The Politics of Migrant Family Drama: Mainland Chinese Immigrants in Singapore

Chapter

Abstract

This chapter attempts to unfold the family drama of mainland Chinese migrants in Singapore in terms of their gender and generation politics—the interpersonal as well as role conflicts within the domestic domain as they were engendered and negotiated during the migration process. The “better life” promise of migration for each and every family member was scrutinised—each time gazing at a different member in the context of his or her institutionalised position in the family. As it happened, divided rather than common interests emerged. Not all benefited from moving. Yet all were convinced of the family having made “the right move”. The social construction of the family was further strengthened by transnationalism, which reproduced the “reality” of family solidarity through mundane everyday life activities acted out across borders. But when internalised as a construct, an ideal, the family bonded its members—thus its internal cohesiveness. It also bound and controlled the self. Sure there were gains, but there were also losses, especially on the part of the less powerful. Globalization and transnationalism have yet to fulfil their promises.

References

  1. Aronson, E. (1972). The social animal. New York: W.H. Freeman & Company.Google Scholar
  2. Berger, P. L. (1963). Invitation to sociology: A humanistic perspective. Garden City, NY: Doubleday & Co.Google Scholar
  3. Boyd, M. (1989). Family and personal networks in international migration: Recent developments and new agendas. International Migration Review, 23(3), 638–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chan, K. B., & Dorais, L. J. (1998). Family, identity and the Vietnamese Diaspora: The Quebec experience. Sojourn, 13, 285–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Court, C. (1997). Introduction to sociology. Wirral, Merseyside: Tudor.Google Scholar
  6. Day, L. H., & Icduygu, A. (1997). The consequences of international migration for the status of women: A Turkish study. International Migration, 35, 337–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Delphy, C., & Leonard, D. (1992). Familiar exploitation: A new analysis of marriage in contemporary western societies. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  8. Eichler, M. (1997). Family shifts: Families, policies and gender equality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Fawcett, J. T., & Arnold, F. (1987). Explaining diversity: Asian and pacific immigration systems. In J. T. Fawcett & B. V. Cariño (Eds.), Pacific bridges: The new immigration from Asia and the pacific islands (pp. 453–473). New York: Centre for Migration Studies.Google Scholar
  10. Foner, N. (1997a). What’s new about transnationalism? New York immigrants today and at the turn of the century. Diaspora, 6, 355–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Foner, N. (1997b). The immigrant family: Cultural legacies and cultural changes. International Migration Review, 31, 361–374.Google Scholar
  12. Foucault, M. (1971). Madness and civilization: A history of insanity in the age of reason. London: Tavistock Publisher.Google Scholar
  13. Griffin, K. (1976). On the emigration of the peasantry. World Development, 4, 353–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hendrix, L. (1979). Kinship, social class, and migration. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 41, 339–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hugo, G. (1995). International labor migration and the family: Some observations from Indonesia. Asian and Pacific Migration Journal, 4, 273–297.Google Scholar
  16. Kamiar, M. S., & Ismail, H. F. (1991). Family ties and economic stability concerns of migrant labour families in Jordan. International Migration, 29, 561–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Khaled, L. (1995). Migration and women’s status: The Jordan case. International Migration, 33, 235–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kibria, N. (1993). Family tightrope: The changing lives of Vietnamese Americans. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Kritz, M. M., & Zlotnick, H. (1992). A migration system approach. In M. M. Kritz, L. L. Lim, & J. H. Zlotnick (Eds.), International migration systems: A global approach. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  20. Laing, R. D. (1972). The politics of the family and other essays. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  21. Liu, X.-F. (1994). A case study of the labour market status of recent mainland Chinese immigrants in metropolitan Toronto. International Migration, 34(4), 583–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mincer, J. (1978). Family migration decisions. Journal of Political Economy, 86, 749–773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Morokvasic, M. (1984). Birds of passage are also women. International Migration Review, 18, 886–907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ngo, Hang-yue. (1994). The economic role of immigrant wives in Hong Kong. International Migration, 32(3), 403–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pan, L. (Ed.). (1998). The encyclopaedia of the Chinese overseas. Singapore: Archipelago Press.Google Scholar
  26. Pearse, A. (1970). Urbanization and the incorporation of the peasant. In A. J. Field (Ed.), City and country in the third world: Issues in the modernization of Latin America. Cambridge, MA: Schenkman.Google Scholar
  27. Pedraza, S. (1991). Women and migration: The social consequences of gender. Annual Review of Sociology, 17, 303–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Perez, L. (1986). Immigrant economic adjustment and family organization: The Cuban success story re-examined. International Migration Review, 20, 4–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pessar, P. R. (1998). Engendering migration studies: The case of new immigrants in the United States. The American Behavioral Scientist, 42(4), 577–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pohjola, A. (1991). Social networks – help or hindrance to the migrant? International Migration, 29(3), 435–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Portes, A., Guarnizo, L. E., & Landolt, P. (1999). The Study of Transnationalism: Pitfalls and promise of an emergent research field. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 22, 217–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Poston, D. L., & Yu, M.-Y. (1990). The distribution of the overseas Chinese in the contemporary world. International Migration Review, 24, 480–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pryor, R. J. (1979). Southeast Asia: Migration and development. In R. J. Pryor (Ed.), Migration and development in Southeast Asia: a demographic perspective. Kuala Lumpur: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Russell, S. S. (1979). Migrant remittances and development. International Migration, 30(3/4), 267–287.Google Scholar
  35. Sagar, A. (1997). Homes and postcoloniality. Diaspora, 6, 237–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sassen-Koab, A. (1983). Labor migration and the new international division of labor. In J. Nash & M. Fernandez-Kelly (Eds.), Women, men and the international division of labor. New York: State University of New York.Google Scholar
  37. Schiller, N. G., Basch, L., & Blanc, C. S. (1999). From immigrant to transmigrant: Theorizing transnational migration. In P. Ludger (Ed.), Migration and transnational social spaces. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  38. Shihadeh, E. S. (1991). The prevalence of husband-centred migration: Employment consequences for married mothers. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 53, 432–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Simmel, G. (1908). The Stranger. In G. Simmel (Ed.), Soziologie. Leipzig: Duncker and Humbolt.Google Scholar
  40. Simon, R. J., & Brettel, C. (1986). International migration: The female experience. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Allanheld Publishers.Google Scholar
  41. Sjaastad, L. A. (1962). The costs and returns of human migration. Journal of Political Economy, 70, 80–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Skeldon, R. (1992a). On mobility and fertility transitions in East and Southeast Asia. Asia and Pacific Migration Journal, 1(2), 220–248.Google Scholar
  43. Skeldon, R. (1992b). International migration within and from the East and Southeast Asian region: A review essay. Asia and Pacific Migration Journal, 1(2), 19–59.Google Scholar
  44. Sowell, T. (1996). Migrations and cultures: A world view. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  45. Vertovec, S. (1999). Conceiving and researching transnationalism. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 22, 447–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Chan Institute of Social Studies (CISS)Hong KongChina
  2. 2.Department of StatisticsGovernment of SingaporeSingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations