Magnetization and Critical Currents of NbTi Wires with Fine Filaments

  • A. K. Ghosh
  • W. B. Sampson
Part of the Advances in Cryogenic Engineering Materials book series (ACRE, volume 32)


In high energy accelerators such as the SSC, the magnetization of the superconductor is an important component in determining the harmonic fields at injection (~0.3T). In an effort to reduce these residual fields, interest has focused on NbTi conductors with fine filaments which are expected to have a reduced magnetization as dictated by the critical state model. With this in view, the magnetization and critical currents were measured at 4.3K for a set of NbTi wires with filament diameters, d, ranging from 1.0 to 5.0 microns. The data show that, although the magnetization scales linearly with d, it does not do so with the product Jc d for d less than 3 μm. However, at these d values, the critical transport current density, Jc, of NbTi was observed to decrease rapidly as a function of d. The origin of this Jc degradation and its effect on the scaling of magnetization within the framework of the critical state model is explored. We also examine the question of the observed asymmetry of the hysteretic magnetization.


Critical Current Magnetization Loop Fine Filament Critical State Model Filament Diameter 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    W. B. Sampson, P. F. Dahl, A. D. McInturff, K. E. Robins, and E. J. Bleser, IEEE Trans, on Magnetics 15:114 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    P. Dahl et al., “Performance of Two 4.5m Dipoles for Reference Design D”, submitted to the 9th Int. Conf. on Magnet Technolgy, Zurich, 1985.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    M. Garber, W. B. Sampson and M. J. Tannenbaum, IEEE Trans. on Magnetics 19:720 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    A. K. Ghosh, K. E. Robins and W. B. Sampson, IEEE Trans. on Magnetics 21:328 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    M. Garber, M. Suenaga, W. B. Sampson and R. L. Sabitini, this conference.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    T. Ogadsawara, Y. Kubota, T. Makiru, T. Akachi, T. Hisanari, Y. Oda and K. Yasukōchi, IEEE Trans. on Magnetics 19:248 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    W. J. Carr and G. R. Wagner, in “Advances in Cryogenic Engineering — Materials”, Vol. 30, Plenum Press, N.Y. (1984), pp. 923–930.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    A. K. Ghosh, W. B. Sampson and P. Wanderer, submitted to the 1985 Particle Accelerator Conference, Vancouver, B.C.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    M. Garber, M. Suenaga, W. B. Sampson and R. L. Sabatini, “Effect of Cu4Ti Compound Formation on the Characteristics of NbTi Accelerator Magnet Wire”, submitted to the 1985 Particle Accelerator Conf., Vancouver, B. C.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    W. A. Fietz, M. R. Beasley, J. Silcox and W. W. Webb, Phys. Rev. 136:A335 (1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    A. L. Fetter and P. C. Hoenberg in “Superconductivity”, R. D. Parks ed., Mercel Dekker, N.Y. (1969), pp. 817–924.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    D. G. Hawksworth and D. C. Larbalestier, IEEE Trans. on Magnetics 17:49–52 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    S. A. Elrod, J. R. Miller and L. Dresner in “Advances in Cryogenics Engineering-Materials” Vol. 28, Plenum Press, N.Y., pp. 601 (1981).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. K. Ghosh
    • 1
  • W. B. Sampson
    • 1
  1. 1.Brookhaven National LaboratoryUptonUSA

Personalised recommendations