Drawing from the previously presented life-history narratives of participants in consumer-run organizations (CROs), this chapter seeks to provide general insights into the recovery process. I also consider implications for practice that are based on insights from the role framework and the holistic consideration of all studies presented in the book. The strengths and weaknesses of the qualitative and quantitative methods used to develop and test the role framework are also discussed. Many weaknesses of the qualitative studies are addressed by the quantitative studies and vice versa. However, numerous limitations of the research remain and this chapter presents future research directions that can further improve our understanding of how people benefit from CROs. Finally, the book concludes with some consideration of how the role framework informs future directions for the treatment and prevention of mental health problems.
KeywordsMental Health Problem Leadership Role Skill Development Identity Transformation Severe Mental Health Problem
- Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.Google Scholar
- Borkman, T. J. (1999). Understanding self-help/mutual aid: Experiential learning in the commons. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
- Callero, P. L. (1992). The meaning of self-in-role: a modified measure of role identity. Social Forces, 71, 485–501.Google Scholar
- Chiu, M. Y. L., Ho, W. W. N., Lo, W. T. L., & Yiu, M. G. C. (2010). Operationalization of the SAMHSA model of recovery: a quality of life perspective. Quality of Life Research: An International Journal of Quality of Life Aspects of Treatment, Care & Rehabilitation, 19(1), 1–13. doi: 10.1007/s11136-009-9555-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Greenfield, T. K., Stoneking, B. C., Humphreys, K., Sundby, E., & Bond, J. (2008). A randomized trial of a mental health consumer-managed alternative to civil commitment for acute psychiatric crisis. American Journal of Community Psychology, 42(1–2), 135–144. doi: 10.1007/s10464-008-9180-1.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Isaacson, W. (2009). How to save your newspaper. Time, 16, 30–33.Google Scholar
- Knowles, E. S., & Linn, J. (Eds.). (2004). Resistance and persuasion. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1986). But is it rigorous? Trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation. Naturalistic Evaluation, 30, 73–84.Google Scholar
- Nelson, G., Janzen, R., Ochocka, J., & Trainor, J. (2010). Participatory action research and evaluation with mental health self-help initiatives: a theoretical framework. In L. D. Brown & S. A. Wituk (Eds.), Mental health self-help: Consumer and family initiatives (pp. 39–60). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Nelson, G., Ochocka, J., Griffin, K., & Lord, J. (1998). ‘Nothing about me, without me’: Participatory action research with self-help/mutual aid organizations for psychiatric consumer/survivors. American Journal of Community Psychology, 26(6), 881–912. doi: 10.1023/a:1022298129812.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Talbott, B. H., & Hallows, S. (2008). Leadership skills: developing a measure for college students. Intuition, 4, 12–18.Google Scholar
- Teague, G.B., Johnsen, M., Rogers, J.A., & Schell, B. (2005). Research on consumer-operated service programs: Effectiveness findings and policy implications of a large multi-site study. Retrieved March 10 2009, from http://www.power2u.org/cosp.html.
- Wolf, R., & Grotta, G. L. (1985). Images: a question of readership [Article]. Newspaper Research Journal, 6(2), 30–36.Google Scholar