Abstract
This chapter draws on the different chapters in this book in an attempt to address four key questions that are important in taking us forward in our understanding of the nature and purpose of networked learning. The ontological and epistemological foundations of networked learning are critically examined. It is argued that networked learning comes from an ontological position that assumes an understanding and view of the world, including learning and teaching that is socio-culturally influenced and constructed. We identify, e-quality, inclusion, critical reflexivity and relational dialogue as key theoretical perspectives and values associated with the pedagogical and socio-technical design of networked learning. Equally important to us, however, is the nature of meaning and understanding of knowledge and of the world that is constructed and how it contributes to the wellbeing of society and the world in which we live. Networked learning places a high value on cooperation and collaboration in the learning process; self-determination; difference; trust; investment of self in the networked learning process; and the role technology plays in connecting and mediating. The popularisation of Web 2.0 practices and technologies has revitalised these educational terms. However, the chapter indicates that an institutional and managerial commitment is required in order for networked learning to become widely accepted in institutions. Our point of view on networked learning is a relational and transformative one, which is equally shaped by the underlying theoretical educational perspective and values with which we approach the pedagogical and the socio-technical design of learning. Learners have agency, and learning is mediated through socio-technical learning infrastructures, pedagogical principles and organisational cultures. The chapter provides new insights building on a relational perspective between agency and structure.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Banks, S.B., McConnell, D., and Bowskill, N. (2008). A feeling or a practice? Achieving interculturality in an e-learning course (pp. 712–719). Proceedings of the 6 th International Conference on Networked Learning. ISBN 978-1-86220-206-1.
Bordieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice. Cambridge: Polity.
Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education: an introduction to the philosophy of education (1966 edn). New York: Free.
Dirckinck-Holmfeld, L., Nielsen, J., Fibiger, B., & Danielsen, O. (2009). Problem and project based learning. In L. Dirckinck-Holmfeld, C. Jones, & B. Lindström (Eds.), Analysing networked learning practices in higher education and continuing professional development. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding. Helsinki: Orienta.
Engeström, Y. (2009). The future of activity theory: a rough draft. In A. Sannino, H. Daniels, & K. D. Gutiérrez (Eds.), Learning and expanding with activity theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fox, S. (2006). “Inquiries of every imaginable kind”: ethnomethodology, practical action and the new socially situated learning theory. Sociological Review, 54(3), 426–445.
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York, NY: Continum.
Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: self and society in the late modern age. Cambridge: Polity.
Goodfellow, R. (2008). New directions in research into learning cultures in online education (pp. 553–559). Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Networked Learning. ISBN 978-1-86220-206-1.
Goodyear, P., Jones, C., Asensio, M., Hodgson, V., & Steeples, C. (2005). Networked learning in higher education: students’ expectations and experiences. Higher Education, 50(3), 473–508.
Harasim, L., Hiltz, S. R., Teles, L., & Turoff, M. (1995). Network learning: a paradigm for the twenty-first century. In L. Harasim, S. R. Hiltz, L. Teles, & M. Turoff (Eds.), Learning networks: a field guide to teaching and learning online (pp. 272–278). Cambridge, MA: MIT.
Hodgson, V., & Reynolds, M. (2005). Consensus, difference and “multiple communities” in networked learning. Studies in Higher Education, 30(1), 11–24.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1990). Social skills for successful group work. Educational Leadership, 47(4), 29–33.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2003). Learning together and alone: cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning (8th ed.). London: Allyn and Bacon.
Jones, C., & Dirckinck-Holmfeld, L. (2009). Analysing networked learning practices. In L. Dirckinck-Holmfeld, C. Jones, & B. Lindström (Eds.), Analysing networked learning practices in higher education and continuing professional development. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Jones, C., Dirckinck-Holmfeld, L., & Lindström, B. (2006). A relational, indirect, meso-level approach to CSCL design in the next decade. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1(1), 35–56.
Jones, C., & Healing, G. (2010). Networks and locations for student learning. Learning Media and Technology., 35(4), 369–385.
Koole, M. (2010). The web of identity: selfhood and belonging in online learning networks (pp. 241–248). Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Networked Learning 2010, ISBN 978-1-86220-225-2.
Kuutti, K. (1996). Activity theory as a potential framework for human-computer interaction research. In B. Nardi (Ed.), Context and consciousness: activity theory and human-computer interaction (pp. 17–44). Cambridge MA: MIT.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McConnell, D. (2006). E-learning groups and communities. Maidenhead: SRHE/OU Press.
Mead, G. H. (1967[1934]). Mind, self, and society: from the standpoint of a social behaviorist (Works of George Herbert Mead, Vol. 1) (1st ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6.
Prensky, M. (2010). Teaching digital natives: partnering for real learning. London: Sage.
Reynolds, M., Sclater, M., & Tickner, S. (2002). A critique of participative discourses adopted in networked learning. In S. Banks, P. Goodyear, V. Hodgson, & D. McConnell (Eds.), Networked learning 2002: a research based conference on e-learning in higher education and lifelong learning (p. 685). Sheffield, UK: University of Sheffield (ISBN 0902831 41 0).
Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: a learning theory for the digital age. http://itdl.org/journal/jan_05/article01.htm. Accessed April 1, 2011.
Siemens, G. (2006). Connectivism: learning and knowledge today. http://admin.edna.edu.au/dspace/bitstream/2150/34771/1/gs2006_siemens.pdf. Accessed April 1, 2011.
Stahl, G., Koschmann, T., & Suthers, D. (2006). Computer-supported collaborative learning: an historical perspective. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 409–426). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Available at http://GerryStahl.net/cscl/CSCL_English.pdf. Accessed March 22, 2011.
Willinsky, J. (2000). The social sciences as information technology. A political economy of practice. In P. Trifonas (Ed.), Revolutionary pedagogies. New York: Routledge Falmer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hodgson, V., McConnell, D., Dirckinck-Holmfeld, L. (2012). The Theory, Practice and Pedagogy of Networked Learning. In: Dirckinck-Holmfeld, L., Hodgson, V., McConnell, D. (eds) Exploring the Theory, Pedagogy and Practice of Networked Learning. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0496-5_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0496-5_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-0495-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-0496-5
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)