Some Analytical Variations for Intercropping Studies
A number of variations of statistical design and analyses have been found in the published literature and are discussed in this chapter. The first topic discussed is a replacement series wherein the ratio of one crop to a second varies from zero to one. In this set-up, a land equivalent ratio (LER) approaches one as the proportion of a crop approaches unity. Some statistical analyses are presented for a set of data involving two wheat varieties where their proportions vary from zero to one.
KeywordsStarch Maize Assure Sorghum
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- de Wit, C.T. (1960). On competition. Versl. Landbouwk. Onderzoek 66, 1–82.Google Scholar
- de Wit, C.T. and J.P. van den Bergh (1965). Competition among herbage plants. Netherlands J. Agric. Sci. 13, 212–221.Google Scholar
- Federer, W.T. and B.T. Scully (1988). A parsimonious statistical design and breeding procedure for evaluating and selecting desirable characteristics over environments. BU-960-M in the Biometrics Unit Technical Report Series, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
- Gahlot, K.N.S., R. Vishal, and S.J. Vishwa Karma (1978). Urd “T.9” as intercrop with arhar “T.21”. Indian Farming 27, 7–8.Google Scholar
- Hall, R.L. (1974). Analysis of the nature of interference between plants of different species. 1. Concepts and extension of de Wit analysis to examine effects. 2. Nutrient relations in a Nandi Setaria and Greenleaf Desmodium with particular reference to potassium. Austral. J. Agric. Res. 25, 739–756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lal, D.N. (1979). A note on an index of utility of mixed cropping and allocation of such areas under separate crops. J. Indian Soc. Agric. Statist. XXXI, 59–64.Google Scholar
- Willey, R.W. (1979). Intercropping—its importance and research needs. Part 1. Competition and yield advantages. Part 2. Agronomy and research approaches. Field Crops Abstracts 32, 1–10 and 73–85.Google Scholar
- Williams, E.J. (1962). The analysis of competition experiments. Austral. J. Biological Sci. 15, 509–525.Google Scholar