Advertisement

Pancraniomaxillofacial Fractures

  • Alex M. Greenberg
  • Beat Hammer
  • Joachim Prein

Abstract

One of the most challenging problems in surgery, has been the treatment of patients with fractures involving the entire craniomaxillofacial skeleton. Until recently, these severe injuries had been primarily managed with maxillomandibular fixation, wire osteosynthesis and suspension, and head frames, with the all too frequent sequelae of orbital deformities, inadequate anteroposterior facial projection, shortening of facial height, and soft tissue malformations.1 Rigid fixation techniques now permit accurate reconstruction of these extensive fracture patterns with superior long-term results, without the frequency or severity of the kinds of defects seen with traditional methods. Because of these complications, many surgeons began to utilize craniofacial and orthognathic surgical techniques in the management of pancraniomaxillofacial fractures.2,3 As a result of this surgical progress, AO/ASIF instrumentation has undergone significant refinement, with a wide variety of hardware now available to permit stabilization of the many types of fragments encountered by these advanced approaches.1

Keywords

Orbital Floor Mandibular Fracture Condylar Fracture Maxillofacial Injury Canthal Ligament 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Gruss JS, Mackinnon SE: Complex maxillary fractures: Role of buttress reconstruction and immediate bone grafts. Plast Reconstr Surg 78: 9–21, 1986.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Manson PN, Hoopes JE, Su GT: Structural pillars of the facial skeleton: An approach to the management of LeFort fractures. Plast Reconstr Surg 66: 54, 1980.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Manson PN, Crawley WA, Yaremchuk MJ, et al.: Midface fractures: Advantages of imme-diate extended open reduction and bone grafting. Plast Reconstr Surg 76: 1, 1985.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Spiessl B: Internal Fixation of the Mandible. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1989, p 230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Haug RH, Prather J, Indresano AT: An epidemiologic Survey of facial and concomittant injuries. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 48: 926–932, 1990.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Guven O: A comparative study on maxillofacial fractures in central and eastern Anatolia. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 16: 126–129, 1988.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zachariades N, Papavassiliou D: The pattern and aetiology of maxillofacial injuries in Greece. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 18: 251–254, 1990.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Raveh J, Vuillemin T: The surgical one stage management of combined craniomaxillofacial and frontobasal fractures. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 16: 160–172, 1988.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rowe NL, Williams L: Maxillofacial Injuries. New York: Churchill Livingstone, p 604, 1985.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gruss JS, Babak PJ, Egbert MA: Craniofacial fractures, an algorithm to optimize results. Clin Plast Surg 19: 195–206, 1992.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pecaro BC, Erickson MF: Naso-orbital ethmoidal fractures. Oral Maxillofac Clin No Am 2: 146–147, 1990.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gruss JS, Phillips J, et al.: The importance of the zygomatic arch in complex midface repair and correction of post traumatic orbitozygomatic deformities. Plast Reconstr Surg 85: 878–890, 1990.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Glassman RD, Manson PN, Vanderkolk CA, et al.: Rigid fixation of internal orbital frac-tures. Plast Reconstr Surg 86: 1103–1109, 1990.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Stoll P, Schilli W: Primary reconstruction with AO miniplates after severe craniomax- illofacial trauma. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 16: 18–21, 1988.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Prein J, Hammer B: Stable internal fixation of midfacial fractures. Fac Plast Surg 5:221– 230, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Spiessl B: Maxillofacial injuries in polytrauma. World J Surg 7: 96–100, 1983.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Konstantinovic VS, Dimitrijevic B: Surgical versus conservative management of unilateral condylar process fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 50: 349–352, 1992.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Takenoshita Y, Shinbashi H, Oka M: Comparison of functional recovery after nonsurgical and surgical treatment of condylar fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 48: 1191–1195, 1990.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zide MF, Kent JN: Indications for open reduction of mandibular condyle fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 41: 89–98, 1983.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alex M. Greenberg
  • Beat Hammer
  • Joachim Prein

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations