Anomalous Low Hysteresis Losses in NbTi Superconductors with Very Fine Filaments

  • C. Schmidt
Part of the An International Cryogenic Materials Conference Publication book series (ACRE, volume 36)


Hysteresis losses of multifilamentary NbTi/Cu/CuNi mixed matrix conductors with very fine filaments were measured in the frame of the VAMAS intercomparison. A calorimetric technique was developed for the purpose allowing short sample measurements in the microwatt range. This method allows an independent variation of the magnetic background field and the alternating field amplitude. For low amplitudes, the losses were found to be well below the values expected from the Bean model. A similar behaviour, found recently in magnetization measurements, was explained by reversible flux line motion. The present data are reasonably well described by an existing theory. The paper includes also the results of two samples having thicker filaments.


Critical Current Density Background Field Flux Line Hysteresis Loss Coupling Loss 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    F. Sumiyoshi et al., Jap. J. Appl. Phys., 25, L 148 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    J. R. Cave, A. Fevrier, T. Verhaege, IEEE Trans. Magn. 25, 1945 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    S. Takacs and A.M. Campbell, Supercond. Sci. Technol. 1, 53 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    K. Kuroda, Cryogenics 26, 566 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    C Schmidt, Cryogenics 25, 492 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    C. Schmidt, “Ac loss measurements on superconductors in the microwatt range”, submitted to Rev. Sci. Instrum.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    J. Lühning, Primärbericht No. 03.01.01.P46C, Kernforschungszentrum Karlsruhe (internal note, 1986). An almost similar expression was given by M.N. Wilson, “Superconducting Magnets”, Clarendon Press, Oxford (1983) for ΔB > ΔBP. For AB < ΔBp Wilson gives the result of a numerical calculation which is within ~ 7 % agreement with Eq. (1).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    A. J. M. Roovers et al., this conference, paper AY6Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    J. R. Cave, A. Février, H.G. Ky and Y. Laumond, IEEE Trans. Magn, 23, 1732 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    A. M. Campbell, J. Phys. C: Solid St. Phys., 4, 3186 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. Schmidt
    • 1
  1. 1.Kernforschungszentrum KarlsruheInstitut für Technische PhysikKarlsruheGermany

Personalised recommendations