Advertisement

Distress, No Stress, Anti-Stress, Eustress: Where Does REST Fit In?

Chapter
Part of the Recent Research in Psychology book series (PSYCHOLOGY)

Abstract

As we all know, the early history of REST research centered around the purported ability of the technique to arouse high levels of stress, in the negative sense of that term. High levels of negative stress — or, as Selye called it, distress (1974) — were indicated by just about all of the measures administered by the McGill University team. The symptoms included, above all, the unwillingness of subjects to continue in the experiment after only about two days; and secondarily, such signs of mental aberration as hallucinations, spontaneous emotional shifts, heightened suggestibility, and deterioration of performance on cognitive, perceptual, and motor tasks (Bexton, Heron & Scott, 1954).

Keywords

Negative Stress Sensory Deprivation Stimulus Restriction Perceptual Deprivation Rest Experience 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Antonovsky, A. & Bernstein, J. Pathogenesis and Salutogenesis in War and Other Crises: Who Studies the Successful Copers? In: Milgram, N. (Ed.), Stress and Coping in the Time of War: Generalization from the Israeli Experience. New York, NY: Brunner/Mazel, 1986, p. 52–64.Google Scholar
  2. Bexton, W.H., Heron, W. & Scott, T.H. Effects of Decreased Variation in the Sensory Environment. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 1954, 8, 70–76.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Fine, T.H. & Turner, J.W., Jr. (Eds.). First International Conference on Rest and Self-Regulation. Proceedings. Toledo, OH: Iris, 1985.Google Scholar
  4. Goldberger, L. & Holt, R.R. Experimental Interference with Reality Contact (Perceptual Isolation): Method and Group Results. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 1958, 127, 99–112.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Heron, W. The Pathology of Boredom. Scientific American, 1957, 196, 52–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Lilly, L.C. The Deep Self. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster, 1977.Google Scholar
  7. Lilly, J.C. & Shurley, J.T. Experiments in Solitude, In Maximum Achievable Physical Isolation with Water Suspension, of Intact Healthy Persons. In: Flaherty, B.E. (Ed.) Psychophysiological Aspects of Space Flight. New York, NY: Columbia University, 1961, 238–247.Google Scholar
  8. Myers, T.I., Murphy, D.B., Smith, S. & Goffard, S. Experimental Studies of Sensory Deprivation and Social Isolation In: HumRRO Tech. Rept. 66–8, Washington, D.C.: George Washington University, 1966.Google Scholar
  9. Roy, C. Life Changes After Restricted Environmental Stimulation Therapy: Observations of a Psychiatrist. In preparation, 1989.Google Scholar
  10. Selye, H. Stress Without Distress. New York, NY: Signet, 1974.Google Scholar
  11. Solomon, P., Kubzansky, P.E., Leiderman, P.H., Mendelson, J., & Wexler, D. (Eds.) Sensory Deprivation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard, 1961.Google Scholar
  12. Suedfeld, P. Theoretical Formulations: II. In: Zubek, J.P. (Ed.) Sensory Deprivation: Fifteen Years of Research. New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1969, 433–448.Google Scholar
  13. Suedfeld, P. Changes in Intellectual Performance and in Susceptibility to Influence. In: Zubek, J.P. (Ed.) Sensory Deprivation: Fifteen years of Research. New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1969, 126–156.Google Scholar
  14. Suedfeld, P. The Benefits of Boredom: Sensory Deprivation Reconsidered. American Scientist, 1975, 63, 60–69.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Suedfeld, P. Restricted Environmental Stimulation: Research and Clinical Applications. New York, NY: Wiley, 1980.Google Scholar
  16. Suedfeld, P. Extreme and Unusual Environments. In: Stokols, D. & Altman, I. (Eds.) Handbook of Environmental Psychology. New York, NY: Wiley, 1987, Vol. I, 863–887. (a)Google Scholar
  17. Suedfeld, P. Groups in Isolation and Confinement: Environments and Experiments. Paper presented at the Conference on The Human Experience in Antarctica: Applications to Life in Space. Sunnyvale, CA, 1987. (b)Google Scholar
  18. Suedfeld, P. & Best, A.J. Satiation and Sensory Deprivation Combined in Smoking Therapy: Some Case Studies and Unexpected Side-Effects. International Journal of the Addictions, 1977, 12 337–359.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Taylor, S.E. Adjustments to Threatening Events: A Theory of Cognitive Adaptation. American Psychologist, 1983, 38 1161–1173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Turner, J.W., Jr. & Fine, T.H. (Eds.) Proceedings of the Second International Conference on REST. Toledo, OH: IRIS, 1987.Google Scholar
  21. Zubek, J.P. (Ed.) Sensory Deprivation: Fifteen Years of Research. New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1969.Google Scholar
  22. Zubek, J.P. Behavioral and Physiological Effects of Prolonged Sensory and Perceptual Deprivation: A Review. In: Rasmussen, J.E. (Ed.) Man in Isolation and Confinement. Chicago, IL: Aldine, 1973, 9–83.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1990

Authors and Affiliations

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations