Advertisement

Homicide and Punishment in Europe: Examining National Variation

  • Michael C. Campbell
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter examines punishment for homicide in Europe by analyzing statistical data on how various nations sanction homicide offenders. It presents a general survey of existing data on the complex and varied ways that European nations punish these serious offenders, revealing considerable variation across the continent. Officially, most European nations retain very long periods of incarceration, usually life imprisonment, as the sanction for the most serious homicide infractions. But in practice, few offenders are ever prosecuted and sentenced under the law’s most serious infraction. Instead, many European homicide offenders are sentenced for 10–20 years, and rarely serve full terms due to a variety of penal and administrative processes that mitigate incarceration during the punishment phase. This is less the case in English speaking nations and in Eastern European countries. The United Kingdom and the Russian Federation impose long prison sentences on many homicide offenders, and are increasingly turning to life sentences. Although data limitations severely limit any comprehensive assessment of punishment for homicide in Europe, this chapter helps sketch general trends, and raises questions about how to explain the considerable differences found across the continent.

Keywords

Incarceration Rate Political Culture Homicide Rate European Nation Harsh Punishment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Aebi, M. F. (2004). Crime trends in Western Europe from 1990–2000. European Journal of Criminal Policy and Research, 10, 163–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aebi, M. F., & Delgrande, N. (2010). Council of Europe annual penal statistics: Space I. Council of Europe. Document Number.Google Scholar
  3. Aebi, M., & Linde, A. (2012). Regional variation in Europe. In M. C. A. Liem & W. A. Pridemore (Eds.), Handbook of European Homicide Research. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  4. Appleton, C., & Grover, B. (2007). The pros and cons of life without parole. British Journal of Criminology, 47, 597–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beckett, K., & Sasson, T. (2000). The politics of injustice: Crime and punishment in America. Thousand Oaks: Pine Forge Press.Google Scholar
  6. Campbell, M. (2007). Criminal disenfranchisement reform in California: A deviant case study. Punishment & Society, 9, 177–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. (2000). European Union: Official Journal of the European Communities. Accessed online 12/6/2010 http://www.europarl.europa.eu/charter/pdf/text_en.pdf.
  8. Daems, T. (2007). Engaging with penal populism: The case of France. Punishment & Society, 9(3), 319–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Eisner, M., & Killias, M. (2004). Switzerland. European Journal of Criminology, 1(2), 257–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Europe, C. o. (2010). European Sourcebook of Crime and Criminal Justice Statistics o. Document Number.Google Scholar
  11. European Sourcebook of Crime and Criminal Justice Statistics. (2010). In M. F. Aebi, B. A. de Cavarlay, G. Barclay, B. Gruszczyńska, S. Harrendorf, M. Heiskanen, V. Hysi, V. Jaquier, J. -M. Jehle, M. Killias, O. Shostko, P. Smit & R. Þórisdóttir (4th eds). Institut de criminologie et de droit pénal, at Universite de Lausanne.Google Scholar
  12. Gapat, S., & Liem, M. (2012). Homicide in the Netherlands. In M. C. A. Liem & W. A. Pridemore & (Eds.), Handbook of European Homicide Research. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  13. Garland, D. (2001). The culture of control: Crime and social order in contemporary society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  14. Garland, D. (2004). Beyond the culture of control. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 7(2), 160–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Garland, D. (2007). High crime societies and cultures of control. In H. Hess, L. Ostermeier & B. Paul (Eds.), Kriminologisches Journal Special Issue on “Texte zur Kriminalpolitik im Anschluss an David Garland” 39 Jg 9 Beiheft.Google Scholar
  16. Granath, S. (2012). Homicide in Sweden. In M. C. A Liem & W. A. Pridemore & (Eds.), Handbook of European Homicide Research. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  17. Hodgkinson, P. (2004). Alternatives to the death penalty – The United Kingdom experience. In Co Europe (Ed.), The death penalty: Beyond abolition (pp. 159–190). Strasbourg: Council of Europe.Google Scholar
  18. International, A. (2010). Countries Abolitionist for all Crimes. Retrieved April 1, 2010, from http://www.amnesty.org/en/death-penalty/countries-abolitionist-for-all-crimes
  19. Kerezsi, K., & Levay, M. (2008). Criminology, crime and criminal justice in Hungary. European Journal of Criminology, 5(2), 239–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lambropoulou, E. (2005). Crime, criminal justice and criminology in Greece. European Journal of Criminology, 2(2), 211–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lehti, M., & Kivivuori, J. (2012). Homicide in Finland. In W. A. Pridemore & M. Liem (Eds.), Handbook of European Homicide Research. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  22. Maffei, S., & Betsos, I. M. (2007). Crime and criminal policy in Italy: Tradition and modernity in a troubled country. European Journal of Criminology, 4(4), 461–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Maillard, J. D., & Roche, S. (2004). Crime and justice in France: Time trends, policies and political debate. European Journal of Criminology, 1(1), 111–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Manza, J., & Uggen, C. (2006). Locked out: Felon ­disenfranchisement and American democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mauer, M., & Chesney-Lind, M. (Eds.). (2002). Invisible punishment: The collateral consequences of mass incarceration. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
  26. Oberwittler, D., & Hofer, S. (2005). Crime and justice in Germany. European Journal of Criminology, 2(4), 465–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pridemore, W. A., Lysova, A., & Shchitov, N. (2012). Homicide in Russia, Ukraine, and Belarus. In M. C. A. Liem & W. A. Pridemore (Eds.), Handbook of European Homicide Research. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  28. Russian Criminal Code, Section 7, Chapter 16, Article 105. (2004). Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe, LegislationLine. Accessed online 12/6/2010 http://www.legislationline.org/documents/section/criminal-codes.
  29. Simon, J. (2007). Governing through crime: How the war on crime transformed American democracy and created a culture of fear. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Tonry, M. (2007). Determinants of penal policies. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime, punishment, and politics in comparative perspective, crime and justice: A review of research (Vol. 36, pp. 1–48). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  31. Tonry, M. (2009). Thinking about punishment: Penal ­policy across space, time and discipline. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  32. UN. (2009). International Homicide Statistics 2004 o. Document Number.Google Scholar
  33. Walmsley, R. (2010). World prison population list (8th ed.). Kings College, Londono. Document Number.Google Scholar
  34. Whitman, J. Q. (2005). Harsh justice: Criminal punishment and the widening divide between America and Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyNorthern Illinois UniversityDeKalbUSA

Personalised recommendations