Advertisement

How Leading Firms Manage Product Safety in NPD

  • Andy Yunlong Zhu
  • Dimitris G. Assimakopoulos
  • Maximilian von Zedtwitz
Chapter
Part of the Innovation, Technology, and Knowledge Management book series (ITKM)

Abstract

Empirical research has produced little evidence on the implications between NPD practices and product safety. The purpose of this paper is to explore how the leading firms manage product safety in product development in juvenile products industry. To this end, we conducted 30 semi-structured in-depth interviews in 24 leading global firms in the juvenile products industry. This paper reports the results of this exploratory investigation. Thirty-four critical to safety NPD practices are identified. Our results show that the leading firms have a strong commitment to product safety from the top management. They foster a product safety first culture in the firm and devote necessary resources to manage product safety proactively. A strong quality team in charge of product safety is prevalent in these firms. Most importantly, the firms have a formal, well-executed NPD process with cross-functional team in charge of product development from concept to launch. Integrating NPD process with hazard analysis and product safety review by quality/safety engineers is critical to safety and was found pervasive in these firms. Our interviews also uncovered a number of major issues on product safety management in NPD that most firms are facing.

Keywords

Hazard Analysis Chinese Firm Safety Community Design Review Customer Involvement 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Abbott H., and Tyler, M., (1997), Safer by Design: A guide to the management and law of designing for product safety, 2nd edition. Gower Publishing Limited, Aldershot, England.Google Scholar
  2. Barczak, G., Griffin, A., and Kahn, K.B., (2009), Perspective: trends and drivers of success in NPD Practices: results of the 2003 PDMA best practices study. Journal of product innovation management, Vol. 26, pp. 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bapuji, H. and Beamish, P.W., (2008), Product recalls: Avoid hazardous design flaws. Harvard Business Review, Vol. 86, 3, pp. 23–26.Google Scholar
  4. Beamish, P.W. and Bapuji, H., (2008), Toy recalls and China: Emotion vs. Evidence, Management and Organization Review, Vol. 4, 2, pp.197–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blake, R.P., ed., (1943), Industry safety, Prentice-Hall, New York.Google Scholar
  6. Brown, R. L. and Holmes, H. (1986). The use of a factor-analytic procedure for assessing the validity of an employee safety climate model. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 18, 455–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carter, J.R. and Ellram, L.M., (1994), The impact of interorganizational alliances in improving supplier quality, International journal of physical distribution & logistics management, Vol. 24, 5, pp.15–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Christensen, W. C., (2003), Safety through design. Professional safety, Mar 2003, Vol 48, 3, pp. 32–39.Google Scholar
  9. Cooper, R.G., Edgett S.J. and Kleinschmidt E.J., (2004a), Benchmarking Best Practices –I, Research technology management, Vol. 47, 1, pp.31–44.Google Scholar
  10. _______, (2004b), Benchmarking Best Practices –II. Research technology management, Vol. 47, 3, pp. 51–59.Google Scholar
  11. _______, (2004c), Benchmarking Best Practices –IIII. Research technology management, Vol. 47, 6, pp. 43–55.Google Scholar
  12. Cooper, R. G. and Kleinschmidt E.J., (1995), Benchmarking the firm’s critical success factors in new product development, Journal of product innovation management, Vol.12, pp. 374–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. _______, (2007), Winning business in product development: the critical success factors. Research technology management, Vol. 50, 3, pp.52–66.Google Scholar
  14. Cox, S. and Cox, T., (1991), The structure of employee attitudes to safety: an European example. Work and Stress, 12, 189–201.Google Scholar
  15. DeDobbeleer, N. and Beland, F. (1991), A safety climate measure for construction sites. Journal of Safety Research, 22, 97–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Eads, G. and Reuter, P., (1983), Designing safer products: Corporate responses to product liability law and regulation, The rand corporation – The institute for civil justice, Santa Monica.Google Scholar
  17. Goodden, R., (1995), Preventing and handling product liability. Marcel Dekker Publishers, New York.Google Scholar
  18. _______, (Jan 2008), Seminar on Product Safety and Liability Prevention. Shanghai, China.Google Scholar
  19. Gookins, E.F., (2005), Are you ready to defend your product in court?. ASQ world conference on quality and improvement proceedings. Milwaukee, 2005. Vol. 59, pp. 77–80.Google Scholar
  20. Griffin, A., (1997), PDMA research on new product development practices: Updating trends and benchmarking best practices, Journal of product innovation management, Vol. 14, pp. 429–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Griffin, A., and Hauser, J.R., (1993), The voice of customer, Marketing Science, Vol. 12, no. 1, pp 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Handfield R.B. and Lawson B., (Sept-Oct 2007), Integrate suppliers into new product development, Research Technology Management, Vol. 50, 5, pp. 44–51.Google Scholar
  23. Heinrich, H. W., (1931), Industry accident prevention: A scientific approach. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  24. Hodges, C.J., Tyler, M. and Abbott, H., (1996). Product safety, first edition, Sweet and Maxwell, London.Google Scholar
  25. Hofmann, D.A. and Stetzer, A. (1996), A cross-level investigation of factors influencing unsafe behaviors and accidents personnel, Psychology, 49, 307–339.Google Scholar
  26. Kalin, S.R., (1994), Safety starts on the drawing board, Professional Safety, Vol.39, 12, pp. 24–26.Google Scholar
  27. KID (Kids In Danager), (June 15, 2008), 2007: The year of the recall-An examination of juvenile product recalls in 2007 and the implications for child safety, http://www.KidsInDanager.org. Accessed 15 June 2008.
  28. Kitzes, W.F., (1991), Safety management and the Consumer Product Safety Commission, Professional safety, Vol. 36, 4, pp.25–30.Google Scholar
  29. Kolb, J. and Ross, S. S., (1980), Product safety and liability: A desk reference. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  30. Lascelles, D.M. and Dale, B.G., (1989), The buyer-supplier relationship in total quality management, Journal of purchasing and materials management, Vol. 25, 3, pp.10–19.Google Scholar
  31. Main, B.W., (2002), Design reviews: checkpoints for design. Professional Safety; Jan 2002, Vol. 47,1, pp.27–33.Google Scholar
  32. _______, (2004), Risk assessment. Professional Safety; Dec 2004, Vol. 49, 12, pp.37–47.Google Scholar
  33. _______, and Frantz, J.P., (1994), How design engineers address safety: What the safety community should know. Professional Safety; Feb 1994; Vol. 39, 2, pp.22–27.Google Scholar
  34. _______, and McMurphy, K.J., (1998), Safer by design: Reducing hazards through better designs. Professional Safety; Feb98, Vol. 43,2, pp.29–33.Google Scholar
  35. Nelson, S.R., and Eubanks, F., (2005) Risk tools for technical development hazard analysis and FMEA. The PDMA Handbook of New Product Development, pp.430–441, Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  36. Page, A.L., (1993), Assessing new product development practices and performance: Establishing crucial norms, Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 10, 4, pp.273–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Primo M. A.M. and Amundson S.D., (2002), An exploratory study of the effects of supplier relationships on new product development outcomes, Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 20, pp. 33–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ransley, D.L. and Rogers, T.J., (1994), A consensus on best R&D practices. Research technology management, Vol. 37, 2, pp.19–26.Google Scholar
  39. Roland, H. E. and Moriarty, B., (1983), System safety engineering and management. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  40. Roussel, P.A., Saad, K.M. and Erickson, T.J., (1991), Third generation R&D management. Harvard Business School Press, Boston.Google Scholar
  41. Ryan, J.P., (1988), Hazard analysis guidelines in product design, Professional Safety, Vol 33, 3, pp.17–19.Google Scholar
  42. Ryan K.E., (2003), Product liability risk control. Professional Safety, Feb 2003, Vol 48, 2, pp.20–25.Google Scholar
  43. Saraph, J., Benson, P. and Schroeder R., (1989), An instrument for measuring the critical factors of quality management, Decision Sciences, Vol. 20, 4, pp. 810–829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Thia, C.W., Chai, K.H., Bauly, J., and Xin, Y., (2005), An exploratory of the use of quality tools and techniques in product development. The TQM Magazine, Vol. 17, 5, pp. 406–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. von Zedtwitz, M., (2003), Post-project reviews in R&D, Research Technology Management. Sep/Oct 2003; 46, 5; pp. 43–49.Google Scholar
  46. Voss, C., Tsikriktsis, N. and Frohlich, M. (2002), Case research in operations management, International journal of operations & production management, Vol. 22, 2, pp. 195–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. White, T. and Pomponi, R., (2003), Gain a competitive edge by preventing recalls, Quality Progress, Vol. 36, 8, pp. 41–49.Google Scholar
  48. Yin, R. (1994), Case study research, Sage, Beverly Hills.Google Scholar
  49. Zhu, A.Y., von Zedtwitz, M., and Assimakopoulos, D., (2010), How new product development impacts product safety? 2010 Academy of Management Annual Conference Paper, Montreal Canada.Google Scholar
  50. Zirger, B.J. and Maidique, M.A., (1990), A model of new product development: An empirical test. Management Science, Vol. 36, 7, pp. 867–883.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Zohar, D., (1980). Safety Climate in industrial organizations: theoretical and applied implications. Journal of Applied Psychology,65, 95–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Zohar, D., (2000). A group-level model of safety climate: testing the effect of group climate on microaccidents in manufacturing jobs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 587–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andy Yunlong Zhu
    • 1
  • Dimitris G. Assimakopoulos
    • 1
  • Maximilian von Zedtwitz
    • 1
  1. 1.LINC LabGrenoble Ecole de ManagementGrenobleFrance

Personalised recommendations