Enhanced Values of Hc2 in Nb-Ti Ternary and Quaternary Alloys

  • D. G. Hawksworth
  • D. C. Larbalestier


Recently the fusion community has been very interested in the design of toroidal field magnets for tokamak devices with peak conductor fields of up to 12 T. Such fields cannot be met by the use of Nb-Ti alloys at 4.2 K, since the upper critical field (H c2) is about 11 T at this temperature. However, 12-T operation may be feasible at reduced temperatures in Nb-Ti [12] or by appropriate alloying of the Nb-Ti, since it is known that the H c2 of Nb-Ti is depressed by its strong normal-state paramag-netism [3]. Previous work, both theoretical [4] and experimental [5–6], has shown that high-atomic-number additions can reduce the paramagnetic limitation by encouraging spin-orbit scattering processes. Additional possibilities for raising H c2 come from the dependence of H c2 on the normal-state resistivity, p n. The present work reports progress on the fabrication and evaluation of some Nb-Ti, Nb-Ti-Hf, Nb-Ti-Ta, and Nb-Ti-Ta-Hf alloys, some of which have values of H c2 superior to those of standard Nb-Ti alloys.


Critical Field Quaternary Alloy Toroidal Field Magnet Electronic Specific Heat Coefficient Tokamak Device 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    K. F. Hwang and D. C. Larbalestier, IEEE Trans. Magn., MAG-15(l):400 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    H. Segal, K. Hemachalam, T. A. de Winter, and Z. J. Stekly, IEEE Trans. Magn., MAG-15(1):807 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    T. G. Berlincourt and R. R. Hake, Phys. Rev. 131:140 (1963).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    N. R. Werthamer, E. Helfand and P. C. Hohenberg, Phys. Rev. 147:295 (1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    L. J. Neuringer and Y. Shapira, Phys. Rev. Lett. 17:81 (1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    M. Suenaga and K. M. Rails, J. Appl. Phys. 40:11 4457 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    H. Hillmann and K. J. Best, IEEE Trans. Magn., MAG-13(5):1568 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    E. Dalder, D. Beard, and F. Coffman, “The 12 Tesla Coil Development Program of the Office of Fusion Energy,” paper presented at the Third International Cryogenic Materials Conference, Madisen, Wisconsin (1979).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    E. J. Kramer, J. Appl. Phys. 44:1360 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    R. Marsh, Teledyne-Wah Chang, Albany, Oregon, private communication.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    H. Segal, Magnetic Corporation of America, Waltham, Massachusetts, private communication.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    I. I. Rayevskii, N. V. Stepanov, A. V. Dubrovin, O. S. Ivanov, and N. Alekseyevskii, Fiz. Met. Metalloved. 27(2):235 (1969).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. G. Hawksworth
    • 1
  • D. C. Larbalestier
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Wisconsin—MadisonMadisonUSA

Personalised recommendations