Skip to main content

Key Chapter Points

ED physicians ranked 5th in frequency of malpractice claims. ED headache is not a diagnosis commonly associated with litigation. The “difficult patient” encounter usually occurs because of a combination of patient, healthcare provider, and situational factors. Be the BOSS when dealing with patients making unreasonable demands bysetting Boundaries, utilizing multiple treatment Options, Scripting responses to common patient concerns, and treating patients with Sincere concern and respect. Most errors in diagnosis in the ED stem from errors in thought processes during decision making rather than lack of knowledge. Physicians must understand the laws of their state and make sure that their diagnostic approach and approach to informed consent complies with state laws.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Kane CK. Medical liability claim frequency: a 2007–2008 snapshot of physicians. AMA Center for Economics and Health Policy Research, Aug 2010. http://www.ama-assn.org/ama1/pub/upload/mm/363/prp-201001-claim-freq.pdf. Accessed Nov 2010.

  2. Brown TW, McCarthy ML, Kelen GD, Levy F. An epidemiologic study of closed emergency department malpractice claims in a national database of physician malpractice insurers. Acad Emerg Med. 2010;17:553–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bigal ME, Serrano D, Buse D, et al. Acute migraine medications and evolution from episodic to chronic migraine: a longitudinal population-based study. Headache. 2008;48:1157–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Tepper SJ, Tepper DE. Breaking the cycle of medication overuse headache. Cleveland Clinic J Med. 2010;77:236–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Supornsilpchai W, le Grand SM, Srikiatkhaachorn A. Involvement of pro-nociceptive 5-HT2A receptor in the pathogenesis of medication-overuse headache. Headache. 2010;50:185–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hull SK, Broquet K. How to manage difficult patient encounters. Fam Pract Manage. 2007;14:30–4.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Baum N. Dealing with difficult patients. J Med Pract Manage. 2009;25:33–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Buse DC, Rupnow MT, Lipton RB. Assessing and managing all aspects of migraine: migraine attacks, migraine-related functional impairment, common comorbidities, and quality of life. Mayo Clin Proc. 2009;84:422–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. US Department of Health and Human Services SAMHSA website http://www.oas.samhsa.gov/. Accessed October 2010.

  10. Saper JR, Lake AE, Bain PA, et al. A practice guide for continuous opioid therapy for refractory daily headache: patient selection, physician requirements, and treatment monitoring. Headache. 2010;50:1175–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hansen GR. The drug-seeking patient in the emergency room. Emerg Med Clin N Am. 2005;23:349–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Rockett IR, Putnam SL, Jioa H, Smith GS. Assessing substance abuse treatment need: a statewide hospital emergency department study. Ann Emerg Med. 2003;41:802–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. D-Onofrio G, Degutis LC. Integrating Project ASSERT: a screening, intervention, and referral to treatment program for unhealthy alcohol and drug use in to an urban emergency department. Acad Emerg Med. 2010;17:903–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Longo LP, Parran T, Johnson B, Kinsey W. Addiction: part II. Identification and management of the drug-seeking patients. Am Fam Physician. 2000;61:2401–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Chan L, Winegard B. Attributes and behaviors associated with opioid seeking in the emergency department. J Opioid Manage. 2007;3:244–8.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Pope D, Fernandes CB, Bouthillette F, Etherington J. Frequent users of the emergency department: a program to improve care and reduce visits. Can Med Assoc J. 2000;162:1017–20.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Vincent C, Phillips A, Young M. Why do people sue doctors? A study of patients and relatives taking legal action. Lancet. 1999;343:1609–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Levinson W, Roter DL, Mullooly JP, Dull VT, Frankel R. Physician–patient communication. The relationship with malpractice claims among primary care physicians and surgeons. JAMA. 1997;227:553–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Tamblyn R, Abrahamowicz M, Dauphinee D, et al. Physician scores on a national clinical skills examination as predictors of complaints to medical regulatory authorities. JAMA. 2007;298:993–1001.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Croskerry P. Context is everything or how could I have been that stupid? Healthc Q. 2009;12:e171–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Graber ML, Franklin N, Gordon R. Diagnostic error in internal medicine. Arch Intern Med. 2005;165:1493–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kachalia A, Gandhi TK, Puopolo AL, et al. Missed and delayed diagnoses in the emergency department: a study of closed malpractice claims from 4 liability insurers. Ann Emerg Med. 2007;49:196–205.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Harris B, Hwang U, Lee WS, Richardson LD. Disparities in use of computed tomography for patients presenting with headache. Am J Emerg Med. 2009;27:333–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Elshove-Bolk J, Mencl F, van Rijwijck BF, et al. Validation of the Emergency Severity Index (ESI) in self-referred patients in a European emergency department. Emerg Med J. 2007;24:170–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Berner ES, Graber ML. Overconfidence as a cause of diagnostic error in medicine. Am J Med. 2008;121:S2–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Norman GR, Eva KW. Diagnostic and clinical reasoning. Med Educ. 2010;44:94–100.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Croskerry P. Cognitive forcing strategies in clinical decisionmaking. Ann Emerg Med. 2003;41:110–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Croskerry P. The importance of cognitive errors in diagnosis and strategies to minimize them. Acad Med. 2003;78:775–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Zeeberg P, Olesen J, Jensen R. Discontinuation of medication overuse in headache patients: recovery of therapeutic responsiveness. Cephalalgia. 2006;26:1192–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Rapoport AM, Weeks RE, Sheftell FD, Baskin SM, Verdi J. The “analgesic washout period”: a critical variable in the evaluation of treatment efficacy. Neurology. 1986;36 Suppl 1:100–1.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dawn A. Marcus MD .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Marcus, D.A., Bain, P.A. (2012). Managing Risk in the ED. In: Practical Assessment and Treatment of the Patient with Headaches in the Emergency Department and Urgent Care Clinic. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0002-8_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0002-8_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-0001-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-0002-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics