Abstract
In Chaps. 1 through 5 we discussed the solution of discrete, lumped-parameter models. For multiple degree of freedom systems, we employed modal analysis to enable us to transform the coupled equations of motion in local (model) coordinates into modal coordinates. In this coordinate frame, the equations of motion were uncoupled and we could apply single degree of freedom solution techniques. In Chap. 6 we shifted our attention to the “backwards problem,” which is representative of a common task for vibration engineers. In this problem, we begin with measurements of an existing structure and use this information to develop a model. We again used discrete models to describe the system behavior.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
A beam can be described as a structure where one dimension is much larger than the other two dimensions.
- 2.
A simply supported beam is pinned at one end and has a rolling support at the other.
- 3.
We consider the resonant case because this is where damping has the most significant effect. Its influence is less at frequencies far from resonance.
- 4.
For a continuous beam there are an infinite number of modes for an infinite bandwidth.
- 5.
The authors credit Dr. W.T. Estler (retired, National Institute of Standards and Technology) with this figure.
- 6.
The beam’s cross section is not required to be circular as in the torsion vibration analysis in Sect. 8.7.
- 7.
This means that the beam’s expansion and contraction in the directions normal to the oscillating axial deflection are ignored.
References
Bishop R, Johnson D (1960) The mechanics of vibration. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Blevins RD (2001) Formulas for natural frequency and mode shape. Krieger, Malabar (Table 8–1)
Chapra S, Canale R (1985) Numerical methods for engineers with personal computer applications. McGraw-Hill, New York (Section 7.1)
Hutchinson J (2001) Shear coefficients for Timoshenko beam theory. J Appl Mech 68:87–92
Weaver W Jr, Timoshenko S, Young D (1990) Vibration problems in engineering, 5th edn. Wiley, New York (Section 5.12)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Exercises
Exercises
-
1.
Consider a uniform cross section fixed-free (i.e., clamped-free or cantilever) beam.
-
(a)
Sketch the first bending mode shape (lowest natural frequency).
-
(b)
Sketch the second mode shape (next lowest natural frequency).
-
(c)
On your sketches in parts (a) and (b), identify any node location(s).
-
(a)
-
2.
In describing beam vibrations using Euler–Bernoulli beam theory, we derived the equation of motion \( \left( {{{{{\partial^{\,4}}Y}} \left/ {{\partial {x^4}}} \right.}} \right) - {\lambda^4}Y = 0 \) .
-
(a)
In the equation of motion, what does x represent physically?
-
(b)
In the equation of motion, what does Y represent physically?
-
(c)
Write the equation for λ (it replaces several other variables) and describe what each variable represents (include the SI units).
-
(a)
-
3.
Consider a fixed-free beam. The general solution to the equation of motion can be written as \( Y(x) = A\cos \left( {\lambda x} \right) + B\sin \left( {\lambda x} \right) + C\cosh \left( {\lambda x} \right) + D\sinh \left( {\lambda x} \right) \). To determine the four coefficients, A through D, four boundary conditions are required. Write the four boundary conditions (in the table) as a function of x and y for the beam shown in Fig. P8.3.
At x = 0
At x = L
1.
3.
2.
4.
-
4.
Consider the free-sliding beam shown in Fig. P8.4a. Direct and cross FRFs were measured at six locations and the imaginary parts are provided for the frequency interval near its second bending natural frequency of 350 Hz in Figs. P8.4b–P8.4g. Given the FRF data, sketch the mode shape corresponding to the second natural frequency. Normalize the mode shape to a value of 1 at the free end.
-
5.
Complete the following for the transverse deflection of a free-free cylindrical beam. The beam’s diameter is 15 mm and it is 480 mm long. The beam material is 6061-T6 aluminum with \( \rho = 2,\!700\,{\hbox{kg}}/{{\hbox{m}}^{{3}}} \), \( E = 70\,{\hbox{GPa}} \), \( \nu = 0.35 \), \( G = {{E} \left/ {{2\left( {1 + \nu } \right)}} \right.} \), and \( \eta = 0.002 \).
-
(a)
Plot the transverse deflection FRF over a frequency range of 10,000 Hz. Use a semi-logarithmic scale.
-
(b)
How many modes are captured in this bandwidth (excluding the rigid body modes)?
-
(c)
What is the natural frequency of the first (non-rigid) bending mode?
-
(a)
-
6.
Complete the following for the torsion vibration of a free-free cylindrical beam. The beam’s diameter is 15 mm and it is 480 mm long. The beam material is 6061-T6 aluminum with \( \rho = 2,\!700\,{\hbox{kg}}/{{\hbox{m}}^{{3}}} \), \( E = 70\,{\hbox{GPa}} \), \( \nu = 0.35 \), \( G = {{E} \left/ {{2\left( {1 + \nu } \right)}} \right.} \), and \( \eta = 0.002 \).
-
(a)
Plot the torsion FRF over a frequency range of 10,000 Hz. Use a semi-logarithmic scale.
-
(b)
How many modes are captured in this bandwidth (excluding the rigid body mode)?
-
(c)
What is the natural frequency of the first (non-rigid) torsion mode?
-
(a)
-
7.
Complete the following for the axial vibration of a free-free cylindrical beam. The beam’s diameter is 15 mm and it is 480 mm long. The beam material is 6061-T6 aluminum with \( \rho = 2,\!700\,{\hbox{kg}}/{{\hbox{m}}^{{3}}} \), \( E = 70\,{\hbox{GPa}} \), \( \nu = 0.35 \), \( G = {{E} \left/ {{2\left( {1 + \nu } \right)}} \right.} \), and \( \eta = 0.002 \).
-
(a)
Plot the axial FRF over a frequency range of 10,000 Hz. Use a semi-logarithmic scale.
-
(b)
How many modes are captured in this bandwidth (excluding the rigid body mode)?
-
(c)
What is the natural frequency of the first (non-rigid) torsion mode?
-
(a)
-
8.
Consider the transverse vibration of a free-free cylindrical beam. If the diameter of a solid beam is d, determine the outer diameter, d o , of a hollow beam with the same length and material properties to give the same natural frequencies as the solid beam if the inner diameter, d i , is one-half of the outer diameter, \( {d_i} = 0.5{d_o} \).
-
9.
For a 25 mm diameter 6061-T6 aluminum rod (\( \rho = 2,\!700\,{\hbox{kg}}/{{\hbox{m}}^{{3}}} \) and \( E = 70\,{\hbox{GPa}} \)) with a nominal length of 190 mm and an associated uncertainty of 0.2 mm, determine the uncertainty in the second bending natural frequency, \( u\left( {{f_{{n,2}}}} \right) \) (in Hz), if free-free boundary conditions are imposed. You may neglect the uncertainty in E, ρ, and d.
-
10.
The Timoshenko beam model is more accurate than the Euler–Bernoulli beam model because it includes the effects of ______________ and ______________.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Schmitz, T.L., Smith, K.S. (2012). Continuous Beam Modeling. In: Mechanical Vibrations. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0460-6_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0460-6_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-0459-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-0460-6
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)