Advertisement

The Tree of Knowledge System

  • Gregg Henriques
Chapter

Abstract

The fourth and final piece of the unified theory is the Tree of Knowledge (ToK) System, which attempts to provide a macro-level conception of context that gives us a way to place our hard-won scientific facts into an overarching conception of context that allows the truth to emerge. In the first chapter I introduced a basic representation of the ToK System. Figure 6.1 depicts the ToK System again, only this time there are some significant additions. One addition to this diagram is that now the four joint points are listed.

Keywords

Justification System Unify Theory Joint Point Modern Synthesis Eusocial Insect 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Beck, A. T. (1999a). Cognitive aspects of personality disorders and their relation to syndromal disorders: A psychoevolutionary approach. In C. R. Cloninger (Ed.), Personality and Psychopathology (pp. 411–429). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
  2. Beck, A. T. (1999b). Prisoners of hate: The cognitive basis of anger, hostility, and violence. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  3. Blitz, D. (1992). Emergent evolution. Boston: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  4. Broad, C. D. (1926). The mind and its place in nature. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner.Google Scholar
  5. Ceccarelli, L. (2001). Shaping science with rhetoric: The cases of Dobzhansky, Schrödinger, and Wilson. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  6. Chaisson, E. J. (2001). Cosmic evolution: The rise of complexity in nature. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Churchland, P. S. (1986). Neurophilosophy: Toward a unified science of the mind-brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  8. Dawkins, R. (1999). The extended phenotype: The long reach of the gene (2nd Ed). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Dennett, D. C. (1995). Darwin’s dangerous idea. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  10. Dobzhansky, T. (1937). Genetics and the origin of species. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Gieryn, T. (1999). Cultural boundaries of science: Credibility on the line. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  12. Henriques, G. R. (2003a). The tree of knowledge system and the theoretical unification of psychology. Review of General Psychology, 7, 150-182. doi: 10.1037/1089-2680.7.2.150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Henriques, G. R. (2004). Psychology defined. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 60, 1207–1221. doi:10.1002/jclp.20061.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Henriques, G. R. (2005). Toward a useful mass movement. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 61, 121–139. doi:10.1002/jclp.20094.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Henriques, G. (2008). The problem of psychology and the integration of human knowledge: Contrasting Wilson’s Consilience with the tree of knowledge system. Theory and Psychology, 18, 731–755. doi:10.1177/0959354308097255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jones, W. T. (1965). The sciences and the humanities: Conflict and resolution. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  17. Kim, J. (1999). Making sense of emergence. Philosophical Studies, 95, 3–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lumsden, C. J., & Wilson, E. O. (1981). Genes, mind, and culture: The coevolutionary process. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Maturana, H. R & Varela, F. J (1987). The tree of knowledge: The biological roots of human understanding. Boston: New Science Library.Google Scholar
  20. Mayr, E., & Provine, W. B. (1998). The evolutionary synthesis: Perspectives on the unification of biology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Morgan, C. L. (1923). Emergent evolution. London: Williams and Norgate.Google Scholar
  22. Nelson, T. O. (1996). Consciousness and metacognition. American Psychologist, 51, 102–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Quackenbush, S. W. (2005). Remythologizing culture: Narrativity, justification and the politics of personalization. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 61, 67–80. doi:10.1002/jclp.20091.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Quackenbush, S. W. (2008). Theoretical unification as a practical project: Kant and the tree of knowledge system. Theory & Psychology , 18, 757777. doi:10.1177/0959354308097256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rand, K. L., & Ilardi, S. S. (2005). Toward a consilient science of psychology. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 61, 7–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Reiser, O. L. (1958). The integration of human knowledge. Boston: Porter Sargent.Google Scholar
  27. Rorty, R. (1998a). Truth and progress: Philosophical papers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rorty, R. (1998b). Against unity. Wilson Quarterly, 22, 28–38.Google Scholar
  29. Rose, S. (1999). Review of Consilience by Edward O. Wilson. Endeavour, 23, 36–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sarason, S. B. (1989). The lack of an overarching conception in psychology. Journal of Mind & Behavior, 10, 263–279.Google Scholar
  31. Schrödinger, E. (1967). What is life? The physical aspect of the living cell and mind and matter. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Sellars, R. W. (1926). The principles and problems of philosophy. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  33. Shealy, C. N. (2005). Justifying the justification hypothesis: Scientific-Humanism, Equilintegration (EI) Theory, and the Beliefs, Events, and Values Inventory (BEVI). Journal of Clinical Psychology, 61, 81-106. doi:0.1002/jclp.20092.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Todorov, T. (1998). Consilience [book review]. The New Republic, 218, 29–33.Google Scholar
  35. Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (1992). The psychological foundations of culture. In J. Barkow, L. Cosmides, & J. Tooby (Eds.), The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (pp. 19–136). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Wheeler, W. M. (1928). Emergent evolution and the development of societies. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  37. Wilber, K. (2001). A theory of everything: An integral vision for business, politics, science, and spirituality. Boston: Shambhala.Google Scholar
  38. Williams, G. C. (1966). Adaptation and natural selection. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Wilson, E. O. (1975). Sociobiology: The new synthesis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Wilson, E. O. (1978). On human nature. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Wilson, E. O. (1998). Consilience: The unity of knowledge. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, Inc.Google Scholar
  42. Darwin, C. D. (1859/2008). On the origin of species: The illustrated edition. In D. Quamman (Ed.). New York: Sterling Publishing.Google Scholar
  43. Kurtz, P. (1998). Can the sciences be unified? The Skeptical Inquirer, 47–49.Google Scholar
  44. Burnett, G. (1998). Consilience [book review]. The American Scholar, 67, 143–147.Google Scholar
  45. Wilson, E. O. (1984). Biophilia. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyJames Madison UniversityHarrisonburgUSA

Personalised recommendations