Skip to main content

Labor Market Discrimination in the United States

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Recent Research in Psychology ((PSYCHOLOGY))

Abstract

One important argument in favor of affirmative action programs is that, despite apparent changes in American attitudes about race and gender since World War II, race and sex discrimination persist. Labor market discrimination exists if equally productive workers receive systematically unequal treatment, by employers, on the basis of ascriptive characteristics such as race or gender. Economists commonly gauge discrimination by observing the gap in earnings between, say, Blacks and Whites or females and males, that cannot be accounted for by differences in observed characteristics such as education, experience, or seniority. Virtually every empirical study shows that nonwhites and females earn less than White males with similar observable characteristics and most scholars have concluded that discrimination is a feature of the American labor market.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Borjas, G. J. (1984). Race, turnover, and male earnings. Industrial Relations, 23, 73–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daymont, T. N., & Andrisiani, P. J. (1984). Job preferences, college major, and the gender gap in earnings. Journal of Human Resources, 19, 408–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Filer, R. K. (1983). Sexual differences in earnings: The role of individual personalities and tastes. Journal of Human Resources, 18, 82–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldin, C., & Polachek, S. (1987). Residual differences by sex: Perspectives on the gender gap in earnings. American Economic Review, 77, 143–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, N. L., & D’Amico, R. J. (1986). Employment and wage effects of involuntary job separation: Male-female differences. American Economic Review, 76, 373–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruhm, C.J. (1987). The economic consequences of labor mobility. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 41, 30–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruhm, C. J. (1988). A new test of labor market discrimination, unpublished manuscript, Boston University, Department of Economics Working Paper 149.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1989 Springer-Verlag New York Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ruhm, C.J. (1989). Labor Market Discrimination in the United States. In: Affirmative Action in Perspective. Recent Research in Psychology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-9639-0_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-9639-0_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-96971-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-9639-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics