Skip to main content

The Archaeology of Capitalism in Colonial Contexts, an Introduction: Provincializing Historical Archaeology

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Contributions To Global Historical Archaeology ((CGHA))

Abstract

In introducing Capitalism in Colonial Contexts, we raise the question whether there is currently an epistemological crisis in historical archaeology, as those writing from the “margins” of the field increasingly critique taken-for-granted arguments about the development of capitalism and the way in which colonized and indigenous populations are largely viewed as peripheral to this process. We draw upon postcolonial theory, particularly Subaltern Studies histories, to suggest new engagements with capitalism and colonialism in historical archaeology, which are able to recognize the importance of these two “universals” of our discipline, and yet are able to do so without privileging Eurocentric narratives. Case-study chapters in the volume are also introduced and discussed in relation to our overall theoretical arguments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    We recognize the contentions over the scope and use of this term (see particularly Moreland 2001; Reid and Lane 2004; Schmidt and Walz 2007), however we apply it in the general sense meant by those who are members of the Society for Historical Archaeology, the annual meeting of which the papers in this volume were first aired. The concise definition on their website states: “Historical archaeology is the study of the material remains of past societies that also left behind some other form of historical evidence. … These sites [in the New World] document early European settlement and its effects on Native American peoples, as well as the subsequent spread of the frontier and later urbanization and industrialization. By examining the physical and documentary record of these sites, historical archaeologists attempt to discover the fabric of common everyday life in the past and seek to understand the broader historical development of their own and other societies.” (Society for Historical Archaeology 2007) This definition is problematic in terms of a global discourse within the discipline, but we shall leave it to other authors to contribute new defining terms.

  2. 2.

    In these comparisons, archaeologists are, in fact, trying to mark off their territory as the only ­discipline in which truly long-term comparison can take place, since archaeology “is the only discipline that can cover the full temporal range of colonial forms over the millennia.” (Gosden 2004: 6)

  3. 3.

    Stein (2005b: 4) notes, drawing on a seminar and edited volume of work by archaeologists attempting cross-cultural comparisons in the archaeology of colonialism that there is a lack of consensus by anthropologists as to: “(1) what colonies are, (2) how and why colonies vary from one another, (3) how colonies function as social, economic, and political entities, (4) what colonial relations are like with indigenous host communities, and (5) how ethnic identities are transformed in colonial situations.” Within this discourse, even the terminology of colonies, colonization, and colonialism are contested ground. Within history, there has been a challenge for rigor in the use of the term colonial as a phenomenon outside of what might more narrowly be termed empires or true imperial formations, the use of which may result in “a diminished ability to make distinctions among the various forms of discrimination and exclusion [existing outside of colonialism] and a tendency to look away from the actual histories of colonization toward a homogenized coloniality.” (Cooper 2005: 26; cf. Palus, this volume). Even within a more narrowly defined sense of colonialism, the changes and temporalities of colonialism can be hard to capture: “Although distinguishing empires with chronological labels – “modern,” “premodern,” or “ancient” – is tautological and unrevealing, empires did change over time and in space. Empires’ capacities and strategies altered as competition drove innovations in ideas and technology and as conflicts challenged or enhanced imperial might.” (Burbank and Cooper 2010: 17, cf. Gosden 2004 on the periodization of colonial formations)

  4. 4.

    A lack of dialogue on the nature of colonialism within the field may also relate to postcolonial amnesia in some quarters (Gandhi 1998: 4) as well as the usual north-Atlantic-centric assumptions on the part of historical archaeology more generally.

  5. 5.

    For a narrative of colonialism ordered chronologically which distinctly unseats this epoch of specifically Western and European colonialism as the only form of the last 500 years see Burbank and Cooper (2010: Chaps.  6–11).

  6. 6.

    This definition can be compared to that of a recent comparative volume written by historians: “Empires are large political units, expansionist or with a memory of power extended over space, polities that maintain distinction and hierarchy as they incorporate new people . . . empire reaches outward and draws, usually coercively, peoples whose difference is made explicit under its rule. The concept of empires presumes that different peoples within the polity will be governed differently.” (Burbank and Cooper 2010: 8) This definition shares with Gosden attention to the power of the colonial or imperial formation. But Gosden is not concerned, in his general definition, to pay attention to differences between empire and state power; he is concerned only with the operation of power within expansive political formations. Burbank and Cooper, by contrast, are writing from the perspective of modern historians, where a distinction between nation-states (which may also be expansive) and empires is required; in this they find that the marking of difference in colonial subjects (whether or not this has material registers, for this is not their concern) rather than the shared citizenship of nation-states, is the fundamental premise of colonial power.

  7. 7.

    A flip side to this is the assumption of the place of the West as viewed from the side of the Rest, often allowing for discourses about the place of the Occident to go unchallenged (Carrier 1992).

  8. 8.

    It should be noted that postcolonial theory and Marxism have a complex relationship; postcolonial scholars are indebted to a theoretical genealogy of Marxist scholarship, particularly coming through Foucault to Said, but they simultaneously are able to take apart the Marxist historical framework of the idea of the West and its Others (Gandhi 1998: 25; Patterson 2008: 30).

  9. 9.

    This idea of taking short-term events as a perspective within archaeology to write longer-term histories (sensu Ginzburg 1990 [1982]) has also been explored from the perspective of microhistory, see Brooks et al. (Eds., 2008) for a range of studies on this approach.

  10. 10.

    The issue of scholarly positionality is a key one in postcolonial theory, as articulated in the seminal piece ‘Can the Subaltern Speak?’ (Spivak 1988). See also Fontein (2010: 315) and Battle-Baptiste (2010: 390) for specific discussion of the place of position (both emic and etic) and representation in postcolonial archaeological scholarship.

  11. 11.

    One of the strongest analogies to the system in place in Russian Alaska may be found in Spanish colonialism in the Americas. See in particular Voss (2008) for a full length study of attempts to regulate ethnicity versus on-the-ground ethnogenesis. See also Deagan (1973, 1998) and Loren (2005) for further discussions of ethnicity and colonialism in Spanish America. For a more general discussion on issues of sexuality and identity within colonial relations, see McClintock (1995) and Cooper and Stoler (1997).

  12. 12.

    The plantation landscape of Zanzibar was also very different to that of the spatially ordered modern landscapes of Jamaican plantations as discussed by Higman (1987) and Delle (1998), thus adding to the complexity of our understandings of what plantations are. See Croucher (2007, in prep) for detail on plantation landscapes and their relationship to capitalist production on Zanzibar.

  13. 13.

    The historical roots of speculative capitalism and their legacy of global inequalities while presenting the specter of possible riches are also addressed in Tsing (2005), Friction, through the Bre-X scandal in Indonesia.

  14. 14.

    One thing that should also be noted is the potential for the renarration of heritage within the terms of neoliberal capitalism as heritage increasingly becomes a potential commodity (Hall and Bombardella 2005; Horning, this volume).

References

  • Appadurai, Arjun. 1996 Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asad, Talal (editor). 1973 Anthropology and the Colonial Encounter. Humanities Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baram, Uzi, and Lynda Carroll (editors). 2000 A Historical Archaeology of the Ottoman Empire: Breaking New Ground. Springer, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Battle-Baptiste, Whitney. 2010 An Archaeologist Finds Her Voice: A Commentary on Colonial and Postcolonial Identities. In Handbook of Postcolonial Archaeology, edited by J. Lydon and U.Z. Rizvi, pp. 387–391. World Archaeological Congress Research Handbooks in Archaeology, Vol. 3. Left Coast Press, Walnut Creek, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaudry, Mary C. (editor). 1988 Documentary Archaeology in the New World. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaudry, Mary C., Lauren J. Cook, and Stephen A. Mrozowski. 1991 Artifacts and Active Voices: Material Culture as Social Discourse. In The Archaeology of Inequality, edited by R.H. McGuire and R. Paynter, pp. 150–191. Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Behar, Ruth 1995 Introduction: Out of Exile. In Women Writing Culture. R. Behar and D.A. Gordon, eds. pp. 1–29. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belford, Paul, and R.A. Ross. 2004 Industry and Domesticity: Exploring Historical Archaeology in Ironbridge Gorge. Post-Medieval Archaeology 38(2): 59–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhabha, Homi K. 1994 The Location of Culture. Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bissell, William Cunningham. 2011 Urban Design, Chaos, and Colonial Power in Zanzibar. Indiana University Press, Bloomington and Indianapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, James F., Christopher R. N. DeCorse, and John Walton (editors). 2008 Small Worlds: Method, Meaning, and Narrative in Microhistory. School for Advanced Research Press, Santa Fe, NM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burbank, Jane and Frederick Cooper. 2010 Empires in World History: Power and the Politics of Difference. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrier, James G. 1992 Occidentalism: The world turned upside down. American Ethnologist 19(2): 195–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casella, Eleanor Conlin, and Sarah K. Croucher. 2010 The Alderley Sandhills Project: An Archaeology of Community Life in (Post)-Industrial England. Manchester University Press, Manchester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casella, Eleanor Conlin, and James Symonds (editors). 2005 Industrial Archaeology: Future Directions. Springer, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakrabarty, Dipesh. 2002 Habitations of Modernity: Essays in the Wake of Subaltern Studies. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakrabarty, Dipesh. 2008 [2000] Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, Charles R. 2005 Archaeology and the “Savage Slot”: Displacement and Emplacement in the Premodern World. American Anthropologist 107(4): 563–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, Charles R., and Diana DiPaolo Loren. 2008 The Earth of the Modern. Archaeologies 4(1): 11–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comaroff, John. 2010 The End of Anthropology, Again: On the Future of an In/Discipline. American Anthropologist 112(4): 524–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comaroff, Jean, and John L. Comaroff. 1991 Of Revelation and Revolution, Volume One: Christianity, Colonialism and consciousness in South Africa. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comaroff, John, and Karl-Heinz Kohl. 2010 Introduction to “In Focus: (Not) The End of Anthropology, Again? Some Thoughts on Disciplinary Futures”. American Anthropologist 112(4): 522–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, Frederick. 2005 Colonialism in Question: Theory, Knowledge, History. University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, Frederick, and Ann Laura Stoler (editors). 1997 Tensions of Empire: Colonial Cultures in a Bourgeois World. University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Croucher, Sarah K. 2007 Facing Many Ways: Approaches to the Archaeological Landscapes of the East African Coast. In Envisioning Landscape: Situations and Standpoints in Archaeology and Heritage. edited by D. Hicks, L. McAtackney, and G. Fairclough, pp. 55–74. One World Archaeology Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Croucher, Sarah K. in prep Capitalism and Cloves: A Critique of Historical Archaeology. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawdy, Shannon Lee. 2010 Clockpunk Anthropology and the Ruins of Modernity. Current Anthropology 51(6): 761–793.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawdy, Shannon Lee. 2008 Building the Devil’s Empire: French Colonial New Orleans. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deagan, Kathleen. 1973 Mestizaje in Colonial St. Augustine. Ethnohistory 20(1):55–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deagan, Kathleen. 1998 Transculturation and Spanish American Ethnogenesis: The Archaeological Legacy of the Quincentary. In Studies in Culture Contact: Interaction, Culture Change and Archaeology, edited by J.G. Cusick, pp. 23–43. Visiting Scholar Conference Volumes. Southern Illinois University, Center for Archaeological Investigations (Occasional Paper No. 25), Carbondale.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deagan, Kathleen. 2001 Dynamics of imperial adjustment in Spanish America: ideology and social integration. In Empires: Perspectives from Archaeology and History, edited by S.E. Alcock, T.N. D’Altroy, K.D. Morrison, and C.M. Sinopoli, pp. 179–194. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deetz, James. 1993 Flowerdew Hundred: The Archaeology of a Virginia Plantation. University of Virginia Press, Charlottesville, VA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deetz, James. 1996 In Small Things Forgotten: An Archaeology of Early American Life. Anchor Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delle, James A. 1998 An Archaeology of Social Space: Analyzing Coffee Plantations in Jamaica’s Blue Mountains. Pleunum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delle, James A., Stephen A. Mrozowski, and Robert Paynter (editors). 2000 Lines That Divide: Historical Archaeologies of Race, Class, and Gender. The University of Tennessee Press, Knoxville, TN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietler, Michael. 2005 The Archaeology of Colonization and the Colonization of Archaeology: Theoretical Challenges from an Ancient Mediterranean Colonial Encounter. In The Archaeology of Colonial Encounters: Comparative Perspectives, edited by G.J. Stein, pp. 33–68. School of American Research Press, Santa Fe, NM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabian, Johannes. 2002 [1983] Time and the Other: How Anthropology Makes its Object. Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fennell, Christopher C. 2007 Crossroads and Cosmologies: Diasporas and Ethnogenesis in the New World. University Press of Florida, Gainesville.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, Leland. 1992 Uncommon Ground: Archaeology and Early African America, 1650–1800. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fontein, Joost. 2010 The Efficacy of “Emic” and “Etic” in Archaeology and Heritage. In Handbook of Postcolonial Archaeology, edited by J. Lydon and U.Z. Rizvi, pp. 311–322. World Archaeological Congress Research Handbooks in Archaeology, Vol. 3. Left Coast Press, Walnut Creek, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Funari, Pedro Paolo, Martin Hall, and Siân Jones (editors). 1999 Historical Archaeology: Back From the Edge. Routledge, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gandhi, Leela. 1998 Postcolonial Theory: A Critical Introduction. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginzburg, Carlo. 1990 [1980] The Cheese and the Worms: Cosmos of a Sixteenth-Century Miller. J. Tedeschi and A. Tedeschi, transl. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.

    Google Scholar 

  • González-Ruibal, Alfredo. 2008 Time to Destroy: An Archaeology of Supermodernity. Current Anthropology 49(2): 247–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gosden, Chris. 2004 Archaeology and Colonialism: Cultural Contact from 5000 BC to the Present. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, Martin. 2000 Archaeology and the Modern World: Colonial Transcripts in South Africa and the Chesapeake. Routledge, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, Martin, and Pia Bombardella. 2005 Las Vegas in Africa. Journal of Social Archaeology 5(1): 5–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, David. 2010 A Companion to Marx’s Capital. Verso, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauser, Mark W. 2008 An Archaeology of Black Markets: Local Ceramics and Economies in Eighteenth-Century Jamaica. University Press of Florida, Gainesville.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higman, B.W. 1987 The Spatial Economy of Jamaican Sugar Plantations: Cartographic Evidence from the Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries. Journal of Historical Geography 13(1): 17–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higman, B.W. 2000 The Sugar Revolution. The Economic History Review 53(2): 213–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howson, J.E. 1990 Social Relations and Material Culture: A Critique of the Archaeology of Plantation Slavery. Historical Archaeology 24(4): 78–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Matthew. 1996 An Archaeology of Capitalism. Blackwell, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kearns, Gary. 1998 The Virtuous Circle of Facts and Values in the New Western History. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 88(3): 377–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelso, William M. 1997 Archaeology at Monticello: Artifacts of Everyday Life in the Plantation Community. Thomas Jefferson Foundation, Charlottesville, VA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, Susan (editor). 2003 Archaeologies of the British: Explorations of Identity in Great Britain and its Colonies, 1600–1945. Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leone, Mark. 2005 The Archaeology of Liberty in an American Capital: Excavations in Annapolis. University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leone, Mark. 1999a Setting Some terms for Historical Archaeologies of Capitalism. In Historical Archaeologies of Capitalism, edited by M.P. Leone and P.B.J. Potter, pp. 3–20. Contributions to Global Historical Archaeology. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leone, Mark. 1999b Ceramics from Annapolis, Maryland: A Measure of Time Routines and Work Discipline. In Historical Archaeologies of Capitalism, edited by M.P. Leone and P.B.J. Potter, pp. 195–216. Kluwer Academic/Plenum, New York.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Leone, Mark, Parker B. Jr. Potter, and Paul A. Shackel. 2000 [1987] Toward a Critical Archaeology. In Interpretive Archaeology: A Reader, edited by J. Thomas, pp. 458–473. Leicester University Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liebmann, Matthew. 2008 Introduction: The Intersections of Archaeology and Postcolonial Studies. In Archaeology and the Postcolonial Critique, edited by U.Z. Rizvi and M. Liebmann, pp. 1 – 20. AltaMira Press, Lanham, MD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liebmann, Matthew, and Melissa S. Murphy. 2011 Rethinking the Archaeology of “Rebels, Backsliders, and Idolaters. In Enduring Conquests: Rethinking the Archaeology of Resistance to Spanish Colonialism in the Americas, edited by M. Liebmann and M.S. Murphy, pp. 3–18. School for Advanced Research, Advanced Seminar Series. School for Advanced Research Press, Santa Fe, NM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liebmann, Matthew, and Uzma Z. Rizvi (editors). 2008 Archaeology and the Postcolonial Critique. AltaMira Press, Lanham, MD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lightfoot, Kent G., Antionette Martinez, and Ann M. Schiff. 1998 Daily Practice and Material Culture in Pluralistic Social Settings: An Archaeological Study of Culture Change and Persistence from Fort Ross, California. American Antiquity 63(2): 199–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Little, Barbara J. 1994. People with History: An Update on Historical Archaeology in the United States. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 1 (1): 5–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loren, Diana DiPaolo. 2005 Creolization in the French and Spanish Colonies. In North American Archaeology, edited by T.R. Pauketat and D.D. Loren, pp. 297–318. Blackwell Studies in Global Archaeology. Blackwell, Malden, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, Gavin. 2004 Modern Disturbances: On the Ambiguities of Archaeology. Modernism/modernity 11(1): 109–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lydon, Jane, and Uzma Z. Rizvi (editors). 2010 Handbook of Postcolonial Archaeology. Left Coast Press, Walnut Creek, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, Karl. 1976 [1867] Capital: A Critique of Political Economy, Volume One. B. Fowkes, transl. Penguin Books, London and New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClintock, Anne. 1995 Imperial Leather: Race, Gender and Sexuality in Colonial Contest. Routledge, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDavid, Carol. 2002 Archaeologies that Hurt; Descendants that Matter: A Pragmatic Approach to Collaboration in the Public Interpretation of African-American Archaeology. World Archaeology 34(2): 303–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, Randall H. 2008 Archaeology of Political Action. University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meskell, Lynn. 2005 Introduction: Object Orientations. In Archaeologies of Materiality, edited by L. Meskell, pp. 1–17. Malden, MA/Oxford: Blackwell.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Meskell, Lynn. 2009 Introduction: Cosmopolitan Heritage Ethics. In Cosmopolitan Archaeologies, edited by L. Meskell, pp. 1–17. Duke University Press, Duke, NC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintz, Sidney W. 1985 Sweetness and Power: The Place of Sugar in Modern History. Penguin Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreland, John. 2001 Archaeology and Text. Duckworth, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mrozowski, Stephen A. 2006 The Archaeology of Class in Urban America. Cambridge University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mrozowski, Stephen A., James A. Delle, and Robert Paynter. 2000 Introduction. In Lines That Divide: Historical Archaeologies of Race, Class, and Gender, edited by J.A. Delle, S.A. Mrozowski, and R. Paynter, pp. xi-xxxi. The University of Tennessee Press, Knoxville, TN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullins, Paul R. 1999a “A Bold and Gorgeous Front”: The Contradictions of African America and Consumer Culture. In Historical Archaeologies of Capitalism, edited by M. Leone and P.B.J. Potter, pp. 169–195. Contributions to Global Historical Archaeology. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mullins, Paul R. 1999b Race and Affluence: An Archaeology of African America and Consumer Culture. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orser, Charles E. Jr. 1991 The Continued Pattern of Dominance: Landlord and Tenant on the postbellum Cotton Plantation. In Archaeology of Inequality, edited by R.H. McGuire and R. Paynter, pp. 40–54. Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orser, Charles E. Jr. 1996 A Historical Archaeology of the Modern World. Plenum, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orser, Charles E. Jr. 1999 Archaeology and the Challenges of Capitalist Farm Tenancy in America. In Historical Archaeologies of Capitalism, edited by M. Leone and P.B.J. Potter, pp. 143–168. Contributions to Global Historical Archaeology. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ortner, Sherry B. 1984 Theory in Anthropology since the Sixties. Comparative Studies in Society and History 26(1): 126–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, Marilyn, and Peter Neaverson. 2005 The Textile Industry of South West England: A Social Archaeology. Tempus, Stroud, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pandey, Gyanendra. 2000 Voices from the Edge: The Struggle to Write Subaltern Histories. In Mapping Subaltern Studies and the Postcolonial, edited by V. Chaturvedi, Mapping, published in association with New Left Review. Verso, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, Thomas C. 2008 A Brief History of Postcolonial Theory and Implications for Archaeology. In Archaeology and the Postcolonial Critique, edited by M. Liebmann and U.Z. Rizvi, pp. 21–34. Archaeology in Society Series. AltaMira Press, Lanham, MD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prakash, Gyan. 2000 Can the ‘Subaltern’ Ride? A Reply to O’Hanlon and Washbrook. In Mapping Subaltern Studies and the Postcolonial, edited by V. Chaturvedi, pp. 220–238. Mapping, published in association with New Left Review. Verso, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Purser, Margaret. 1999 Ex Occidente Lux? An Archaeology of Later Capitalism in the Nineteenth-Century West. In Historical Archaeologies of Capitalism, edited by M. Leone and P.B.J. Potter, pp. 115–141. Contributions to Global Historical Archaeology. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Reid, Andrew, and Paul J. Lane. 2004 African Historical Archaeologies: An Introductory Consideration of Scope and Potential. In African Historical Archaeologies, edited by. A.M. Reid and P.J. Lane, pp. 1–32. Contributions to Global Historical Archaeology. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubertone, Patricia E. 2000 The Historical Archaeology of Native Americans. Annual Review of Anthropology 29: 425–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Said, Edward W. 1995 [1978] Orientalism: Western Conceptions of the Orient. Penguin Books, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, Peter R. 1990 Oral Traditions, Archaeology and History: A Short Reflective History. In A History of African Archaeology, edited by P. Robertshaw, pp. 252–270. London/Portsmouth (N.H.): James Currey/Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, Peter R. 2006 Historical Archaeology in Africa: Representation, Social Memory, and Oral Traditions. AltaMira, Lanham and New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, Peter R., and Jonathan R. Walz. 2007 Re-Representing African Pasts through Historical Archaeology. American Antiquity 72(1): 53–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd, Nick. 2008 WAC at a Crossroads. Archaeologies 4(1): 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd, Nick. 2002 The Politics of Archaeology in Africa. Annual Review of Anthropology 31:189–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silliman, Stephen W. 2005 Culture Contact or Colonialism? Challenges in the Archaeology of Native North America. American Antiquity 70(1): 55–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silliman, Stephen W. 2001 Agency, Practical Politics and the Archaeology of Culture Contact. Journal of Social Archaeology 1(2): 190–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silliman, Stephen W. 2009 Change and Continuity, Practice and Memory: Native American Persistence in Colonial New England. American Antiquity 74(2): 211–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sivaramakrishnan, K. 2005 Some Intellectual Genealogies for the Concept of Everyday Resistance. American Anthropologist 107(3): 346–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Society for Historical Archaeology. 2007. What is Historical Archaeology? Electronic document, http://www.sha.org/about/whatis.cfm, accessed October 18 2010.

  • South, Stanley. 1978 Pattern Recognition in Historical Archaeology. American Antiquity 43(2): 223–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. 1988 “Can the Subaltern Speak?” In Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture, edited by C. Nelson and L. Grossberg, pp. 271–313. University of Illinois Press, Urbana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. 2000 Thinking Cultural Questions in ‘Pure’ Literary Terms. In Without Guarantees: In Honour of Stuart Hall, edited by P. Gilroy, L. Grossberg, and A. McRobbie, pp. 335–357. Verso, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. 2006 [1987] In Other Worlds: Essays in Cultural Politics. Routledge, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, Ann Brower. 2007 Entangled Lives: The Archaeology of Daily Life in the gold Coast Hinterlands, AD 1400–1900. In Archaeology of Atlantic Africa and the African Diaspora, edited by A. Ogundiran and T. Faloda, pp. 49–76. Indiana University Press, Bloomington and Indiana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, Gil J. (editor). 2005a The Archaeology of Colonial Encounters: Comparative Perspectives. Santa Fe: School of American Research Press, Santa Fe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, Gil J. 2005b Introduction: The Comparative Archaeology of Colonial Encounters. In The Archaeology of Colonial Encounters: Comparative Perspectives, edited by G.J. Stein, pp. 3–32. School of American Research press, Santa Fe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarlow, Sarah 2007 The Archaeology of Improvement in Britain, 1750–1850. Cambridge University Press, New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, Julian. 2004 Archaeology and Modernity. Routledge, London & New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trouillot, Michel-Rolph. 1991 Anthropology and the Savage Slot: The Poetics and Politcs of Otherness. In Recapturing Anthropology: Working in the Present, edited by R.G. Fox, pp. 16–44. School of American Research Advanced Seminar Series. School of American Research Press, Santa Fe, New Mexico.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trouillot, Michel-Rolph. 1995 Silencing the Past: Power and the Production of History. Bacon Press, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trouillot, Michel-Rolph. 2003 Global Transformations: Anthropology and the Modern World. Palgrave Macmillan, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsing, Anna Lownhaupt. 2005 Friction: An Ethnography of Global Connection. Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Dommelen, Peter. 2005 Colonial Interactions and Hybrid Practices: Phoenician and Carthaginian Settlement in the Ancient Mediterranean. In The Archaeology of Colonial Encounters: Comparative Perspectives, edited by G.J. Stein, pp. 109–142. Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voss, Barbara L. 2008 The Archaeology of Ethnogenesis: Race and Sexuality in Colonial San Francisco. University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wall, Diana di Zerega. 1999 Examining Gender, Class and Ethnicity in Nineteenth-Century New York. Historical Archaeology 33(1): 102–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallerstein, Immanuel. 1976 The Modern World-System: Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World-Economy in the Sixteenth Century. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallerstein, Immanuel. 2000 The Essential Wallerstein. The New Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, Lindsay 2007 Heritage-Making and Political Identity. Journal of Social Archaeology 7(3): 413–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkie, Laurie A., and Paul Farnsworth. 2005 Sampling Many Pots: An Archaeology of Memory and Tradition at a Bahamian Plantation. University Press of Florida, Gainesville.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Eric. 1994 [1944] Capitalism and Slavery. University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, Eric R. 1997 [1982] Europe and the People Without History. Second Edition. University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, Margaret C. 2002 Moving Towards Transformative Democratic Action through Archaeology. Historical Archaeology 6(3): 187–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wurst, LouAnn. 1999 Internalizing Class in Historical Archaeology. Historical Archaeology 33(1): 7–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wylie, Alison. 1999 Why Should Historical Archaeologists Study Capitalism? The Logic of Question and Answer and the Challenge of Systemic Analysis. In Historical Archaeologies of Capitalism, edited by M. Leone and P.B.J. Potter, pp. 23–50. Contributions to Global Historical Archaeology. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Young, Robert C. 1995 Colonial Desire: Hybridity in Theory, Culture and Race. Routledge, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sarah K. Croucher .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Croucher, S.K., Weiss, L. (2011). The Archaeology of Capitalism in Colonial Contexts, an Introduction: Provincializing Historical Archaeology. In: Croucher, S., Weiss, L. (eds) The Archaeology of Capitalism in Colonial Contexts. Contributions To Global Historical Archaeology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0192-6_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics