Actuarial and Demographic Forecasting Methods

  • H. Dennis Tolley
  • James C. Hickman
  • Edward A. Lew
Part of the Springer Series in Statistics book series (SBH)


The purpose of this chapter is to present common methods of forecasting mortality used by actuaries in the American insurance industry. In a loose sense, the term forecasting refers to two different tasks, both of interest to the actuary. Of primary interest to actuaries are forecasts of the future mortality experience of groups. Individuals of a group are assumed to be subject to mortality according to some known set of probabilities. A second type of forecasting involves assessment of future patterns of the mortality process.


Interest Rate Life Table Life Insurance Forecast Method Insurance Product 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Beekman, J.A. 1985. Actuarial assumptions and models for social security projections. In Actuarial Mathematics, Vol. 35 (Panjer, H.H., Ed). Proceedings of the Symposium in Applied Mathematics. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.Google Scholar
  2. Bowers, N.L., Gerber, H.V., Hickman, J.C., Jones, D.A., and Nesbitt, C.J. 1984. Actuarial Mathematics. Itasca, Il: Society of Actuaries.Google Scholar
  3. Cramér, H., and Wold, H. 1935. Mortality variations in Sweden: A study in graduation and forecasting. Skandinavisk Akluarietidskrift11: 161–241.Google Scholar
  4. de Jouvenel, B. 1967. The Art of Conjecture. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  5. Delgadillo, L.M. (Ed.). 1980. The Future of Life Expectancy. Itasca, Il: Society of Actuaries.Google Scholar
  6. Hickman, J.C., and Miller, R. 1973. Time series analysis and forecasting. Transactions of the Society of Actuaries25: 267–329.Google Scholar
  7. Hickman, J.C., and Miller, R. 1981. Bayesian bivariate graduation and forecasting. Scandinavian Actuarial Journal57: 129–150.Google Scholar
  8. Jenkins, W.A., and Lew, E.A. 1949. A new mortality basis for annuities. Transactions Society of Actuaries1: 369–498.Google Scholar
  9. Jordan, C.W. 1967. Life Contingencies. Itasca, Il: Society of Actuaries.Google Scholar
  10. Miller, R. 1984. Evaluation of transformations in forecasting age specific birth rates. Insurance, Mathematics and Economics3: 263–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Record of the Society of Actuaries. 1979. Discussion of the Preliminary Report of the Committee on Valuation and Related Problems. Volume 5, No. 1, pp. 224–284.Google Scholar
  12. Record of the Society of Actuaries. 1981. Asset management for an insurance company. Volume 7, No. 4, pp. 1335–1391.Google Scholar
  13. Record of the Society of Actuaries. 1982. Management of assets in relation to liabilities. Volume 8, No. 4, pp. 1501–1561.Google Scholar
  14. Smith, D., and Keyfitz, N. 1977. Mathematical Demography. New York: Springer-Verlag.MATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. Dennis Tolley
  • James C. Hickman
  • Edward A. Lew

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations