Abstract
It would seem that for many people, spaces on the Web have become an integral part of their lives. This may include seeking out learning opportunities in online communities. But how do people negotiate the materiality of screens and settings; discussion boards, RSS feeds and avatars; passwords and Facebook profiles? Emphasizing the relational aspects of learning, networked learning focuses on connections among learners, other people, learning resources and technologies. Although human–human relations are not necessarily privileged, appropriate conceptual tools are required to explore other types of relations, particularly human–non-human associations. Actor Network Theory (ANT) is one perspective that enables a socio-material exploration of heterogeneous networks. This chapter draws on ANT to explore how the interactions between Web technologies and self-employed workers shape work-related learning practices in an online community. The chapter examines the co-constitutive relationship between human and non-human actants. Findings suggest that participating “in” an online community is a series of passages marked by both attempts to stabilize and disrupt relations. As participants in this study attempted to “tame” the technology, the technologies in use were doing their part to tame other actants. However, these relationships do not describe distinct human and non-human entities, but rather hybrids or socio-technical constructions – a blending. The chapter concludes with questions emerging from such provocative entanglements.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Adams, C., & Thompson, T. L. (2011). Interviewing objects: Including educational technologies as qualitative research participants. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 1–18. http://www.tandfonline.com/action/showAxaArticles?journalCode=tqse20
Alexander, B. (2006). Web 2.0: A new wave of innovation for teaching and learning? EDUCAUSE Review, 41(2), 33–44.
Anderson, P. (2007). What is Web 2.0? Ideas, technologies and implications for education (JISC Technology and Standards Watch). Retrieved from JISC website: http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/techwatch/tsw0701b.pdf
Antonelli, P. (2008). Design and the elastic mind. In L. Hruska & R. Roberts (Eds.), Design and the elastic mind (pp. 14–27). New York, NY: The Museum of Modern Art.
Beaty, L., Cousin, G., & Hodgson, V. (2010). Revisting the e-quality in networked learning manifesto. In L. Dirckinck-Holmfeld, V. Hodgson, C. Jones, M. de Laat, D. McConnell, & T. Ryberg (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Networked Learning 2010. Available from http://www.lancs.ac.uk/fss/organisations/netlc/past/nlc2010/index.htm
Bonderup Dohn, N. (2008). Knowledge 2.0 – tensions and challenges for education. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Networked Learning (pp. 650–657). Retrieved from http://www.networkedlearningconference.org.uk/past/nlc2008/Info/confpapers.htm#Top
Boyd, D. (2006). G/localization: When global information and local interaction collide. Paper presented at the O’Reilly Emerging Technology Conference. Retreived from http://www.danad.org/papers.Etech2006.html
Bryant, L. (2005, January 6). Blogs are not the only fruit [Web log message]. Retrieved from http://headshift.com/blog/2005/01/blogs-are-not-the-only-fruit.php
Callon, M. (1987). Society in the making: The study of technology as a tool for sociological analysis. In W. E. Bijker, T. P. Hughes, & T. J. Pinch (Eds.), The social construction of technological systems: New directions in the sociology and history of technology (pp. 83–103). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chesher, C. (2002). Why the digital computer is dead. CTheory, a106. Retrieved from http://www.ctheory.net/printer.aspx?id=334
Economic & Social Research Council. (2002, March). Working towards e-quality in networked e-learning in higher education: A manifesto statement for debate. Retrieved from http://csalt.lancs.ac.uk/esrc/manifesto.pdf
Edwards, R., & Usher, R. (2008). Globalisation and pedagogy: Space, place and identity (2nd ed.). Milton Park, England: Routledge. doi:10.1080/158037042000225191.
E-Quality Network. (2002). E-quality in e-learning Manifesto. Presented at the Networked Learning 2002 conference, Sheffield, available at http://csalt.lancs.ac.uk/esrc/
Facebook. (2011). Statistics. Retrieved from http://www.facebook.com/press/info.php?statistics
Fenwick, T. (2010). Re-thinking the “thing”: Sociomaterial approaches to understanding and researching learning in work. Journal of Workplace Learning, 22(1/2), 104–116. doi:10.1108/13665621011012898.
Fenwick, T., & Edwards, R. (2010). Actor-network theory in education. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
Fox, S. (2009). Contexts of teaching and learning: An actor-network view of the classroom. In R. Edwards, G. Biesta, & M. Thorpe (Eds.), Rethinking contexts for learning and teaching: Community, activities, and networks (pp. 31–43). New York, NY: Routledge.
Goodyear, P., Banks, S., Hodgson, V., & McConnell, D. (2004). Research on networked learning: An overview. In P. Goodyear, S. Banks, V. Hodgson, & D. McConnell (Eds.), Advances in research on networked learning (pp. 1–11). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Harman, G. (2009). Prince of networks: Bruno Latour and metaphysics. Melbourne, Australia: Repress.
Haythornthwaite, C. (2008). Ubiquitous transformations. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Networked Learning (pp. 598–605). Retrieved from http://www.networkedlearningconference.org.uk/past/nlc2008/Info/confpapers.htm#Top
Introna, L. (2007). Maintaining the reversibility of foldings: Making the ethics (politics) of information technology visible. Ethics and Information Technology, 9(1), 11–25. doi:10.1007/s10676-006-9133-z.
Jones, C. R., Ferreday, D., & Hodgson, V. (2008). Networked learning a relational approach: Weak and strong ties. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(2), 90–102. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2007.00271x.
Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Latour, B. (2002). Morality and technology: The ends of the means. (C. Venn, Trans.). Theory, Culture & Society, 19(5/6), 247–260.
Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network theory. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Law, J. (2002). Objects and spaces. Theory, Culture & Society, 19(5/6), 91–105.
Law, J. (2004). After method: Mess in social science research. Milton Park, England: Routledge.
Law, J. (2007). Pinboards and books: Juxtaposing, learning, and materiality. In D. W. Kritt & L. T. Winegar (Eds.), Education and technology: Critical perspectives, possible futures (pp. 125–149). Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
Law, J. (2009). Actor network theory and material semiotics. In B. S. Turner (Ed.), The new Blackwell companion to social theory (pp. 141–158). Chichester, England: Wiley-Blackwell.
Michael, M. (2000). Reconnecting culture, technology and nature: From society to heterogeneity. London, England: Routledge.
Michael, M. (2004). On making data social: Heterogeneity in sociological practice. Qualitative Research, 4(1), 5–23. doi:10.1177/1468794104041105.
Mol, A., & Law, J. (1994). Regions, networks and fluids: Anaemia and social topology. Social Studies of Science, 24(4), 642–671.
Moser, I., & Law, J. (1999). Good passages, bad passages. In J. Law & J. Hassard (Eds.), Actor network theory and after (pp. 196–219). Oxford, England: Blackwell Publishers.
Nespor, J. (1994). Knowledge in motion: Space, time and curriculum in undergraduate physics and management. London, England: The Falmer Press.
Oblinger, D. G. (2008). Growing up with Google: What it means to education. In Emerging technologies for learning (Vol. 3, pp. 11–29). Retrieved from http://www.becta.org.uk/research/reports/emergingtechnologies
Pels, D., Hetherington, K., & Vandenberghe, F. (2002). The status of the object: Performances, mediations, and techniques. Theory, Culture & Society, 19(5/6), 1–21.
Preimesberger, C. (2010). Yahoo refreshes, upgrades some products. Retrieved from http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Search-Engines/Yahoo-Refreshes-Upgrades-Some-Products-775120/
Ryberg, T. (2008). Challenges and potentials for institutional and technological infrastructures in adopting social media. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Networked Learning (pp. 658–665). Retrieved from http://www.networkedlearningconference.org.uk/past/nlc2008/Info/confpapers.htm#Top
Singleton, V. (2005). The promise of public health: Vulnerable policy and lazy citizens. Environment and Planning D: Space and Society, 23(5), 771–786. doi:10.1068/d355t.
Suchman, L. A. (2007). Human-machine reconfigurations: Plans and situated actions (2nd ed.). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Technorati. (2008). State of the blogosphere 2008. Retrieved from http://technorati.com/blogging/state-of-the-blogosphere/
Thompson, T. L. (2010). Assembly required: Self-employed workers’ informal work-learning in online communities. PhD dissertation, University of Alberta.
Van Dijk, N. (2010). Property, privacy and personhood in a world of ambient intelligence. Ethics and Information Technology, 12(1), 57–69. doi:10.1007/s10676-009-9211-0.
Waltz, S. B. (2006). Nonhumans unbound: Actor-network theory and the reconsideration of “things” in educational foundations. Educational Foundations, 20(3/4), 51–68.
Young, N. (2006). Distance as a hybrid actor in rural economies. Journal of Rural Studies, 22(3), 253–266. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2005.11.007.
YouTube. (2011). Statistics. Retrieved from (2011). Statistics. Retrieved from http://www.youtube.com/t/press_statistics
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Thompson, T.L. (2012). Who’s Taming Who? Tensions Between People and Technologies in Cyberspace Communities. In: Dirckinck-Holmfeld, L., Hodgson, V., McConnell, D. (eds) Exploring the Theory, Pedagogy and Practice of Networked Learning. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0496-5_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0496-5_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-0495-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-0496-5
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)