Developmental Assessment

  • Marty Novak Hoffman
  • Ruth Zemke
Part of the Disorders of Human Learning, Behavior, and Communication book series (HUMAN LEARNING)

Abstract

There are several well standardized tools to measure children’s development including Gesell Developmental Schedules and the Bayley Scales of Infant Development (BSID) (Eiper & Azen, 1978). However, only a small body of information on the scores of children with Down syndrome exists that can be used as a basis for comparison with other children. The literature has shown that there is a wide range of abilities in children with Down syndrome and, therefore a wide range of performance ratings on developmental instruments (LaVeck & Brehm, 1978).

Keywords

Dition 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Angoff, W. (1984). Scales, norms, and equivalent scores Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.Google Scholar
  2. Bayley, N. (1969). Bay ley scales of infant development New York: The Psychological Corp.Google Scholar
  3. Buckley, L. (1984). Cardiac assessments. In S. Pueschel (Ed.), The young child with Down syndrome (pp. 351–664). New York: Human Sciences Press.Google Scholar
  4. Carr, J. (1970). Mental and motor development in young Mongol children. Journal of Mental Deficiency Research, 14 (31), 205–220.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Carr, J. (1975). Young children with Down’s syndrome London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
  6. Cunningham, C. (1982). Down’s syndrome: An introduction for parents London: Souvenir Press.Google Scholar
  7. Eiper, D.S., & Azen, S.P. (1978). A comparison of two developmental instruments in evaluating children with Down’s syndrome. Physical Therapy, 58 (9), 1066–1069.Google Scholar
  8. Harris, S. (1981). Relationship of mental and motor development of Down’s syndrome infants. Phys Occup Ther in Pediatr, 1, 13–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. LaGrow, S., & Prochnow-LaGrow, J. (1985). Consideration of bias in the assessment and placement process of exceptional children. In A. Rotatori & R. Fox (Eds.), Assessment for regular and special education teachers Austin, TX: Pro-Ed, Iric.Google Scholar
  10. LaVeck, B., & Brehm, S.S. (1978). Individual variability among children with Down’s syndrome. Mental Retardation, 16 (2), 135–137.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. LaVeck, B., & LaVeck, G.D. (1977). Sex differences in development among young children with Down’s syndrome. Journal of Pediatrics, 91 (5), 767–769.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Menkes, J. (1980). Child neurology, (2d ed.). Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger.Google Scholar
  13. Morss, R.J. (1983). Cognitive development in the Down’s syndrome infant: Slow or different? Brit Jour of Educ Psych, 53 (1), 40–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Schneider, J., & Brannen, E. (1984). A comparison of two developmental evaluation tools used to assess children with Down’s syndrome. Phys and Occup Ther in Pediatr, 4, 19–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Schnell, R. (1984). Psychomotor development. In S. Pueschel (Ed.), The young child with Down syndrome New York: Human Sciences Press.Google Scholar
  16. Silverstein, A.B., Legutki, G., Friedman, S.L., & Takayama, D.L. (1982). Performance of Down syndrome individuals on the Stanford-Binet intelligence scale. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 86(5), 548–551.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Zausmer, E., & Shea, A. (1984). Motor development. In S. Pueschel (Ed.), The young child with Down syndrome (p. 143). New York: Human Sciences Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marty Novak Hoffman
  • Ruth Zemke

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations