M, Morini F, Ridolfi AC, Sorbelli A (1907) Intorno alla vita ed alle opere di Ulisse Aldrovandi. Libreria Treves di L. Beltrami, Bologna, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartsch D, Ellstrand NC (1999) Genetic evidence for the origin of Californian wild beets (genus Beta). Theor Appl Genet 99:1120–1130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartsch D, Schmidt M (1997) Influence of sugar beet breeding on populations of Beta vulgaris ssp. maritima in Italy. J Veg Sci 8:81–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartsch D, Cuguen J, Biancardi E, Sweet J (2003) Environmental implications of gene flow from sugar beet to wild beet–current status and future research needs. Environ Biosafety Res 2:105–115

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Batwik JI (2000) Strandbete Beta vulgaris L. ssp. maritima (L.) Arc. er trolig borte fra Ï•stfold i dag pÃ¥ grunn av barfrost. Natur Østfold 1–2:38–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauhin G (1622) Catalougus plantarum circa Basileam sponte nascentium… etc. Basilea, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker-Dillingen J (1928) Handbuch des Hackfruchtbaues und Handelapflanzbaues. Verlag Paul Parey, Berlin, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Biancardi E (1999) Miglioramento genetico. In: Casarini B, Biancardi E, Ranalli P (eds) La barbabietola da zucchero in ambiente mediterraneo. Edagricole, Bologna, Italy, pp 45–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Boissier E (1879) Flora orientalis sive enumeratio plantarum in Oriente a Graecia et Aegiptoas Indias fines etc. Georg, Apud H, Lyon, France & Ginevra, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • Carsner E (1928) The wild beet in California. Facts Sugar 23:1120–1121

    Google Scholar 

  • Carsner E (1938) Wild beets in California. Proc Am Soc Sugar Beet Technol 1:79

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen E (1996) Neuer Fund der Betarübe an Schleswig-Holsteins Osteeküste. Kieler Notizien zur Pflanzenkunde in Schleswig-Holstein und Hamburg 24:30–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Coons GH (1954) The wild species of Beta. Proc Am Soc Sugar Beet Technol 8:142–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Coyne JA (1989) Speciation and its consequences. Sinauer Associates, Suderland, MA, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuguen J, Saumitou-Laprade P, Spriet CVP (1992) Male sterility and DNA polymorphism in B. maritima. In: Frese L (ed) International Beta Genetic Resources Network. A report on the 2nd International Beta Genetic Resources Workshop held at the Institute for Crop Science and Plant Breeding, Braunschweig, Germany, 24–28 June 1991. IBPGR, Rome, Italy, pp 49–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin C (1899) Das Variiren der Tieren und Pflanzen. Carus, Stuttgart, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • de Candolle A (1884) Der Ursprung der Culturpflazen. Brockhaus, Lipsia, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • de Tournefort JP (1700) Institutiones rei herbariae. Thypographia Regia, Paris, France

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • de Vries U (1905) Species and varieties. Open Court, Chicago, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Desfontaines R (1829) Catalogus plantarum horti regii Parisiensis. JS Chaudé, Paris, France

    Google Scholar 

  • Donati A (1826) Flora veneta o descrizione delle piante che nascono nella provincia di Venezula. Presso Leone Bonvecchiato, Venice, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  • Doney DL (1992) Morphology of North Atlantic Beta. In: Frese L (ed) International Beta Genetic Resources Network. A report on the 2nd International Beta Genetic Resources Workship held at the Institute for Crop Science and Plant Breeding, Braunschweig, Germany, 24–28 June 1991. IBPGR, Rome, pp 17–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Doney DL, McFarlane JS (1985) Sugar beet exploration Italy and France. Unclassified USDA Report

    Google Scholar 

  • Doney D, Whitney E (1990) Genetic enhancement in Beta for disease resistance using wild relatives: a strong case for the value of genetic conservation. Econ Bot 44:445–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doney DL, Whitney ED, Terry J, Frese L, Fitzgerald P (1990) The distribution and disperal of Beta maritima germplasm in England, Wales, and Ireland. J Sugar Beet Res 27:29–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Driessen S (2003) Beta vulgaris ssp. maritima an Deutschlands Ostseeküste. Dissertation RWTH Aachen, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • El-Samad EH, El-Gizawy AM, El-Khishin DA, Lashine ZA (2009) Estimation of genetic diversity in wild and cultivated form of beet using RAPD and AFLP markers. Res J Agric & Biol Sci 5: 207–219

    Google Scholar 

  • Engan NC (1994) Stranbete Beta vulgaris ssp. maritima funnet sponton i Norge. Blyttia 52:33–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Fénart S, Arnaud JF, de Cauwer I, Cuguen J (2008) Nuclear and cytoplasmic genetic diversity in weed beet and sugar beet accessions compared to wild relatives: new insights into the genetic relationships within the Beta vulgaris complex species. Theor Appl Genet 116:1063–1077

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fievet V, Touzet P, Arnaud JF, Cuguen J (2007) Spatial analysis of nuclear and cytoplasmic DNA diversity in wild sea beet (Beta vulgaris ssp. maritima) populations: do marine currents shape the genetic structure? Mol Ecol 16:1847–1864

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frese L (2010) Conservation and access to sugar beet germplasm. Sugar Tech 12:207–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghandilyan PA, Melikyan ASh (2000) Beta genetic resources in Armenia. In: Maggioni L, Frese L, Germeier CU, Lipman E (eds) Report of a Working Group on Beta. First meeting, 9–10 Sept 1999, Broom’s Barn, Higham, Bury St. Edmunds, United Kingdom. IPGRI, Rome, Italy, pp 15–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Grogan D (2009) Surwey of Beta vulgaris subsp. maritima populations in Ireland. In: Frese L, Maggioni L, Lipman E (eds) Report of a Working Group on Beta and the World Beta Network. Third Joint Meeting, 8–11 Mar 2006, Puerto de la Cruz, Tenerife, Spain. Bioversity International, Rome, Italy, pp 53–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen M, Kraft T, Christiansson M, Nilsson NO (1999) Evaluation of AFLP in Beta. Theor Appl Genet 98:845–852

    Google Scholar 

  • Hermann C (1937) Wild beets on the East Coast. Brit Sugar Beet Rev 11:105–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Hohenacker M (1838) Pflanzen der Provinz Talish. Soc. Imp Naturalists, Moscow, Russia

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooker WJ (1835) The British Flora. George Walker Arnott, Glasgow, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • IPGRI (2004) Report of a Working Group on Beta and World Beta Network. Second joint meeting, 23–26 October 2002, Bologna, Italy. Frese, L., C. Germeier, E. Lipman and L. Maggioni, compilers. IPGRI, Rome, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  • Jassem B (1985) Variation of maritime beet (Beta maritima L.). Genet Pol 26:463–469

    Google Scholar 

  • Karsten H (1880) Deutsche flora, pharmaceutisch-medicinsche botanik. J.M. Spaeth, Berlin, Germany

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Krasochkin VT, Ouzunow VH (1931) Beets in countries of their ancient cultivation. Russ Bull Appl Bot 26:79–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubiak-Martens L (1999) The plant food component of the diet at the late Mesolithic (Ertebolle) settlement at Tybrind Vig, Denmark. Veg Hist Archaeobot 8:117–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Letschert JPW (1993) Beta section Beta: biogeographical patterns of variation, and taxonomy. Ph.D. Wageningen Agricultural Univ Papers 93–1

    Google Scholar 

  • Letschert JPW, Frese L (1993) Analysis of morphological variation in wild beet (Beta vulgaris L.) from Sicily. Genet Res Crop Evol 40:15–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linnè C (1797) Systema vegetabilium secundum classes, ordines, genera,species, …etc., 15th edn. Typis et impensis Io., Göttingen, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Makino T (1901) Observations on the flora of Japan. Bot Mag Tokyo 15:1–494

    Google Scholar 

  • McFarlane JS (1975) Naturally occurring hybrids between sugarbeet and Beta macrocarpa in the Imperial Valley of California. J Am Soc Sugar Beet Technol 18:245–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Micheli PA (1748) Catalogus plantarum Horti Cesarei Florentini etc. Florence, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  • Munerati O, Mezzadroli G, Zapparoli TV (1913) Osservazioni sulla Beta maritima L., nel triennio 1910–1912. Sta Sper Agr Ital 46:415–445

    Google Scholar 

  • Often A, Svalheim E (2001) Seashore beet Beta vulgaris ssp. maritima. Blyttia 59:192

