Skip to main content

Nanoscale Fracture Resistance Measurement of a Composite Bone Cement

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Mechanics of Biological Systems and Materials, Volume 2

Abstract

R-curve characterizes the resistance to fracture of a propagating crack on a brittle material. Ceramic filler material can be added to the PMMA bone cement to improve its resistance to fracture of a propagating crack. The motivation of this study was to improve the fracture resistance of the composite bone cement by incorporating bioactive ceramic nanoparticles with the bone cement. The hypothesis of this study was that extrinsic toughening characteristics of composite cement affect bone-composite fracture toughness. Two specific objectives were achieved during the study: (1) the fracture properties of composite cements were evaluated using in-situ field emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM), (2) R-curve affects on the fracture toughness of composite cements were examined using in-situ FESEM based R-curve measurement techniques. ASTM standard bow tie single edge notch tension specimen was fabricated using commercial PolyMethylMethAcrylate (PMMA) bone cement, bone cement with MgO micro and nanoparticles. The in-situ FESEM SENT fracture tests were conducted on cement specimens at a speed of 1.1 μm/sec. using Evex SEM tensile test stage. This study found that the initiation stress intensity factor of the CBC specimen was higher compared to MgO additives incorporated CBC specimen. Higher energy is required for CBC specimen compared to the composite CBC specimens to propagate crack up to failure. MgO particles contribute to the origin of voids in the cement structure which affect the structural integrity MgO incorporated PMMA bone cement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Moreo, P., Perez M.A., Garcia-Amar J.M., Doblare M., "Modelling the mixed-mode failure of cement-bone interfaces," Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 73(10), 1379–1395 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lucksanasombool, P., Higgs W.A.J., Higgs R., Swain M.V., "Interfacial fracture toughness between bovine cortical bone and cements," Biomaterials, 24(7), 1159–1166 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. An, Y.H., Draughn R.A., Mechanical testing of bone and the bone-implant interface. CRC (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wang, X.D., Agrawal C.M., "A mixed mode fracture toughness test of bone-biomaterial interfaces," Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, 53(6), 664–672 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mann, K.A., Damron L.A., "Predicting the failure response of cement-bone constructs using a non-linear fracture mechanics approach," Journal of Biomechanical Engineering-Transactions of the Asme, 124(4), 462–470 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ichim, I., Li Q., Li W., Swain M.V., Kieser J., "Modelling of fracture behaviour in biomaterials," Biomaterials, 28(7), 1317–1326 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kopperdahl, D.L., Roberts A.D., Keaveny T.M., "Localized damage in vertebral bone is most detrimental in regions of high strain energy density," Journal of Biomechanical Engineering-Transactions of the Asme, 121(6), 622–628 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Shi, Z., Neoh K.G., Kang E.T., Wang W., "Antibacterial and mechanical properties of bone cement impregnated with chitosan nanoparticles," Biomaterials, 27(11), 2440–2449 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Heo, S.J., Park S.A., Shin H.J., Lee Y.J., Yoon T.R., Seo H.Y., Ahn K.C., Kim S.E., Shin J.W., "Evaluation of bonding stress for the newly suggested bone cement: Comparison with currently used pmma through animal studies," Key Engineering Materials, 342342, 373–6 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Liu, H., Webster T.J., "Nanomedicine for implants: A review of studies and necessary experimental tools," Biomaterials, 28(2), 354–369 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ricker, A., Liu-Snyder P., Webster T.J., "The influence of nano mgo and baso4 particle size additives on properties of pmma bone cement," International Journal of Nanomedicine, 3(1), 125–1 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sirinrath, S., Thomas J.W., "Multiwalled carbon nanotubes enhance electrochemical properties of titanium to determine in situ bone formation," Nanotechnology, 19(29), 95101–95101 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lewis, G., "Alternative acrylic bone cement formulations for cemented arthroplasties: Present status, key issues, and future prospects," Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part B Applied Biomaterials, 84(2), 301–319 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Khang, D., Kim S.Y., Liu-Snyder P., Palmore G.T.R., Durbin S.M., Webster T.J., "Enhanced fibronectin adsorption on carbon nanotube/poly(carbonate) urethane: Independent role of surface nano-roughness and associated surface energy," Biomaterials, 28(32), 4756–4768 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sirinrath, S., Chang Y., Xingcheng X., Brian W.S., Thomas J.W., "Greater osteoblast functions on multiwalled carbon nanotubes grown from anodized nanotubular titanium for orthopedic applications," Nanotechnology, 18(36), 65102–65102 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  16. ASTM, "Annual book of astm standards. Section 8," in D790-03 Standard Test Methods for Flexural Properties of Unreinforced and Reinforced Plastics and Electrical Insulating Materials. Philadelphia, PA, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Graham, J., Ries M., Pruitt L., "Effect of bone porosity on the mechanical integrity of the bone-cement interface," Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume, 85A(10), 1901–1908 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Cowin, S.C., Bone mechanics handbook, (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lucksanasombool, P., Higgs W.A.J., Higgs R., Swain M.V., "Fracture toughness of bovine bone: Influence of orientation and storage media," Biomaterials, 22(23), 3127–3132 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zou, L., Huang Y., Wang C.-a., "The characterization and measurement of interfacial toughness for si3n4/bn composites by the four-point bend test," Journal of the European Ceramic Society, 24(9), 2861–2868 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this paper

Cite this paper

Khandaker, M., Tarantini, S. (2011). Nanoscale Fracture Resistance Measurement of a Composite Bone Cement. In: Proulx, T. (eds) Mechanics of Biological Systems and Materials, Volume 2. Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0219-0_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0219-0_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-0218-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-0219-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics