Advertisement

Retinal Degeneration in the Fly

  • Nansi Jo Colley
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology book series (AEMB, volume 723)

Abstract

In the 1980s, Drosophila took on a surprising role as an animal model for retinal disease, when the genetic similarities and fundamental processes between flies and humans became apparent. Despite its perceived simplicity, the fruit fly is, indeed, a remarkably complex creature with a genetic makeup that is surprisingly similar to our own. Investigators continue to capitalize on a whole host of versatile genetic techniques together with the accessibility of the fly to dissect fundamental photoreceptor cell mechanisms in vivo. The brief life span of the fly, only 2 months, allows for monitoring the onset and progression of retinal degeneration in a short time. These advantageous features place Drosophila among the important animal models used for unraveling the basis of and therapeutic treatments for retinal degenerative disorders.

Keywords

Drosophila melanogaster Compound eye Rhodopsin Invertebrate phototransduction Retinitis pigmentosa Age-related macular degeneration Photoreceptor Protein trafficking Secretory pathway 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Our research, on retinal degeneration in Drosophila, is supported by funding from the National Eye Institute (R01 EY08768), the Retina Research Foundation, and the Retina Research Foundation/Walter H. Helmerich Research Chair. I gratefully acknowledge C. Vang, E. Rosenbaum, and B. Larson for assistance with preparing the manuscript and figures.

References

  1. Audo I, Kohl S, Leroy BP et al (2009) TRPM1 is mutated in patients with autosomal-recessive complete congenital stationary night blindness. Am J Hum Genet 85:720–729PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baker EK, Colley NJ, Zuker CS (1994) The cyclophilin homolog NinaA functions as a chaperone, forming a stable complex in vivo with its protein target rhodopsin. EMBO Journal 13:4886–4895PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bok D (2007) Contributions of genetics to our understanding of inherited monogenic retinal diseases and age-related macular degeneration. Arch Ophthalmol 125:160–164PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chang HY, Ready DF (2000) Rescue of photoreceptor degeneration in rhodopsin-null Drosophila mutants by activated Rac1. Science 290:1978–1980PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Colley NJ (2010) Retinal Degeneration through the Eye of the Fly. Encyclopedia of the Eye 4:54–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Colley NJ, Baker EK, Stamnes MA et al (1991) The cyclophilin homolog ninaA is required in the secretory pathway. Cell 67:255–263PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Colley NJ, Cassill JA, Baker EK et al (1995) Defective intracellular transport is the molecular basis of rhodopsin-dependent dominant retinal degeneration. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92:3070–3074PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dryja TP, McGee TL, Reichel E et al (1990) A point mutation of the rhodopsin gene in one form of retinitis pigmentosa. Nature 343:364–366PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ferreira PA, Nakayama TA, Pak WL et al (1996) Cyclophilin-related protein RanBP2 acts as chaperone for red/green opsin. Nature 383:637–640PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Graham DM, Wong KY, Shapiro P et al (2008) Melanopsin ganglion cells use a membrane-associated rhabdomeric phototransduction cascade. J Neurophysiol 99:2522–2532PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hardie RC, Postma M (2008) Phototransduction in Microvillar Photoreceptors of Drosophila and Other Invertebrates. San Diego, CA: Academic PressGoogle Scholar
  12. Koike C, Numata T, Ueda H et al (2010) TRPM1: A vertebrate TRP channel responsible for retinal ON bipolar function. Cell Calcium 48:95–101PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kraus A, Groenendyk J, Bedard K et al (2010) Calnexin deficiency leads to dysmyelination. J Biol Chem 285:18928–18938PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kurada P, O’Tousa JE (1995) Retinal degeneration caused by dominant rhodopsin mutations in Drosophila. Neuron 14:571–579PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lawrence PA (1992) The Making of a Fly The Genetics of Animal Design. Cambridge: Blackwell Scientific PublicationsGoogle Scholar
  16. Minke B, Parnas M (2006) Insights on TRP channels from in vivo studies in Drosophila. Annu Rev Physiol 68:649–684PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. O’Tousa JE, Leonard DS, Pak WL (1989) Morphological defects in ora photoreceptors caused by mutation in R1-6 opsin gene of Drosophila. J Neurogenetics 6:41–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. O’Tousa JE, Baehr W, Martin RL et al (1985) The Drosophila ninaE gene encodes an opsin. Cell 40:839–850PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ondek B, Hardy RW, Baker EK et al (1992) Genetic dissection of cyclophilin function: saturation mutagenesis of the Drosophila cyclophilin homolog ninaA. Journal of Biological Chemistry 267:16460–16466PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Pak WL (1995) Drosophila in vision research. The Friedenwald Lecture. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 36:2340–2357PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Panda S, Nayak SK, Campo B et al (2005) Illumination of the Melanopsin Signaling Pathway. Science 307:600–604PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Provencio I, Jiang G, De Grip WJ et al (1998) Melanopsin: An opsin in melanophores, brain, and eye. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:340–345PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Roof DJ, Adamian M, Hayes A (1994) Rhodopsin accumulation at abnormal sites in retinas of mice with a human P23H rhodopsin transgene. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 35:4049–4062Google Scholar
  24. Rosenbaum EE, Hardie RC, Colley NJ (2006) Calnexin is essential for rhodopsin maturation, Ca2+ regulation, and photoreceptor cell survival. Neuron 49:229–241PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rubin GM, Lewis EB (2000) A Brief History of Drosophila’s Contributions to Genome Research. Science 287:2216–2218PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sekaran, S., Lall, G.S., Ralphs, K.L., Wolstenholme, A.J., Lucas, R.J., Foster, R.G., and Hankins, M.W. (2007). 2-Aminoethoxydiphenylborane is an acute inhibitor of directly photosensitive retinal ganglion cell activity in vitro and in vivo. J Neurosci 27, 3981–3986PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Stephenson RS, O’Tousa J, Scavarda NJ et al (1983) Drosophila mutants with reduced rhodopsin content. Symposia of the Society for Experimental Biology 36:477–501PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Tomlinson A, Ready DF (1987) Cell fate in the Drosophila ommatidium. Developmental Biology 123:264–275PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Zuker CS, Cowman AF, Rubin GM (1985) Isolation and structure of a rhodopsin gene from D. melanogaster. Cell 40:851–858PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences and Department of Genetics, and UW-Eye Research InstituteUniversity of WisconsinMadisonUSA

Personalised recommendations