Regional Embeddedness of Multinational Enterprises in European Regions

Chapter
Part of the Innovation, Technology, and Knowledge Management book series (ITKM)

Abstract

It is often argued that multinational enterprises (MNEs) act space-less in the global economy and that they are an essential mechanism in the internationalization of the transfer of knowledge and technologies. The existence of international inner-organizational learning and synergy effects distinguishes MNEs from market-based exchange relationships and national companies (The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, 2005). With their knowledge accumulating and processing capacities, MNEs can use product, production, distribution, and development competences, which they accumulated in their homeland and in all other socio-cultural and institutional contexts where branch plants are located. In this respect, MNEs can combine the advantages of globally-coordinated product and production strategies with the advantages of local proximity and specific locational factors (Management International Review 40:127–148, 2000).

This contribution deals with the regional embeddedness of MNEs in their innovation activities. We depict those regional characteristics which either show a high or a low propensity for the location of MNEs and for which a high or low regional embeddedness of the enterprises could be anticipated.

Keywords

Public Research European Region Tacit Knowledge Innovative Activity Market Environment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Amin, A. and Thrift, N. (1992): Neo-Marshallian nodes in global networks, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 16, 571–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andersen, P.H. and Christensen, P.R. (2005): From localized to corporate excellence: How do MNCs extract, combine and disseminate sticky knowledge from regional innovation systems? DRUID Working Paper No. 0516. Frederiksberg, Aalborg: DRUID.Google Scholar
  3. Asheim, B.T. and Gertler, M.S. (2005): The Geography of Innovation: Regional Innovation Systems. In: Fagerberg, J., Mowery, D.C. and Nelson, R.R. (eds.): The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. New York: Oxford University Press, 291–317.Google Scholar
  4. Backhaus, K., Erichson, B., Plinke, W. and Weiber, R. (2006): Multivariate Analysemethoden. 11. Auflage. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  5. Bathelt, H. and Glückler, J. (2002): Wirtschaftsgeographie. Ökonomische Beziehungen in räumlicher Perspektive. Stuttgart: Eugen Ulmer.Google Scholar
  6. Bathelt, H., Malmberg, A. and Maskell, P. (2004): Clusters and knowledge: local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation, Progress in Human Geography 28, 31–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Breschi, S. and Malerba, F. (1997): Sectoral systems of innovation: technological regimes, Schumpeterian dynamics and spatial boundaries. In: Edquist, C. (Ed.): Systems of Innovation. London: Pinter, 130–156.Google Scholar
  8. Buckley, P.J. and Casson, M.C. (1998): Models of the multinational enterprise, Journal of International Business Studies 29, 21–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bunnell, T.G. and Coe, N.M. (2001): Spaces and scales of innovation, Progress in Human Geography 25, 569–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Camagni, R. (Ed.) (1991): Innovation networks: spatial perspectives. London: Belhaven.Google Scholar
  11. Cantwell, J. and Mudambi, R. (2000): The Location of MNE R&D Activity: The Role of Investment Incentives, Management International Review 40, 127–148.Google Scholar
  12. Cantwell, J. and Piscitello, L. (2002): The location of technological activities of MNCs in European regions: The role of spillovers and local competencies, Journal of International Management 8, 69–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chandler, A.D. (1992): Organizational Capabilities and the Economic History of the Industrial Enterprise, Journal of Economic Perspectives 6, 79–100.Google Scholar
  14. Coe, N. M., Hess, M., Yeung, H.W., Dicken, P. and Henderson, J. (2004): “Globalizing” regional development: A global production networks perspective, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 29, 468–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cooke, P., Heidenreich, M. and Braczyk, H.-J. (Eds.) (2004): Regional Innovation Systems. The role of governance in a globalized world. Second edition. London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Defever, F. (2006): Functional fragmentation and the location of multi-national firms in an enlarged Europe, Regional Science and Urban Economics 34, 658–677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dosi, G. (1988): The Nature of the Innovative Process. In: Dosi, G., Freeman, C., Nelson, R., Silverberg, G. and Soete, L. (Eds.): Technical Change and Economic Theory. London/New York: Pinter Publishers, 221–238.Google Scholar
  18. Drucker, P.F. (1985): Innovation and Entrepreneurship. Practice and Principles. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  19. Dunning, J.H. (1988): Multinationals, technology and competitiveness. London: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar
  20. Dunning, J.H. (2000): Regions, Globalization, and the Knowledge Economy: The Issue Stated. In: Dunning, J.H. (Ed.): Regions, Globalization and the Knowledge-Based Economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 7–41.Google Scholar
  21. Edler, J., Döhrn, R. and Rothgang, M. (2003): Internationalisierung industrieller Forschung und grenzüberschreitendes Wissensmanagement. Eine empirische Analyse aus der Perspektive des Standortes Deutschland. Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Edquist, C. (2005): Systems of Innovation. Perspectives and Challenges. In: Fagerberg, J.; Mowery, D.C. and Nelson, R.R. (eds.): The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, New York: Oxford University Press, 181–208.Google Scholar
  23. Edquist, C. (Ed.) (1997): Systems of Innovation. Technologies, Institutions and Organizations. London: Pinter Publishers.Google Scholar
  24. Enright, M.J. (2000): Regional Clusters and Multinational Enterprises, International Studies of Management & Organization 30, 114–138.Google Scholar
  25. European Commission (2005): Monitoring industrial research: the 2005 EU industrial R&D investment SCOREBOARD. Volume II: Company Data. Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
  26. Freeman, C. and Soete, L. (1997): The Economics of Industrial Innovation. Third Edition. London: Pinter Publishers.Google Scholar
  27. Geenhuizen, M.v. (2007): Modelling dynamics of knowledge networks and local connectedness: a case study of urban high-tech companies in The Netherlands, The Annals of Regional Science 41, 813–833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gertler, M.S. (1995): ‘Being there’: proximity, organization, and culture in the development and adoption of advanced manufacturing technologies, Economic Geography 71, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ghoshal, S. and Bartlett, C.A. (1990): The Multinational Corporation as an Interorganizational Network, Academy of Management Review 15, 603–625.Google Scholar
  30. Görg, H. and Strobl, E. (2003): Footloose Multinationals?, The Manchester School 71, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gordon, R. (1995): Globalisation, New Production Systems and the Spatial Division of Labour. In: Littek, W. and Charles, T. (Eds.): The New Division of Labour. Emerging Forms of Work Organisation in International Perspective. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter, 161–207.Google Scholar
  32. Grabher, G. (1993): The weakness of strong ties: the lock-in of regional development in the Ruhr area. In: Grabher, G. (Ed.): The embedded firm. On the socioeconomics of industrial networks. London: Routledge, 255–277.Google Scholar
  33. Granstrand, O. and Sjörlander, S. (1992): Internationalization and diversification of Multi-technology corporations. In: Granstrand, O., Hakanson, L. and Sjölander, S. (Eds.): Technology Management and International Business, Internationalization of R&D and Technology. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 181–207.Google Scholar
  34. Hemer, J., Koschatzky, K., Kroll, H. and Zenker, A. (2007): Framework Conditions for Technological Change and Learning Processes in Firms and Regions. Second draft. Mimeo, contribution to the MATRI Project. Karlsruhe: Fraunhofer ISI.Google Scholar
  35. Hess, M. (2004): “Spatial” relationships? Towards a reconceptualization of embeddedness, Progress in Human Geography 28, 165–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Howells, J. (1990): The globalisation of research and development: A new era of change?, Science and Public Policy 17, 273–285.Google Scholar
  37. Ito, B. and Wakasugi, R. (2007): What factors determine the mode of overseas R&S by multinationals? Empirical evidence, Research Policy 36, 1275–1287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kogut, B. and Zander, U. (1993): Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of the multinational corporation, Journal of International Business Studies 24, 625–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Koschatzky, K. (2001): Räumliche Aspekte im Innovationsprozess. Ein Beitrag zur neuen Wirtschaftsgeographie aus Sicht der regionalen Innovationsforschung. Münster: Lit-Verlag.Google Scholar
  40. Koschatzky, K. and Zenker, A. (1999): The Regional Embeddedness of Small Manufacturing and Service Firms: Regional Networking as Knowledge Source for Innovation? Karlsruhe: Fraunhofer ISI (Working Papers Firms and Region R2/1999).Google Scholar
  41. Kristensen, P.H. and Zeitlin, J. (2004): Local Players in Global Games: The Strategic Constitution of a Multinational Corporation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lambooy, J.G. and Boschma, R.A. (2001): Evolutionary economics and regional policy, The Annals of Regional Science 35, 113–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Markard, J. and Truffer, B. (2008): Technological innovation systems and the multi-level perspective: Towards an integrated framework, Research Policy 37, 596–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Meyer-Krahmer, F. (2003): Lead-Märkte und Innovationsstandorte. In: Warnecke, H.-J. and Bullinger H.-J. (Eds.): Kunststück Innovation. Praxisbeispiele aus der Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft. Heidelberg: Springer, 23–28.Google Scholar
  45. Muller, E. (2001): Innovation Interactions between Knowledge-Intensive Business Services and Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises. An Analysis in Terms of Evolution, Knowledge and Territories. Heidelberg: Physica.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Narula, R. and Santangelo, G.D. (2009): Location, collocation and R&D alliances in the European ICT industry, Research Policy 38, 393–403.Google Scholar
  47. Narula, R. and Zanfei, A. (2005): Globalization of innovation. The role of multinational enterprises. In: Fagerberg, J.; Mowery, D.C. and Nelson, R.R. (eds.): The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, New York: Oxford University Press, 318–345.Google Scholar
  48. Nelson, R.R. and Winter, S.G. (1982): An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Nonaka, I., Toyama, R. and Nagata, A. (2000): A Firm as a Knowledge-creating Entity: A New Perspective on the Theory of the Firm, Industrial and Corporate Change 98, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Ohmae, K. (1995): The end of the nation state: the rise of regional economics. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  51. Polanyi, M. (1997): The Tacit Dimension. In: Prusak, L. (Ed.): Knowledge in Organizations. Resources for the knowledge-based economy. Boston, Oxford, Johannesburg: Butterworth-Heinemann, 135–146.Google Scholar
  52. Porter, M.E. (1990): The competitive advantage of nations. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  53. Reger, G. (1997): Koordination und strategisches Management internationaler Innovationsprozesse. Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Saliola, F. and Zanfei, A. (2009): Multinational firms, global value chains and the organization of knowledge transfer, Research Policy 38, 369–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Scaperlanda, A. (1993): Multinational enterprises and the global market, Journal of Economic Issues 27, 605–616.Google Scholar
  56. Senker, J. (1995): Tacit Knowledge and Models of Innovation, Industrial and Corporate Change 4, 425–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Shimizutani, S. and Todo, Y. (2008): What determines overseas R&D activities? The case of Japanese multinational firms, Research Policy 37, 530–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. von Zedtwitz, M. Gassmann, O. (2002): Market versus Technology Drive in R&D Internationalization: four Different Patterns of Managing Research and Development, Research Policy 31, 569–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Zander, I. (1998): The evolution of technological capabilities in the multinational corporation – dispersion, duplication and potential advantages from multinationality, Research Policy 27, 17–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Zander, I. and Sölvell, Ö. (2000): Cross-Border Innovation in the Multinational Corporation, International Studies of Management & Organization 30, 44–67.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Knut Koschatzky
    • 1
  • Andrea Zenker
    • 1
  • Elisabeth Baier
    • 1
  1. 1.Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation ResearchKarlsruheGermany

Personalised recommendations