Integrated Control-Path Design and Error Recovery



Recent advances in digital microfluidics have led to tremendous interest in miniaturized lab-on-chip devices for biochemical analysis. Synthesis tools have also emerged for the automated design of lab-on-chip from the specifications of laboratory protocols. However, none of these tools consider control flow or address the problem of recovering from fluidic errors that can occur during on-chip bioassay execution.


Completion Time Clock Cycle Error Limit Fluidic Error Sequencing Graph 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Y. Zhao, T. Xu, K. Chakrabarty, Control-path design and error recovery in digital microfluidic lab-on-chip. ACM J. Emerg. Technol. Comput. Syst. 6, 11.1–11.28 (2010)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    S.-Y. Cho, S.-W. Seo, M.A. Brooke, N.M. Jokerst, Integrated detectors for embedded optical interconnections on electrical boards, modules, and integrated circuits. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 8, 1427–1434 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    S.-W. Seo, K.-K. Lee, S. Kang, S. Huang, W.A. Doolittle, N.M. Jokerst, A.S. Brown, M.A. Brooke, The heterogeneous integration of GaN thin-film metal-semiconductor-metal photodetectors onto silicon. IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 14, 185–187 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    L. Luan, R.D. Evans, N.M. Jokerst, R.B. Fair, Integrated optical sensor in a digital microfluidic platform. IEEE Sens. J. 8, 628–635 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    G. Minas, J.C. Ribeiro, R.F. Wolffenbuttel, J.H. Correia, On-chip integrated CMOS optical detection microsystem for spectrophotometric analyses in biological microfluidic systems. in Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Industrial, Electronics, (2005), pp. 1133–1138Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    V. Srinivasan, V.K. Pamula, M.G. Pollack, R.B. Fair, Clinical diagnositics on human whole blood, plasma, serum, urine, saliva, sweat, and tears on a digital microfluidic platform. in Proceedings of MicroTAS, (2003), pp. 1287–1290Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    B.C. Madsen, R.J. Murphy, Flow-injection and photometric determination of sulfate rainwater with methythymol blue. Anal. Chem. 53, 1924–1926 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    M.G. Pollack, Electrowetting-Based Microactuation of Droplets for Digital Microfluidics. Ph.D. thesis, Duke University, Durham, NC, 2001Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    J.R. Taylor, An Introduction to Error Analysis: the Study of Uncertainties of Physical Measurements (University Science Books, Mill Valley, 1982)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    F. Su, K. Chakrabarty, Unified high-level synthesis and module placement for defect-tolerant microfluidic biochips. Proceedings of the IEEE/ACM Design Automation Conference, (2005), pp. 825–830Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    V. Srinivasan, V.K. Pamula, P. Paik, R.B. Fair, Protein stamping for MALDI mass spectrometry using an electrowetting-based microfluidic platform. Proc. Soc. Photogr. Instrum. Eng. 5591, 26–32 (2004)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    H. Ren, Electrowetting-Based Sample Preparation: An Initial Study for Droplet Transportation, Creation and On-chip Digital Dilution. Ph.D. thesis, Duke University, Durham, NC, 2004Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Advanced Micro DevicesNashuaUSA
  2. 2.Duke University ECEDurhamUSA

Personalised recommendations