Advertisement

Airborne Gravimetry, Altimetry, and GPS Navigation Errors

  • Oscar L. Colombo
Part of the International Association of Geodesy Symposia book series (IAG SYMPOSIA, volume 110)

Abstract

Proper interpretation of airborne gravimetry and altimetry requires good knowledge of aircraft trajectory. Recent advances in precise navigation with differential GPS have made it possible to measure gravity from the air with accuracies of a few milligals, and to obtain altimeter profiles of terrain or sea surface correct to one decimeter. These developments are opening otherwise inaccessible regions to detailed geophysical mapping. Navigation with GPS presents some problems that grow worse with increasing distance from a fixed receiver: the effect of errors in tropospheric refraction correction, GPS ephemerides, and the coordinates of the fixed receivers. Ionospheric refraction and orbit error complicate ambiguity resolution. Optimal navigation should treat all error sources as unknowns, together with the instantaneous vehicle position. To do so, fast and reliable numerical techniques are needed: efficient and stable Kalman filter-smoother algorithms, together with data compression and, sometimes, the use of simplified dynamics.

Keywords

Global Position System Carrier Phase Global Position System Receiver Double Difference Global Position System Orbit 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bell, R.E., Brozena, J.M., Haxby, W.F., and La Brecque, J.L., Continental margin of the Western Weddell Sea, Insights from Airborne Gravimetry and Geosat-Derived Gravity, Contributions to Antarctic Research, 1,1990.Google Scholar
  2. Bertiger, W.I., and Wu, S.C., Minimizing Selected Availability Error on TOPEX GPS Measurements, AIAA/AAS Astrodynamics Specialist Conference, Portland, Oregon, August 1990.Google Scholar
  3. Bierman, G.J., Factorization Methods for Discrete Sequential Estimation, Academic Press, N. York, 1977.Google Scholar
  4. Braasch, M.S., and Grass, F., Guidance Accuracy Considerations for Real-Time GPS Interferometry, Proceedings GPS’91, I.O.N. Satellite Division 4th International Technical Meeting, Albuquerque, New Mexico, Sept. 1991.Google Scholar
  5. Brozena, J.M., Mader, G.L., and Peters, M.F., Interferometric GPS: Three-dimensional Positioning Source for Airborne Gravimetry, J. Geophys. Res., 94, B9, 12153–12162, U.S.A., 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brozena, J.M., GPS and Airborne Gravimetry: Recent Progress and Future Plans, Proceedings KIS-90 Symposium, Banff, Canada, Springer-Verlag, N. York, 1991.Google Scholar
  7. Colombo, O.L., The Dynamics of GPS Orbits and the Determination of Precise Ephemerides, J. of Geophys. Res., 94, B7, 9167–9182, U.S.A., 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hatch, R., Instantaneous Ambiguity Resolution, Proc. KIS-90 Symposium, Springer-Verlag, N. York, 1991.Google Scholar
  9. Herring, T.A., Davis, J.L., Shapiro, I.I., Geodesy by Radio Interferometry: The Application of Kaiman Filtering to the Analysis of VLBI Data, J. Geophys. Res., 95, B8, 12561–12581, U.S.A., 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Krabill, W.B., and Martin, C., Aircraft Positioning Using GPS Carrier Phase Data, Navigation, Spring Issue, U.S.A., 1987.Google Scholar
  11. Lichten, S.M., High Accuracy GPS Orbit Determination: Progress and Prospects, in: Global Positioning System: An Overview, Bock, J., and Leppard, N., editors, Springer-Verlag, N. York, 1990.Google Scholar
  12. Lichten, S.M., and Neilan, R.E., Global Networks for GPS Orbit Determination, Proc. GPS’90, Ottawa, September 1990, The Canadian Inst, of Surv. and Mapping, 1991.Google Scholar
  13. Loomis, P., A Kinematic GPS Double-differencing Algorithm, Proc. 5th International Symposium on Satellite Positioning, Las Cruces, N.M., N. Mexico State U., 611–620, 1989.Google Scholar
  14. Lucas, J.R., Aerotriangulation without Ground Control, Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sensing, 53, 311–314, U.S.A., 1987.Google Scholar
  15. Mader, G.L., Dynamic Position Using GPS Carrier Phase Measurements, Manuscripta Geodaetica, 11, 272, 1986.Google Scholar
  16. Mader, G.L., and Lucas, J.R., Verification of Airborne Position Using GPS Carrier Phase Measurements, J. Geophys. Res., 94, B8, 10175–10181, U.S.A., 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Purcell, G.H., Srinivasan, J.M., Young, L.E., DiNardo, S.J., Hushbeck, E.L., Meehan, T.E., Munson, T.N., and Yunk, T.P., Measurements of Aircraft Position, Velocity and Attitude Using Rogue GPS Receivers, Proc. 5th International Symposium on Satellite Positioning, Las Cruces, N.M., N. Mexico State U., 1019–1028, 1989.Google Scholar
  18. Remondi, B.W., Recent Advances in Pseudo-kinematic GPS, Proc. GPS-90, Ottawa, 1991.Google Scholar
  19. Schenewerk, M.S., Mader, G.L., Chin, M., Kass, W., and Dulaney, R., Status of CIGNET and Orbit Determination at the US National Geodetic Survey, Proceedings GPS-90, Ottawa, 1991.Google Scholar
  20. Wells, D.E., Beck, N., Delikaraoglou, D., Kleusberg, A., Krakiwsky, E.J., Lachapelle, G., Langley, R.B., Nakiboglou, M., Schwarz, K-P, Tranquilla, J.M., Vanicek, P., Guide to GPS Positioning, Canadian GPS Associates, Fredericton, U. of New Brunswick, Canada, 1986.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Oscar L. Colombo
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Maryland/NASA Goddard Space Flight Center (926)GreenbeltUSA

Personalised recommendations