Evolution and Informationally Efficient Equilibrium in a Commodity Futures Market

Chapter
Part of the Studies in Economic Theory book series (ECON.THEORY, volume 28)

Abstract

This chapter presents an evolutionary model of a futures market to justify the eventual occurrence of an informationally efficient equilibrium. While  the literature usually justifies informational efficiency in the context of rationality, here, in this dynamic futures market, traders do not maximize their profits or utilities nor do they form rational expectation about spot prices. Instead, they are preprogramed with some predetermined behavioral traits (such as trading types (buyer or seller), traders’ inherent abilities to predict the spot price). With the markets serving as a selection process of information, it can be shown that the proportion of time that the futures price equal to the spot price converges to one with probability one.

Keywords

Expense Posit 

References

  1. Alchian, A. 1950. Uncertainty, evolution and economic theory. Journal of Political Economy 58:211–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen, B. 1981. Generic existence of equilibria for economies with uncertainty when prices convey information. Econometrica 49:1173–1199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Biais, B. and Shadur, R. 2000. On the survival of irrational traders: a Darwinian approach, European Economic Review 44:469–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Billingsley, P. 1986. Probability and measure. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  5. Blume, L. and Easley, D. 1992. Evolution and market behavior. Journal of Economic Theory 58:9–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bray, M. 1981. Futures trading, rational expectations, and the efficient markets hypothesis. Econometrica 49:575–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Castro, L.I. de, Marialaura, P., and Yannelis, N. 2011. “A new perspective to rational expectations:maximin rational expectations equilibrium”. Working paper, Department of Economics, University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign.Google Scholar
  8. Feiger, G.M. 1978. Divergent rational expectations equilibrium in a dynamic model of a futures market. Journal of Economic Theory 17:164–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Figlewski, S. 1978. Market ‘efficiency’ in a market with heterogeneous information. Journal of Political Economy 86:681–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Figlewski, S. 1982. Information diversity and market behavior, Journal of Finance 37:87–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fischer, P.E. and R.E. Verrecchia. 1997. Steady state heuristic trade, mimeo, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
  12. Friedman, M. 1953. Essays in positive economics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  13. Gnedenko, B.V. 1963. The theory of probability. New York: Chelsea Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  14. Grossman, S.J. 1976. On the efficiency of competitive stock markets where traders have diverse information.  Journal of Finance 31:573–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Grossman, S.J. 1978. Further results on the informational efficiency of competitive stock markets. Journal of Economic Theory 18:81–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hellwig, M.F. 1980. On the aggregation of information in competitive markets. Journal of Economic Theory 22:477–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kahneman, D., P. Slovic and A. Tversky, eds. 1982. Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Kyle, A.S. and F.A. Wang. 1997. Speculation Duopoly with agreement to disagree: can overconfidence survive the market test? mimeo, Graduate School of Business, Columbia University.Google Scholar
  19. Luo, G. 1995a. Evolution and market competition. Journal of Economic Theory 67:223–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Luo, G. 1995b. Evolutionary models of market behavior. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Western Ontario.Google Scholar
  21. Radner, R. 1979. Rational expectations equilibrium: generic existence and the information revealed by prices. Econometrica 47: 655–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Tversky, A. and D. Kahneman. 1974. Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science 185:1124–1131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.DeGroote School of BusinessMcMaster UniversityHamiltonCanada

Personalised recommendations