    Google Scholar 

  • Parkinson J (1655) Matthiae de L’Obel stirpium illustrationes. Warren, London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen O (2009) Strand plants—new records of strand plants, especially at Lista. Blyttia 67:75–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Pernès J (1984) Gestion des resources génétique des plantes, vol 2. Agence Cooperation Culturelle Technique, Paris, France

    Google Scholar 

  • Pignone D (1989) Wild Beta germplasm under threat in Italy. FAO/IPGRI Plant Genetic Resources Newsletter 77:40

    Google Scholar 

  • Post GE (1869) Flora of Syria, Palestine, and Sinai. Syrian Protestant College, Beirut, Syria

    Google Scholar 

  • Rashal I, Kazachenko R (2000) Beta genetic resources in Latvia. In: Maggioni L, Frese L, Germeier CU, Lipman E (eds) Report of a Working Group on Beta. First meeting, 9–10 September 1999, Broom’s Barn, Higham, Bury St. Edmunds, United Kingdom. IPGRI, Rome, Italy, pp 35–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Ray J (1738) Travels through the low-countries, Germany, Italy, and France, 2nd edn. J. walthoe, London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichenbach L, Reichenbach HG (1909) Icones florae Germanicae et Helveticae. Sumptibus Federici de Zezschwitz, Lipisia, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Shun ZF, Chu SY, Frese L (2000) Study on the relationship between Chinese and East Mediterranean Beta vulgaris L. subsp. vulgaris (leaf beet group) accessions. In: Maggioni L, Frese L, Germeier CU, Lipman E (eds) Report of a Working Group on Beta. First meeting, 9–10 Sept 1999, Broom’s Barn, Higham, Bury St. Edmunds, UK. IPGRI, Rome, Italy, pp 65–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Stehno Z, Chyilova V, Faberova V (2000) Status of the Beta collection in the Czech Republic. In: Maggioni L, Frese L, Germeier CU, Lipman E (eds) Report of a Working Group on Beta. First meeting, 9–10 Sept 1999, Broom’s Barn, Higham, Bury St. Edmunds, United Kingdom. IPGRI, Rome, Italy, pp 21–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Svirshchevskaya A (2000) Germplasm collections in Belarus. In: Maggioni L, Frese L, Germeier CU, Lipman E (eds) Report of a Working Group on Beta. First meeting, 9–10 Sept 1999, Broom’s Barn, Higham, Bury St. Edmunds, UK, IPGRI, Rome, Italy, pp 20

    Google Scholar 

  • Tenore M (1851) Sylloge plantarum vascularum florae neapolitanae etc. Ex Typographia Fibreni, Naples, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulbrich E (1934) Chenopodiaceae. In: Engler A, Harms H (eds) Die Natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien. Wilhelm Engelmann, Leipzig, Germany pp 375–584

    Google Scholar 

  • van Dijk H (1998) Variation for developmental characters in Beta vulgaris subsp. maritima in relation to latitude: The importance of in situ conservation. In: Frese L, Panella L, Srivastava HM, Lange W (eds) A report on the 4th International Beta Genetic Resources Workshop and World Beta Network Conference held at the Aegean Agricultural Research Institute, Izmir, Turkey, 28 Feb–3 Mar 1996, IPGRI, Rome, Italy, pp 30–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Viard F, Arnaud J-F, Delescluse M, Cuguen J (2004) Tracing back seed and pollen flow within the crop-wild Beta vulgaris complex: genetic distinctiveness vs. hot spots of hybridization over a regional scale. Mol Ecol 13:1357–1364

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Villain S (2007) Histoire evolutive de la section Beta. Dissertation. Universitè des Sciences et Technologies de Lille, France

    Google Scholar 

  • von Lippmann EO (1925) Geschichte der Rübe (Beta) als Kulturpflanze. Verlag Julius Springer, Berlin, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • von Proskowetz E (1895) Ãœber die Culturversuche mit Beta im Jahre 1894 und über Beobachtungen an Wildformen auf naturlichen Standorten. Ibidem 32:227–275

    Google Scholar 

  • von Proskowetz E (1896) Ãœber die Culturversuche mit Beta im Jahre 1895. Ibidem 33:711–766

    Google Scholar 

  • Watt JR (1899) Dictionary of the economic products of India. Joret, London, UK

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Enrico Biancardi .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Biancardi, E., Panella, L.W., Lewellen, R.T. (2012). Range of Distribution. In: Beta maritima. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0842-0_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics