Advertisement

Wireless Displays in Educational Augmented Reality Applications

  • Hannes Kaufmann
  • Mathis Csisinko
Chapter

Abstract

Augmented Reality (AR) as defined by Azuma [1] does not pose restrictions on output devices to be used for AR. Starting with light-weight notebooks and ultra mobile PCs, recently smartphones became favorite AR output devices. They represent a class of self contained computing units, providing (usually limited) computing power as well as input and output peripherals – all in one device.

Keywords

Augmented Reality Video Signal Output Device Head Mount Display Augmented Reality Application 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was funded in part by the Austrian Science Fund FWF project P19265, the EU FP7 projects PLAYMANCER (FP7-ICT-215839) and VISION (FP7-211567).

References

  1. 1.
    R. Azuma, “A Survey of Augmented Reality,” Presence - Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, vol. 6, pp. 355–385, 1997.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    H. Kaufmann and M. Csisinko, “Multiple Head Mounted Displays in Virtual and Augmented Reality Applications,” International Journal of Virtual Reality, vol. 6, pp. 43–50, 2007.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Y. Boger. (2010, accessed Jan 2011). Cutting the Cord: the 2010 Survey on using Wireless Video with Head-Mounted Displays.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    M. Feder. (2007, accessed Jan 2011). Enabling wireless uncompressed HDTV connectivity with a unique video-modem approach: A technical overview. http://www.amimon.com/PDF/tech_article%20final.pdf.
  5. 5.
    H. Kaufmann and A. Dünser, “Summary of Usability Evaluations of an Educational Augmented Reality Application,” in HCI International Conference (HCII 2007). vol. 14, LNCS 4563, R. Shumaker, Ed., Beijing, China: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2007, pp. 660–669.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    R. P. Darken, et al., “Spatial Orientation and Wayfinding in Large-Scale Virtual Spaces: An Introduction,” Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, vol. 7, pp. 101–107, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    J. Glück and S. Fitting, “Spatial strategy selection: Interesting incremental information,” International Journal of Testing, vol. 3, pp. 293–308, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    D. Waller, et al., “The transfer of spatial knowledge in virtual environment training,” Presence - Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, vol. 7, pp. 129–143, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    R. L. Klatzky, et al., “Spatial updating of self-position and orientation during ral, imagined, and virtual locomotion,” Psychological science, vol. 9, p. 1998, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    D. H. Shin, et al., “View Changes in Augmented Reality Computer-Aided-Drawing,” ACM Transactions on Applied Perceptions, vol. 2, pp. 1–14, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    F. Mantovani, “VR Learning: Potential and Challenges for the Use of 3D Environments in Education and Training,” in Towards CyberPsychology: Mind, Cognitions and Society in the Internet Age, G. Riva and C. Galimberti, Eds., Amsterdam: IOS Press, 2001.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    C. Youngblut, “Educational uses of virtual technology,” VA: Institute for Defense Analyses, Alexandria IDA Document D-2128, 1998.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    H. Kaufmann, “Geometry Education with Augmented Reality,” Ph.D. Thesis, Vienna University of Technology, 2004.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    M. Bricken, “Virtual reality learning environments: potentials and challenges,” SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics, vol. 25, pp. 178–184, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    H. Kaufmann and D. Schmalstieg, “Mathematics and geometry education with collaborative augmented reality,” Computers & Graphics, vol. 27, pp. 339–345, Jun 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    T. Pintaric and H. Kaufmann, “Affordable Infrared-Optical Pose-Tracking for Virtual and Augmented Reality,” in Proceedings of “Trends and Issues in Tracking for Virtual Environments” Workshop, IEEE VR 2007, Charlotte, NC, USA, 2007, pp. 44–51.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Z. S. Szalavári and M. Gervautz, “The Personal Interaction Panel - A Two-Handed Interface for Augmented Reality,” Computer Graphics Forum, vol. 16, pp. 335–346, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    D. Schmalstieg, et al., “The Studierstube augmented reality project,” Presence - Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, vol. 11, pp. 33–54, Feb 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    H. Kaufmann, “Applications of Mixed Reality,” Habilitation Thesis, Faculty of Informatics, Vienna University of Technology, Vienna, 2009.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    H. Kaufmann and D. Schmalstieg, “Designing Immersive Virtual Reality for Geometry Education,” in Proceedings of IEEE Virtual Reality Conference 2006, Alexandria, Virginia, USA, 2006, pp. 51–58.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    H. Kaufmann and B. Meyer, “Simulating Educational Physical Experiments in Augmented Reality,” in Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH ASIA 2008 Educators Program, Singapore, 2008.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    H. Goldstein, et al., Classical Mechanics, 3rd ed. Reading, Massachusetts, USA: Addison Wesley, 2001.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, Course of Theoretical Physics: Mechanics, 3rd ed.: Butterworth-Heinemann, 1976.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    A. Seugling and M. Rölin, “Evaluation of physics engines and implementation of a physics module in a 3d-authoring tool,” Master thesis, Master thesis. Department of Computing Science, Umea University, Umea, Sweden, 2006.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Software Technology and Interactive SystemsVienna University of TechnologyViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations