X-Ray Spectral Distributions from Thick Tungsten Targets in the Energy Range 12 to 300 kV

  • Ellery Storm
  • Harvey I. Israel
  • Douglas W. Lier


Bremsstrahlung emission from four x-ray tubes operating at 12 to 300 kV was measured. Spectral distributions are given in terms of absolute-photon and energy fluxes. Silicon and germanium semiconductors, sodium iodide scintillators, and a xenon proportional counter were used to measure the spectra. Detector distortions were corrected by assuming an undistorted spectrum, distorting the spectrum with a Monte Carlo computer program, and comparing the results with measurement. The assumed undistorted spectrum was revised until the Monte Carlo calculation gave satisfactory agreement with spectral measurements from all four types of detectors. The effects on the spectra of varying the tube potential, tube current, target aperture, and detector aperture were investigated. Corrections for the intervening material and the solid angle subtended by the detector were applied to obtain the absolute-photon and energy flux from the target. Total fluxes in the L lines,K lines, and continuum are given. X-ray-production efficiencies varied from 0.026% at 12 kV to 1% at 300 kV. The constant of proportionality varied in the range (0.23 to 0.73) × 10-6 kV-1.


Monte Carlo Calculation Sodium Iodide Monte Carlo Computer Program Tube Potential Target Angle 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements (ICRU) Report 10b, “Physical Aspects of Irradiation,” 1962.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements (ICRU) Report 17, “Radiation Dosimetry: X-Rays Generated at Potentials of 5 to 150 kV,” 1970.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    N. A. Dyson, “The Continuous X-Ray Spectrum from Electron-Opaque Targets,” Proc. Phys. Soc. 73, 924 (1959).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    R. C. Placious, “Dependence of 50- and 100-keV BremsStrahlung on Target Thickness, Atomic Number, and Geometric Factors,” J. Appl. Phys. 38, 2030 (1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    M. J. Ehrlich, “Scintillation Spectrometry of Low-Energy Brems-strahlung,” J. Res. Natl. Bur. Std. 54, 107 (1955).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    G. Hettinger and N. Starfeit, “Brems Strahlung Spectra from Roentgen Tubes,” Acta Radiol. 50, 381 (1958).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    M. H. Ünsworth and J. R. Greening, “Experimental Continuous and L-Characteristic X-Ray Spectra for Tungsten Target Tubes Operated at 15 to 30 kV,” Phys. Med. Biol. 15, 631 (1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    H. I. Israel, D. W. Lier, and E. Storm, “Comparison of Detectors Used in Measurement of 10- to 300-keV X-Ray Spectra,” Nucl. Instr. Meth. 91, 141 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    E. Storm, H. I. Israel, and D. W. Lier, “Bremsstrahlung Emission Measurements from Thick Tungsten Targets in the Energy Range 12 to 300 kV,” Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory Report 4624 (1971).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    E. Storm and H. I. Israel, “Photon Cross Sections from 1 keV to 100 MeV for Elements Z = 1 to Z = 100,” Nuclear Data Tables A7, 565 (1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    A. H. Compton and S. K. Allison, X-Rays in Theory and Experiment, D. Van Nostrand Co., New York, 1935, p. 89–90.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    R. D. Evans, The Atomic Nucleus, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1955, p. 616.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1972

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ellery Storm
    • 1
  • Harvey I. Israel
    • 1
  • Douglas W. Lier
    • 1
  1. 1.Los Alamos Scientific LaboratoryUniversity of CaliforniaLos AlamosUSA

Personalised recommendations