Skip to main content

Abstract

There are many reasons to record from peripheral nerve in an operating room setting. These include “monitoring” functions for the purpose of providing an ongoing evaluation of peripheral nerve function during procedures that place the nerve at risk. Examples of such procedures would be hip replacement surgery, thyroid/parathyroid surgery, and any procedures that would place peripheral nerves at exaggerated risk for positioning palsies. These recordings will have much in common with recordings made for the purpose of facilitating diagnosis of a nerve lesion. The latter is perhaps a more significant reason to record from peripheral nerve, to provide diagnostic information relating to nerve injury. The purpose of this chapter is to provide emphasis on this subject. In this case, recordings obtained during surgery can provide definitive information that allows the surgeon to make informed decisions. An accurate diagnosis of a peripheral nerve problem at the time of surgery allows the surgeon to provide the optimal method to deal with the pathology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Kline D. Evaluation of neuroma in continuity. In: Omer G, Spinner M, VanBeek A, editors. Management of peripheral nerve problems. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sunderland S. Nerves and nerve injuries. 2nd ed. Edinburgh: Churchill-Livingstone; 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Happel L, Kline D. Intraoperative neurophysiology of the peripheral nervous system. In: Deletis V, Shils J, editors. Neurophysiology in neurosurgery. New York: Academic; 2002. p. 169–94.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Nelson KR. Use of peripheral nerve action potentials for intraoperative monitoring. Neurol Clin. 1988;6:917–33.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Oberle J, Antoniadis G, Ruth S, Richter H. Value of nerve action potentials in surgical management of traumatic nerve lesions. Neurosurg. 1997;41(6):1337–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Collins W, O’Leary J, Hunt W, Schwartz H. An electrophysiological study of nerve regeneration in the cat. J Neurosurg. 1955;12:39–46.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kline DG, Happel LT. Penfield lecture. A quarter century’s experience with intraoperative nerve action potential recording. Can J Neurol Sci. 1993;20(1):3–10.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Williamsec HB, Terzis JK. Single fascicular recordings: an intraoperative diagnostic tool for the management of peripheral nerve lesions. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1976;57:562–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Happel L, Kline D. Nerve lesions in continuity. In: Gelberman R, editor. Operative nerve repair and reconstruction, vol. 1. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott; 1991. p. 601–16.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kline DG, Hackett ER. Reappraisal of timing for exploration of civilian peripheral nerve injuries. Surgery. 1975;78:54–65.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Tiel R, Happel L, Kline D. Nerve action potential recording method and equipment. Neurosurgery. 1996;39(1):103–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Holland NR, Lukaczyk TA, Riley III LH, Kostuik JP. Higher electrical stimulus intensities are required to activate chronically compressed nerve roots. Spine. 1998;23(2):224–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kline D. Nerve action potential recordings. In: Kim DH, Midha R, Murovic JA, Spinner R, editors. Nerve injuries. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Dorfman L, Cummins KL. conduction velocity distributions: a population approach to electrophysiology of nerve. New York: WR Liss; 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kimura J. Clinical consequences of demyelination. In: Eloectrodiagnosis in diseases of nerve and muscle: principles and practice. 3rd ed. New York: Oxford Press; 2001. p. 82.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leo T. Happel .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Happel, L.T. (2012). Surgery in the Peripheral Nervous System. In: Koht, A., Sloan, T., Toleikis, J. (eds) Monitoring the Nervous System for Anesthesiologists and Other Health Care Professionals. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0308-1_35

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0308-1_35

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-0307-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-0308-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics