Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Master Techniques in Blepharoplasty and Periorbital Rejuvenation pp 31–43Cite as

Critical Evaluation of the Periorbital Aesthetic Patient

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

The periorbital aesthetic evaluation requires a structured approach. The assessment may be subdivided to the following units: (1) orbitoskeleton and globe, (2) the forehead and upper eyelid complex, and (3) the lower eyelid and midface complex. It is imperative to recognize the interrelationships and continuity of these structures. Underlying anatomy should be correlated to physical findings. Eyelid and facial dynamic function are important in the assessment. The exam should also include palpation and digital repositioning. Patient involvement and dialogue is vital and a mirror is a helpful tool. With an organized evaluation, a customized approach can be offered and optimal functional and aesthetic surgical results can be achieved.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. McCurdy Jr JA. Beautiful eyes: characteristics and application to aesthetic surgery. Facial Plast Surg. 2006;22(3):204–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Springer IN, Wannicke B, Warnke PH, Zernial O, Wiltfang J, Russo PA, et al. Facial attractiveness: visual impact of symmetry increases significantly towards the midline. Ann Plast Surg. 2007;59(2):156–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rhodes G, Proffitt F, Grady JM, Sumich A. Facial symmetry and the perception of beauty. Psychon Bull Ver. 1998;5(4):659–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ho T, Brissett AE. Preoperative assessment of the aging patient. Facial Plast Surg. 2006;22(2):85–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. McCord CD, Codner MA. Aging changes in the eyelid and periorbital area. In: Eyelid and periorbital surgery. St. Louis, MO: Quality Medical; 2008. p. 133–50.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hester Jr TR, Douglas T, Szczerba S. Decreasing complications in lower lid and midface rejuvenation: the importance of orbital morphology, horizontal lower lid laxity, history of previous surgery, and minimizing trauma to the orbital septum: a critical review of 269 consecutive cases. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;123(3):1037–49.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hirmand H, Codner MA, McCord CD, Hester Jr TR, Nahai F. Prominent eye: operative management in lower lid and midfacial rejuvenation and the morphologic classification system. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;110(2):620–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ahmadi H, Shams PN, Davies NP, Joshi N, Kelly MH. Age-related changes in the normal sagittal relationship between globe and orbit. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2007;60(3):246–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gunter JP, Antrobus SD. Aesthetic analysis of the eyebrows. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997;99(7):1808–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Alex JC. Aesthetic considerations in the elevation of the eyebrow. Facial Plast Surg. 2004;20(3):193–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. McCord CD, Doxanas MT. Browplasty and browpexy: an adjunct to blepharoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1990;86(2):248–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Pitanguy I, Radwanski HN. Rejuvenation of the brow. Dermatol Clin. 1997;15(4):623–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Morton AD. Assessment and management of the eyebrow. In: Albert DM, Jakobiec FA, editors. Principles and practice of ophthalmology. Basic sciences. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2008. p. 3529–42.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Starck WJ, Griffin Jr JE, Epker BN. Objective evaluation of the eyelids and eyebrows after blepharoplasty. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1996;54(3):297–302.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ross AT, Neal JG. Rejuvenation of the aging eyelid. Facial Plast Surg. 2006;22(2):97–104.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Goldstein SA, Goldstein SM. Anatomic and aesthetic considerations in midfacial rejuvenation. Facial Plast Surg. 2006;22(2):105–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Perkins SW, Batniji RK. Rejuvenation of the lower eyelid complex. Facial Plast Surg. 2005;21(4):279–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Logau RG. Systematic evaluation of the aging face. In: Bolognia JL, Jorizzo JL, Rapini RP, editors. Dermatology. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2008. p. 2295–9.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Goldberg RA, McCann JD, Fiaschetti D, Ben Simon GJ. What causes eyelid bags? Analysis of 114 consecutive patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;115(5):1395–402.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Byrd HS, Burt JD. Achieving aesthetic balance in the brow, eyelids, and midface. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;110(3):926–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hester Jr TR, Codner MA, McCord CD, Nahai F, Giannopoulos A. Evolution of technique of the direct transblepharoplasty approach for the correction of lower lid and midfacial aging: maximizing results and minimizing complications in a 5-year experience. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;105(1):393–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Goldberg RA. The three periorbital hollows: a paradigm for periorbital rejuvenation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;116(6):1796–804.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Holck DEE, Foster JA, Kalwerisky K. Lower eyelid blepharoplasty and midface elevation surgery. In: Albert DM, Jakobiec FA, editors. Principles and practice of ophthalmology. Basic sciences. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2008. p. 3471–82.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Patipa M. Combined hard palate spacer graft, midface suspension, and lateral canthoplasty for lower eyelid retraction: a tripartite approach. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;115(7):2115–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Hamra ST. The role of the septal reset in creating a youthful eyelid-cheek complex in facial rejuvenation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;113(7):2124–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Muzaffar AR, Mendelson BC, Adams Jr WP. Surgical anatomy of the ligamentous attachments of the lower lid and lateral canthus. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;110(3):873–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kikkawa DO, Bradley NL, Dortzback K. Relations of the superficial musculoaponeurotic system to the orbit and characterization of the orbitomalar ligament. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 1996;12(2):77–88.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Atiyeh BS, Hayek SN. Combined arcus marginalis release, preseptal orbicularis muscle sling, and SOOF plication for midfacial rejuvenation. Aesthet Plast Surg. 2004;28(4):197–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. De Cordier BC, de la Torre JI, Al-Hakeem MS, Rosenberg LZ, Costa-Ferreira A, Gardner PM, et al. Rejuvenation of the midface by elevating the malar fat pad: review of technique, cases, and complications. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;110(6):1526–36.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kawamoto HK, Bradley JP. The tear “TROUF” procedure: transconjunctival repositioning of orbital unipedicled fat. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;112(7):1903–7; discussion 1908–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Oculoplastic Surgery, Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA

    Jeremiah P. Tao (Assitant Professor, Director), Betina Wachter MD (Clinical Instructor) & Steven Yoon MD (Clinical Instructor)

Authors
  1. Jeremiah P. Tao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Betina Wachter MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Steven Yoon MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeremiah P. Tao .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Spaulding Drive, Cosmetic Surgery and Dermatology, Director, Ophthalmic Plastic Surgery, Beverly Hills, 90212, California, USA

    Guy G. Massry MD

  2. Palm Beach Facial Plastic Surgery, Director, Palm Beach Gardens, 33410, Florida, USA

    Mark R. Murphy MD

  3. Department of Facial Plastic, and Reconstructive Surgery, Assistant Clinical Professor of Surgery, Beverly Hills, 90211, California, USA

    Babak Azizzadeh MD

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tao, J.P., Wachter, B., Yoon, S. (2011). Critical Evaluation of the Periorbital Aesthetic Patient. In: Massry, G., Murphy, M., Azizzadeh, B. (eds) Master Techniques in Blepharoplasty and Periorbital Rejuvenation. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0067-7_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0067-7_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-0066-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-0067-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation