Skip to main content

Spinal Stabilization: Is Fusion the Right Way?

  • Conference paper
Spinal Instability

Part of the book series: Contemporary Perspectives in Neurosurgery ((COPENEU))

  • 133 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter discusses current concepts of spinal stabilization from the anatomic, biologic, and biomechanical point of view. Stability must be defined, understood, and referenced to the functional spinal unit. The functional spinal unit is defined as two adjacent vertebra with intervening soft tissues, disc, and articular structures that connect them (30). This functional unit must remain intact as it has forces applied to it creating various stresses and strains on its component. In order to maintain stability, its components move relative to each other. Each element in the construct has individual biomechanical and viscoelastic properties, but the unit as a whole has separate properties distinct from its component parts. Stability, therefore, may be defined as the ability of the functional spinal unit in which, under physiologic load, no abnormal strain or excessive motion occurs and the neural elements are protected. The proper word in this context should be equilibrium. Normal physiologic motion is part of the definition. When forces are excessive, the range of motion exceeds normal tolerance and instability results. Instability may be acute, such as in fractures or dislocations from a motor vehicle accident or chronic, such as the segmental lumbar instability that results with progressive degenerative disc and facet articular disease. It may produce pain, and it may result in neurologic injury. Scoliosis and kyphosis represent a specific type of instability with impairment of normal coronal and sagittal balance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Asher M, Carson W, Heinig C, Strippgen W, Arendt M, Lark R, Hartley M. A modular spinal rod linkage system to provide rotational stability. Spine. 1988;13:272–277.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Banwart J, Asher M. Is iliac crest donor site mobidity overstated? 6th Annual Meeting, North American Spine Society Proceedings, 1991:228.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bridwell KH, Betz R, Capell AM, Huss G, Harvey C. Sagittal plane analysis in idiopathic scoliosis patients treated with Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation. Spine. 1990;15:644–659.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cochran T, Irstam L, Nachemson A. Long-term anatomic and functional changes in patients with adolescent idiopathic acoliosis treated by Harrington rod fusion. Spine. 1983;8:576–584.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Connolly J, Guse R, Lipiello L, Dehne R. Development of an osteogenic bone marrow preparation.J Bone Joint Surg. 1989;71(A):684–691.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Cotrel Y, Dubousset J, Guillaumat M. New universal instrumentation in spinal surgery. Clin Orthop. 1988;227:12–23.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dodd CA, Fergusson CM, Freedman L, Houghton GR, Thomas D. Allograft versus autograft bone in scoliosis surgery. J Bone Joint Surg. 1988;70B: 431–434.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ecker AN, Betz RR, Trent PS, Trent AC. Computer tomography evaluation of Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation in idiopathic scoliosis. Spine. 1988; 13:1141–1144.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Etaizeau JP, Czorny A, Miahle C, Kuhnast M, Prievot J. Use of vascularized bone grafts in surgery of the spine. Apropos of 6 cases. Rev Chir Orthop. 1989;75:166–171.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Graf H. “Safir” commercial publication—personal communication.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Grobler LJ, MoE JH, Winter RB, Bradford DS, Lonstein LE. Loss of lumbar lordosis following surgical correction of thoracolumbar deformities. Orthop Trans. 1978;2:239.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hanley EN, Levy J A. Surgical treatment of isthmic lumbosacral spondylolisthesis. Spine. 1989;14:45–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Heise U, Osborn JF, Duwe F. Hydroxyapatite ceramic as a bone substitute. Int Orthop. 1990;14:329–338.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hellier WG, Hedman TP, Kostwik JP. Wear studies for a dynamic intervertebral disc prosthesis. 6th Annual Meeting, North American Spine Society Proceedings, 1991:351.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Herron LD, Newman MN. The failure of ethylene oxide gas—sterlized freeze-dried bone graft for thoracic and lumbar spinal fusion. Spine. 1989;15:446–500.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Johnston CE, Ashman RB, Baird AM, Allard RN. Effects of spinal constructs stiffness on early fusion mass incorporated. Spine. 1990;15:408–912.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Knapp DR Jr, Jones ET. Use of cortical cancellous allograft for posterior spinal fusion. Clin Orthop RelRes. 1988;229:99–106.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kostuik JP, Maurais GR, Richardson WJ, Okajima Y. Combined single stage anterior and posterior osteotomy for corrections of iatrogenic lumbar kyphosis. Spine. 1988;13:257–266.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Lane WJ. Direct current electrical bone growth stimulations for spinal fusion. Spine. 1988;13:363–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. McAfee PC, Farey ID, Sutterlin CE, Gurr KR, Warden KE, Cunningham BW. Device related osteoporosis with spinal instrumentation. Spine. 1989; 14:909–918.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Mooney V. A randomized double blind prospective study of the efficacy of pulsed electromagnetic field for interbody lumbar fusion.Spine. 1990;15:708–717.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Nasca RJ, Lemons JE, Deinlein DA. Synthetic biomaterials for spinal fusion. Orthopedics. 1989;12:543–548.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Nasca RD, Whelchel JD. Use of cryopreserved bone in spinal surgery.Spine. 1987;12:222–227.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Brodsky AE, Hendricks RL, Khlil MA, Darden BV, Brotzman TT. Segmental (“floating”) lumbar spine fusion. Spine. 1989;14:447–450.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Senegas J. Canal lombaire etroit. S.O.F.C.O.T. July 1989. Rev Chir Orthop. 1990;76(Suppl 10):59–67.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Senter HJ, Kortyna R, Kemp WR. Anterior cervical discectomy with hydroxyapatite fusion. Neurosurgery. 1989;25:39–42, 42–43.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Siegel T, Siegal T. Current consideration in the management of neoplastic spinal cord compression. Spine. 1989;17:223–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Smith KR, Hunty TR, Sher MA, Anderson HC, Robinson RG. A study of bone stress shielding in the canine lumbar spine Orthop Trans. 1990;14:17.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Thalgott JS, Gardner V, White J, Lowery G. Management of metastatic lesions of the spinal column with plate stabilization. 6th Annual Meeting, North American Spine Society Proceedings, 1991:256.

    Google Scholar 

  30. White AA, Panjabi MM. Clinical Biomechanics of the Spine. 2nd ed. New York: JB Lippincott; 1990:6.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Wittenberg RH, Moeller J, Shea M, White AA 3d, Hayes WC. Compressive strength of autologous and allogenous bone grafts for thoracolumbar and cervical spine fusion. Spine. 1990;15:1073-B

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Zippel H, Schellnack, K Buttner K. Exchanging intervertebral disks. The concept and clinical experience using a cement-free intervertebral disk endoprosthesis of the “Charitie Modular SB.” Chir Narzadow Ruchu Ortop Pol. 1986;51:245–248.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1993 Springer-Verlag New York, Inc.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Neuwirth, M.G., Margulies, J.Y. (1993). Spinal Stabilization: Is Fusion the Right Way?. In: Holtzman, R.N.N., McCormick, P.C., Farcy, JP.C., Winston, H. (eds) Spinal Instability. Contemporary Perspectives in Neurosurgery. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-9326-9_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-9326-9_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-9328-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-9326-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics