The purpose of this proposed chapter is twofold. First, we expand on the work of LaFree (1999), by compiling a summary of the cross-national research on social structure and homicide. Second, we provide a critical assessment of the status of this body of literature, presenting its strengths and weaknesses, noting points of convergence and divergence, and concluding with suggested directions for future research. Nearly 70 quantitative studies are included in our analysis, representing the most comprehensive list of peer-reviewed cross-national homicide studies to date. Although we are unable to draw strong general conclusions at this time, due in large part to inconsistencies in the operationalization and measurement of key theoretical constructs, it does appear that the literature may be beginning to converge in some key respects. On the other hand, our review also suggests that existing macrolevel explanations may not generalize across space and time. We use these conclusions to inform our suggestions for future research in attempting to determine the variation of national homicide rates.
- Gross Domestic Product
- Violent Crime
- Divorce Rate
- Homicide Rate
- Social Disorganization Theory
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use onlyLearn about institutional subscriptions
The age range that constituted “youth population” varied in the studies reviewed, though as noted by Land et al. (1990) several variations on the definition of this percentage are highly correlated, thus, “the particular age range used in a given study is not likely to be of great importance” (f.n. 9).
Agha, S. (2009). Structural correlates of female homicide: A cross-national analysis. Journal of Criminal Justice, 37, 576–585.
Altheimer, I. (2008). Social support, ethnic heterogeneity, and homicide: A cross-national approach. Journal of Criminal Justice, 36, 103–114.
Antonaccio, O., & Tittle, C. R. (2007). A cross-national test of Bonger’s theory of criminality and economic conditions. Criminology, 45, 925–958.
Archer, D., & Gartner, R. (1984). Violence and crime in cross-national perspective. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Avison, W. R., & Loring, P. L. (1986). Population diversity and cross-national homicide: The effects of inequality and heterogeneity. Criminology, 24, 733–749.
Barber, N. (2006). Why is violent crime so common in the Americas? Aggressive Behavior, 32, 442–450.
Bennett, R. R. (1991a). Development and crime: A cross-national time series analysis of competing models. Sociological Quarterly, 32, 343–363.
Bennett, R. R. (1991b). Routine activities: A cross-national assessment of a criminological perspective. Social Forces, 70, 147–163.
Bennett, R. R., & Lynch, J. P. (1990). Does a difference make a difference? Comparing cross-national crime indicators. Criminology, 28, 153–181.
Bjerregaard, B., & Cochran, J. K. (2008a). A cross-national test of institutional anomie theory: Do the strength of other social institutions mediate or moderate the effects of the economy on the rate of crime. Western Criminology Review, 9, 31–48.
Bjerregaard, B., & Cochran, J. K. (2008b). Want amid plenty: Developing and testing a cross-national measure of anomie. International Journal of Conflict and Violence, 2, 182–193.
Braithwaite, J. (1979). Inequality, crime and public policy. London, UK: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Braithwaite, J., & Braithwaite, V. (1980). The effect of income inequality and social democracy on homicide. British Journal of Criminology, 20, 45–57.
Chamlin, M. B., & Cochran, J. K. (2005). Ascribed economic inequality and homicide among modern societies: Toward the development of a cross-national theory. Homicide Studies, 9(1), 3–29.
Chamlin, M. B., & Cochran, J. K. (2006). Economic inequality, legitimacy, and cross-national homicide rates. Homicide Studies, 10, 231–252.
Cochran, J. K., & Bjerregaard, B. (2011). Structural anomie and crime: A cross-national test. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology Unpublished Manuscript.
Cole, J. H., & Gramajo, A. M. (2009). Homicide rates in a cross-section of countries: Evidence and interpretations. Population and Development Review, 35, 749–776.
Conklin, G. H., & Simpson, M. E. (1985). A demographic approach to the cross-national study of homicide. Comparative Social Research, 8, 171–185.
Fajnzylber, P., Lederman, D., & Loayza, N. (2002). Inequality and violent crime. Journal of Law and Economics, 45, 1–40.
Fox, J. A., & Zawitz, M. W. (1998). Homicide trends in the United States. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
Gartner, R. (1990). The victims of homicide: A temporal and cross-national comparison. American Sociological Review, 55, 92–106.
Gartner, R., & Parker, R. N. (1990). Cross-national evidence on homicide and the age structure of the population. Social Forces, 69, 351–371.
Groves, W. B., McCleary, R., & Newman, G. R. (1985). Religion, modernization, and world crime. Comparative Social Research, 8, 59–78.
Hansmann, H. B., & Quigley, J. M. (1982). Population heterogeneity and the sociogenesis of homicide. Social Forces, 61, 206–224.
He, N., Cao, L., Wells, W., & Maguire, E. R. (2003). Forces of production and direction: A test of an expanded model of suicide and homicide. Homicide Studies, 7, 36–57.
Howard, G. J., Newman, G., & Pridemore, W. A. (2000). Theory, method, and data in comparative criminology (Criminal justice 2000, volume 4: Measurement and analysis of crime and justice, pp. 139–211). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.
Huang, W. S. W. (1995). A cross-national analysis on the effect of moral individualism on murder rates. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 39, 63–75.
Huang, W. S. W. (2001). A research note on reporting discrepancies in international homicide data. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, 25, 167–181.
Jacobs, D., & Richardson, A. M. (2008). Economic inequality and homicide in the developed nations from 1975 to 1995. Homicide Studies, 12, 28–45.
Jensen, G. F. (2006). Religious cosmologies and homicide rates among nations. Journal of Religion and Society, 8, 1–14.
Kick, E. L., & LaFree, G. (1985). Development and the social context of murder and theft. Comparative Social Research, 8, 37–58.
Killias, M., & Aebi, M. F. (2000). Crime trends in Europe from 1990 to 1996: How Europe illustrates the limits of the American experience. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 8(1), 43–63.
Krahn, H., Hartnagel, T. F., & Gartrell, J. W. (1986). Income inequality and homicide rates: Cross-national data and criminological theories. Criminology, 24, 269–295.
Krohn, M. D. (1976). Inequality, unemployment and crime: A cross-national analysis. Sociological Quarterly, 17, 303–313.
Krohn, M. D. (1978). A Durkheimian analysis of international crime rates. Social Forces, 57, 654–670.
Krohn, M. D., & Wellford, C. F. (1977). A static and dynamic analysis of crime and the primary dimensions of nations. International Journal of Criminology and Penology, 5, 1–16.
LaFree, G. (1999). A summary and review of cross-national comparative studies of homicide. In M. D. Smith & M. A. Zahn (Eds.), Homicide: A sourcebook of social research (pp. 125–145). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
LaFree, G., & Drass, K. A. (2002). Counting crime booms among nations: Evidence for homicide victimization rates, 1956 to 1998. Criminology, 40, 769–800.
LaFree, G., & Kick, E. L. (1986). Cross-national effects of developmental, distributional, and demographic variables on crime: A review and analysis. International Annals of Criminology, 24, 213–236.
LaFree, G., & Tseloni, A. (2006). Democracy and crime: A multilevel analysis of homicide trends in forty-four countries, 1950–2000. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 605, 25–49.
Land, K. C., McCall, P. L., & Cohen, L. E. (1990). Structural covariates of homicide rates: Are there any invariances across time and social space? American Journal of Sociology, 95, 922–963.
Landau, S. F. (1984). Trends in violence and aggression: A cross-national analysis. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 25, 133–158.
Leavitt, G. C. (1992). General evolution and Durkheim’s hypothesis of crime frequency: A cross-cultural test. Sociological Quarterly, 33, 241–263.
Lederman, D., Loayza, N., & Menendez, A. M. (2002). Violent crime: Does social capital matter? Economic Development and Cultural Change, 50, 509–539.
Lee, M. R. (2001). Population growth, economic inequality, and homicide. Deviant Behavior, 22, 491–516.
Lee, M. R., & Bankston, W. B. (1999). Political structure, economic inequality, and homicide: A cross-national analysis. Deviant Behavior, 19, 27–55.
Li, D. (1995). Economic development, social control, and murder rates: A cross-national approach. Cross-Cultural Research, 1995, 361–382.
Lim, F., Bond, M. H., & Bond, M. K. (2005). Linking societal and psychological factors to homicide rates across nations. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 36, 515–536.
Lin, M. (2007). Does democracy increase crime? The evidence from international data. Journal of Comparative Economics, 35, 467–483.
McDonald, L. (1976). The sociology of law and order. Boulder, CO: Westview.
Messner, S. F. (1980). Income inequality and murder rates: Some cross-national findings. Comparative Social Research, 3, 185–198.
Messner, S. F. (1982). Societal development, social equality, and homicide: A cross-national test of a Durkheimian model. Social Forces, 61, 225–240.
Messner, S. F. (1985). Sex differences in arrest rates for homicide: An application of the general theory of structural strain. Comparative Social Research, 8, 187–201.
Messner, S. F. (1986). Modernization, structural characteristics, and societal rates of crime: An application of Blau’s macrosociological theory. The Sociological Quarterly, 27, 27–41.
Messner, S. F. (1989). Economic discrimination and societal homicide rates: Further evidence on the cost of inequality. American Sociological review, 54, 597–611.
Messner, S. F., Raffalovich, L. E., & Shrock, P. (2002). Reassessing the cross-national relationship between income inequality and homicide rates: Implications of data quality control in the measurement of income distribution. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 18, 377–395.
Messner, S. F., Raffalovich, L. E., & Sutton, G. M. (2010). Poverty, infant mortality, and homicide rates in cross-national perspective: Assessments of criterion and construct validity. Criminology, 48(2), 509–537.
Messner, S. F., & Rosenfeld, R. (1997). Political restraint of the market and levels of criminal homicide: A cross-national application of institutional-anomie theory. Social Forces, 75, 1393–1416.
Neapolitan, J. L. (1994). Cross-national variation in homicides: The case of Latin America. International Criminal Justice Review, 4, 4–22.
Neapolitan, J. L. (1996). Cross-national crime data: Some unaddressed problems. Journal of Criminal Justice, 19, 95–112.
Neapolitan, J. L. (1997). Homicides in developing nations: Results of research using a large and representative sample. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 41, 358–374.
Neapolitan, J. L. (1998). Cross-national variation in homicides: Is race a factor? Criminology, 36, 139–156.
Neapolitan, J. L. (1999). A comparative analysis of nations with low and high levels of violent crime. Journal of Criminal Justice, 27(3), 259–274.
Neumayer, E. (2003). Good policy can lower violent crime: Evidence from a cross-national panel of homicide rates, 1980–1997. Journal of Peace Research, 40, 619–640.
Ortega, S. T., Corzine, J., Burnett, C., & Poyer, T. (1992). Modernization, age structure and regional context: A cross-national study of crime. Sociological Spectrum, 12, 257–277.
Pampel, F. C., & Gartner, R. (1995). Age structure, socio-political institutions, and national homicide rates. European Sociological Review, 11, 243–260.
Pampel, F. C., & Williamson, J. B. (2001). Age patterns of suicide and homicide mortality rates in high-income nations. Social Forces, 80, 251–282.
Paré, P. P., & Felson, R. (2010). Income inequality, poverty, and crime across nations reexamined. Unpublished Manuscript.
Pratt, T. C., & Godsey, T. W. (2002). Social support and homicide: A cross-national test of an emerging criminological theory. Journal of Criminal Justice, 30, 589–601.
Pratt, T. C., & Godsey, T. W. (2003). Social support, inequality, and homicide: A cross-national test of an integrated theoretical model. Criminology, 41, 611–643.
Pridemore, W. A. (2008). A methodological addition to the cross-national empirical literature on social structure and homicide: A first test of the poverty-homicide thesis. Criminology, 46, 133–154.
Pridemore, W. A. (2011). Poverty matters: A reassessment of the inequality-homicide relationship in cross-national studies. British Journal of Criminology forthcoming.
Pridemore, W. A., & Trent, C. L. S. (2010). Do the invariant findings of Land, McCall, and Cohen generalize to cross-national studies of social structure and homicide? Homicide Studies, 14(3), 296–335.
Quinney, R. (1965). Suicide, homicide, and economic development. Social Forces, 43, 401–406.
Ray, J. L., & Singer, J. D. (1973). Measuring the concentration of power in the international system. Sociological Methods and Research, 1, 403–437.
Rosenfeld, R., & Messner, S. F. (1991). The social sources of homicide in different types of societies. Sociological Forum, 6, 51–70.
Savolainen, J. (2000). Inequality, welfare state, and homicide: Further support for the institutional anomie theory. Criminology, 38, 1021–1042.
Schaible, L. M., & Hughes, L. A. (2011). Crime, shame, reintegration, and cross-national homicide: A partial test of reintegrative shaming theory. The Sociological Quarterly, 52, 104–131.
Shichor, D. (1990). Crime patterns and socioeconomic development: A cross-national analysis. Criminal Justice Review, 15, 64–77.
Stamatel, J. P. (2009a). Correlates of national-level homicide variation in post-communist East-Central Europe. Social Forces, 87, 1423–1448.
Stamatel, J. P. (2009b). Contributions of cross-national research to criminology at the beginning of the 21st century. In M. D. Krohn, A. J. Lizotte, & G. Penly (Eds.), Handbook on crime and deviance (pp. 3–22). New York, NY: Springer.
Unnithan, N. P., & Whitt, H. P. (1992). Inequality, economic development and lethal violence: A cross-national analysis of suicide and homicide. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 33, 182–196.
Van Wilsem, J. (2004). Criminal victimization in cross-national perspective: An analysis of theft, violence and vandalism across 27 countries. European Journal of Criminology, 1, 89–109.
Wellford, C. F. (1974). Crime and the dimensions of nations. International Journal of Criminology and Penology, 2, 1–10.
Wolf, P. (1971). Crime and development: An international comparison of crime rates. Scandinavian Studies in Criminology, 3, 107–120.
Editors and Affiliations
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Trent, C.L.S., Pridemore, W.A. (2012). A Review of the Cross-National Empirical Literature on Social Structure and Homicide. In: Liem, M., Pridemore, W. (eds) Handbook of European Homicide Research. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0466-8_7
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-0465-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-0466-8