Skip to main content

Nuclear and Cytoplasmic Changes During Oocyte Maturation

  • Conference paper
Preimplantation Embryo Development

Abstract

The success or failure of embryonic development is determined by the quality or maturational status of the gametes that participate in the formation of the conceptus. From a phylogenetic point of view, it is clear that while the genetic contribution of each gamete to the zygotic genome is a dominant goal in sexually reproducing animal forms, cytoplasmic contributions from the female gamete are vital to the early livelihood of the embryo (1). Studies of vertebrates and invertebrates on the mechanisms of maternal inheritance now illustrate with great clarity that both nutritional and informational molecules must be expressed and organized during the course of oogenesis in order for normal development to proceed upon fertilization (2). To what extent the developmental blueprint for embryogenesis is coupled with the process of meiosis itself is not at all clear, although insights into this interrelationship on a mechanistic level have derived from recent studies on the determinants of embryonic polarity evident at the terminal phases of oogenesis. One common expression of polarity in oocytes shared in diverse animal species is manifest in the asymmetric cleavage exhibited at the time of polar body extrusion, a process of dualistic function whereby nuclear reductive division occurs concomitant with the conservation of ooplasmic mass.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Wilson EB. The cell in development and heredity. New York: Macmillan 1928.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Melton DA. Pattern formation during animal development. Science 1991;252:234–40.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Buccione R, Schroeder AC, Eppig JJ. Interactions between somatic cells and germ cells throughout mammalian oogenesis. Biol Reprod 1990;43:543–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Albertini DF. Novel morphological approaches for the study of oocyte maturation. Biol Reprod 1984;30:13–28.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Lewin B. Driving the cell cycle: M phase kinase, its partners, and substrates. Cell 1990;61:743–52.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Daguet MC. In vivo change in the germinal vesicle of the sow oocyte during the follicular phase before the ovulatory LH surge. Reprod Nutr Dev 1980;20:673–80.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Mattson BA, Albertini DF. Oogenesis: chromatin and microtubule dynamics during meiotic prophase. Mol Reprod Dev 1990;25:374–83.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. McGaughey RW, Montgomery DH, Richter JD. Germinal vesicle configurations, and patterns of protein synthesis of porcine oocytes from antral follicles of different size as related to their competency for spontaneous maturation. J Exp Zool 1979;209:239–54.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Wickramasinghe D, Ebert KM, Albertini DF. Meiotic competence acquisition is associated with the appearance of M-phase characteristics in growing mouse oocytes. Dev Biol 1991;143:162–72.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Schatten G, Maul G, Schatten H, et al. Nuclear lamins and peripheral nuclear antigens during fertilization and embryogenesis in mice and sea urchins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1985;82:4727–31.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Calarco PG, Donahue RP, Szollosi D. Germinal vesicle breakdown in the mouse oocyte. J Cell Sci 1972;10:369–85.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Maro B, Howlett SK, Webb M. Non-spindle microtubule organizing centers in metaphase-II-arrested mouse oocytes. J Cell Biol 1985;101:1665–72.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Schatten G, Simerly C, Schatten H. Maternal inheritance of centrosomes in mammals? Studies on parthenogenesis and polyspermy in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1991;88:6785–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Messinger SM, Albertini DF. Centrosome and microtubule dynamics during meiotic progression in the mouse oocyte. J Cell Sci 1991;100:289–98.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. de Pennart H, Houliston E, Maro B. Post-translational modifications of tubulin and the dynamics of microtubules in mouse oocytes and zygotes. Biol Cell 1988;64:374–8.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gorbsky GJ, Simerly C, Schatten G, Borisy GG. Microtubules in the metaphase-arrested mouse oocyte turn over rapidly. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1990;87:6049–53.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Downs SM. Protein synthesis inhibitors prevent both spontaneous and hormone-dependent maturation of isolated mouse oocytes. Mol Reprod Dev 1990;27:235–43.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Hashimoto N, Kishimoto T. Regulation of meiotic metaphase by a cytoplasmic maturation-promoting factor during mouse oocyte maturation. Dev Biol 1988;126:242–52.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Centonze VE, Borisy GG. Nucleation of microtubules from mitotic centrosomes is modulated by a phosphorylated epitope. J Cell Sci 1990;95:405–11.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Verde F, Labbe J, Doree M, Karsenti E. Regulation of microtubule dynamics by cdc2 protein kinase in cell-free extracts of Xenopus eggs. Nature (London) 1990;343:233–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Motlik J, Rimkevicova Z. Combined effects of protein synthesis and phosphorylation inhibitors on maturation of mouse oocytes in vitro. Mol Reprod Dev 1990;27:230–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Gavin A-C, Tsukitani Y, Schorderet-Slatkine S. Induction of M-phase entry of prophase-blocked mouse oocytes through microinjection of okadaic acid, a specific phosphatase inhibitor. Exp Cell Res 1991;192:75–81.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Szollosi M, Debey P, Szollosi D, Rime H, Vautier D. Chromatin behavior under influence of puromycin and 6-DMAP at different stages of mouse oocyte maturation. Chromosoma 1991;100:339–54.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Szollosi D, Calarco P, Donahue RP. Absence of centrioles in the first and second meiotic spindles of mouse oocytes. J Cell Sci 1972;11:521–41.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Cran DG, Moor RM. Programming the oocyte for fertilization. In: Bavister BD, Cummins J, Roldan ERS, eds. Fertilization in mammals. Norwell, MA: Serono Symposia, USA, 1990:35–47.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hunter RHF, Cook B, Baker TG. Dissociation of response to injected gonadotropin between the Graafian follicle and oocyte in pigs. Nature (London) 1976;260:156–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Kaplan R, Dekel N, Kraicer PF. Acceleration of onset of oocyte maturation in vitro by luteinizing hormone. Gamete Res 1978;1:59–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Thibault C, Szollosi D, Gerard M. Mammalian oocyte maturation. Reprod Nutr Dev 1987;27:865–96.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Thibault C. Are follicular maturation and oocyte maturation independent processes? J Reprod Fertil 1977;51:1–15.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Morgan PM, Warikoo PK, Bavister BD. In vitro maturation of ovarian oocytes from unstimulated rhesus monkeys: assessment of cytoplasmic maturity by embryonic development after in vitro fertilization. Biol Reprod 1991;45:89–93.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Younis AI, Zuelke KA, Harper KM, Oliveira MAL, Brackett BG. In vitro fertilization of goat oocytes. Biol Reprod 1991;44:1177–82.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1993 Springer-Verlag New York, Inc.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Albertini, D.F., Wickramasinghe, D., Messinger, S., Mattson, B.A., Plancha, C.E. (1993). Nuclear and Cytoplasmic Changes During Oocyte Maturation. In: Bavister, B.D. (eds) Preimplantation Embryo Development. Serono Symposia, USA Norwell, Massachusetts. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-9317-7_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-9317-7_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-9319-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-9317-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics