Skip to main content

Genetic Causes of Spontaneous Abortion

  • Chapter
The High-Risk Fetus
  • 149 Accesses

Abstract

Pregnancy loss is a very frequent phenomenon. At least 30% of pregnancies recognized on the basis of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) assays are lost, often prior to clinical recognition of pregnancy. Genetic factors are responsible for most losses in clinically recognized pregnancies, and probably also for most losses before clinical recognition. In this chapter we consider first the frequency and timing of pregnancy loss and then enumerate known genetic causes. Specific consideration of the role of non-genetic factors in pregnancy loss is discussed in Chapter 6.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Simpson JL, Carson SA. Causes of fetal loss. In: Gray R, Leridon H, Spira F, eds. Proceedings of seminar on biological and demographic determinants of human reproduction. Oxford: Oxford Press; in press.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Carson SA, Simpson JL. Spontaneous abortion. In: Eden RD, Boehm RH, eds. Fetal assessment: Physiological, clinical, and medio-legal principles: Ease Norwalk, CT: Appleton-Century-Crofts; 1989: 559–574.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Simpson JL. Aetiology of pregnancy failure. In: Chapman. MC, Grudzinkas JF, Chard T, eds. Endocrinology and metabolism in human reproduction. London: Springer-Verlag; pp. 11–35, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Simpson JL, Carson SA. Genetic and nongen-etic causes of fetal wastage. In: Sciarra JJ, ed. Gynecology and obstetrics. New York: Harper Row; volume 5, chapter 90, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Simpson JL. Fetal wastage. In: Gabbe SA, Niebyl JF, Simpson JL, eds. Obstetrics: normal and problem pregnancies. 2nd ed. New York: Churchill-Livingstone; 1991; 783–807.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Simpson JL. Genetics of fetal losses. In: Simpson JL, Golbus MS, eds. Genetics in obstetrics and gynecology. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, W.S. Saunders; in press.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Miller JF, Williamson E, Glue J, et al. Fetal loss after implantation: A prospective study. Lancet. 1980;2:554–556.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Edmonds DK, Lindsay KS, Miller JR, et al. Early embryonic mortality in women. Fertil Steril. 1982;38:447–553.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Whittaker PG, Taylor A, Lind T. Unsuspected pregnancy loss in healthy women. Lancet. 1983; 1:1126–1127.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Wilcox AJ, Weinberg CR, O’Connor JF, et al. Incidence of early loss of pregnancy. N Engl J Med. 1988;319:189–194.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Mills JL, Simpson, JL, Driscoll SG, et al. Incidence of spontaneous abortion among normal women and insulin-dependent diabetic women whose pregnancies were identified within 21 days of conception. N Engl J Med. 1988; 319:1617–1623.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Guzick DS, Wilkes C, Jones HW Jr. Cumulative pregnancy rates for in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 1986;46:663–667.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Buster JE, Bustillo M, Rodi IA, et al. Biologic and morphologic development of donated human ova recovered by nonsurgical uterine lavage. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985;153:211–217.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Formiglio L, Formiglio G, Roccio C Donation of fertilized uterine ova to infertile women. Fertil Steril. 1987;47.162–165.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Stevenson AC, Dudgeon MY, McClure HI. Observations on the results of pregnancies in women resident in Belfast. II. Abortions, hyda-tidiform moles and ectopic pregnancies. Ann Hum Genet. 1959;23:395–411.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Christiaens GCML, Stoutenbeek PH. Spontaneous abortion in proven intact pregnancies. Lancet. 1984;2:572.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wilson RD, Kendrick V, Wittman BK, et al. Risk of spontaneous abortion in ultrasonog-raphically normal pregnancies. Lancet. 1984; 2:920.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Gilmore DH, McNay MB. Spontaneous fetal loss rate in early pregnancy. Lancet. 1985; 1:107.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Cashner KA, Christopher CR, Dysert GA. Spontaneous fetal loss after demonstration of a live fetus in the first trimester. Obstet Gynecol. 1987;70:827–830.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Simpson JL, Mills JL, Holmes LB, et al. Low fetal loss rates after ultrasound-proved viability in early pregnancy. JAMA. 1987;258:2555–2557.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Leridon H. Human fertility: The basic components. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Tabor A, Philip J, Madsen M, et al. Randomized controlled trial of genetic amniocentesis in 4606 low-risk women. Lancet. 1986;1:1287–1293.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Working Party on Amniocentesis. An assessment of the hazards of amniocentesis. Report to the Medical Research Council by their Working Party on Amniocentesis. Br J Obstet Gynecol. 1978;85(suppl2):l-41.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hertig AT, Rock J, Adams EC. Description of human ova within the first 17 days of development. Am J Anat. 1956;98:435–493.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Hertig AT, Rock J, Adams EC, Menkin MC. Thirty-four fertilized human ova, good, bad and indifferent, recovered from 210 women of known fertility. A study of biologic wastage in early human pregnancy. Pediatrics. 1959;25: 202–211.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hertig AT, Rock J. Searching for early human ova. Gynecol Invest. 1973;4:121–139.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Angell RR, Aitken RJ, Van-Look PFA, et al. Chromosome abnormalities in human embryos after in vitro fertilization. Nature. 1983;303: 336–338.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Rudak E, Dor J, Mashiach S, et al. Chromosome analysis of human oocytes and embryos fertilized in vitro. Ann NY Acad Sci. 1985; 442:476.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Zenzes MT, Belkien L, Bordt J, et al. Cytologic investigation of human in vitro fertilization failures. Fertil Steril. 1985;43:883–891.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Angell RR, Templeton AA, Aitken RJ. Chromosome studies in human in vitro fertilization. Hum Genet. 1986;72:333–339.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Michelmman HW, Bonhoff A, Mettler L. Chromosome analysis in polyploid human embryos. Hum Reprod. 1986;1:243–246.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Plachot M, Junca AM, Mandelbaum J, et al. Chromosome investigations in early life. II. Human preimplantation embryos. Hum Reprod. 1987;2:29–35.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Papadopoulos G, Templeton AA, Fisk N, et al. The frequency of chromosome anomalies in human preimplantation embryos after in vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod. 1989;4:91–98.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Plachot M. Genetics of human oocytes. In: Proceedings, XII Congress, International Federation of Fertility Societies, Marrakesh, Morocco, 1989. Parthenon Press; volume 6, pp. 31–39, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Gropp A. Fetal mortality due to aneuploidy and irregular meiotic segregation in the mouse. In: Boue A, Thibault C, eds. Les accidents chromo-siques de la reproduction. Paris: NSERM, 1973:225–268.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Gropp A. Chromosomal animal model of human disease. Fetal trisomy and development failure. In: Berry L, Poswillo DE, eds. Teratology. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1975:17–35.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Watt JL, Templeton AA, Messinis I, et al. Trisomy 1 in an eight cell human pre-embryo. J Med Genet. 1987;24:60–64.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Boue J, Philippe E, Giroud A, et al. Phenotypic expression of lethal chromosomal anomalies in human abortuses. Teratology. 1976;14:3–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Jacobs PA, Angell RR, Buchanan IM, et al. The origin of human triploids. Ann Hum Genet. 1978;42:49–57.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Simpson JL. Disorders of sex differentiation: Etiology and clinical delineation. New York: Academic Press; 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Chandley AC. The origin of chromosome aberrations in man and their potential for survival and reproduction in the adult human populations. Ann Genet. 1981;24:5–11.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Simpson JL, LeBeau MM. Gonadal and statural determinants on the X chromosome and their relationship to in vitro studies showing prolonged cell cycles in 45,X; 46,X,del(X)(pll); 46,X,del(X)(ql3) and (q22) fibroblasts. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1981;141:930–939.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Guerneri S, Bettio D, Simoni G, et al. Prevalence and distribution of chromosome abnormalities in a sample of first trimester internal abortions. Hum Reprod. 1987;2:735–739.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Boue J, Boue A, Lazar P. Retrospective and prospective epidemiological studies of 1500 karyotyped spontaneous human abortions. Teratology. 1975;12:11–26.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Ledbetter DH, Martin АО, Verlinsky Y, et al. Cytogenetic results of chorionic villus sampling: High success rate and diagnostic accuracy in the United States collaborative study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990;162:495–501.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Tharapel AT, Elias S, Shulman LP, et al. Re-sorbed co-twin as an explanation for discrepant chorionic villus results: Non-mosaic 47, XX + 16 in villi (direct and culture) with normal (46,XX) amniotic fluid and neonatal blood. Prenat Diagn. 1989;9:467–476.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Ruzicska P, Cziezel A. Cytogenetic studies on midtrimester abortuses. Humangenetik. 1971; 10:273–297.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Warburton D, Kline J, Stein Z, et al. Cytogenetic abnormalities in spontaneous abortion of recognized conceptions. In: Porter IH, Hatcher NH, Willey AM, eds. Perinatal genetics: Diagnosis and treatment. Orlando, Fla: Academic Press, 1986;23–40.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Bauld R, Sutherland CR, Bain AD. Chromosome studies in investigation of stillbirths and neonatal deaths. Arch Dis Child. 1974;49:782–788.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Kuleshov NP. Chromosome anomalies of infants dying during the perinatal period and premature newborn. Hum Genet. 1976;34:151–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. MacLeod PM, Dill F, Hardwick DF. Chromosomes, syndromes and perinatal deaths: The genetic counselling value of making a diagnosis in a malformed abortus, stillborn, and deceased newborn. Birth Defects. 1979;15(A5):105–111.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Hassold T. A cytogenetic study of repeated spontaneous abortions. Am J Hum Genet. 1980;32:723–730.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Warburton D, Kline J, Stein Z, et al. Does the karyotype of a spontaneous abortion predict the karyotype of a subsequent abortion? Evidence from 273 women with two karyotyped spontaneous abortious? Am J Hum Genet. 1987; 41:465–483.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Alfi OS, Chang R, Azen SP. Evidence for genetic control of non-disjunction in man. Am J Hum Genet. 1980;32:477–483.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Alberman ED. The abortus as a predictor of future trisomy 21. In: de la Cruz FF, Cerald PS, eds. Trisomy 21 (Down’s syndrome). Baltimore: University Park Press; 1981;69.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Simpson JL, Meyers CM, Martin AO, et al. Translocations are infrequent among couples having repeated spontaneous abortions but no other abnormal pregnancies. Fertil Steril. 1989;51:811–814.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Simpson JL, Elias S, Martin AO. Parental chromosomal rearrangements associated with repetitive spontaneous abortions. Fertil Steril. 1981;36:584–590.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Daniels A, Hook EB, Wulf G. Risks of unbalanced progeny at amniocentesis to carriers of chromosome rearrangements: Data from United States and Canadian laboratories. Am J Med Genet. 1989;31:14–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Martin AO, Simpson JL, Deddish RB, et al. Clinical implications of chromosomal inversions. A pericentric inversion in No. 18 segregating in a family ascertained through an abnormal proband. Am J Perinatol. 1983;1:81–88.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Sutherland GR, Gardiner AJ, Carter RF. Familial pericentric inversion of chromosome 19 inv(19) (pl3ql3) with a note on genetic counseling of pericentric inversion carriers. Clin Genet. 1976;10:53–59.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Rao PSS. Reproduction in isolated human population and effects of consanguinity. In: Teoh E, Ratnam SS, Goh VHH, eds. Releasing hormones and genetics and immunology in human reproduction. Parthenon; 1987; 153–163.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Schacter B, Weitkamp LR, Johnson WE. Paternal HLA compatibility in fetal wastage, and neural tube defects. Evidence for T/t-like locus in humans. Am J Hum Genet. 1984;36:1082–1085.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Nishimura H, Takano K, Tanimura T, et al. Normal and abnormal development of human embryos: First report of the analysis of 1213 intact embryos. Teratology. 1968;1:281–290.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Opitz JM. Prenatal and perinatal death: The future of development pathology. Pediat Pathol. 1987;7:363–394.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Cordier MP, Sournies G, Domenichini, et al. Bilan de 100 autopsies pratiquees dans le service de maternite de l’Hotel-Dieu de Lyone sur une periode de 18 mois. J Genet Hum. 1985;33:295–300.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Dechelotte P, Malpuech G, Jacquetin B, et al. Apport de la vertification anatomique du foetus et du aouveau-ne pour le diagnostic et le consiel genetique. A propos de 221 autopsies. J Genet Hum. 1985;33:283–288.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Pierquin G, Dodinval P. L’autopsie foetale ou neonatale et le conScil genetique. L’experience du service de genetique humaine de Liege. J Genet Hum. 1985;33:275–81.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Craft H, Brazy JE. Autopsy: High yield in neonatal population. Am J Dis Child. 1986;140:1260–1262.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Meier RP, Manchester DK, Shikes RH, et al. Perinatal autopsy: Its clinical value. Obstet Gynecol. 1986;67:349–351.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Byrne J, Warburton D. Neural tube defects in spontaneous abortion. Am J Med Genet. 1986;25:327–333.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Simpson JL, Bombard AT. Chromosomal abnormalities in spontaneous abortions: Frequency, pathology and genetic counselling. In: Edmonds K, Bennet MJ, eds. Spontaneous abortion. London: Blackwell; 1987:51–76.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1993 Springer-Verlag New York Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Simpson, J.L. (1993). Genetic Causes of Spontaneous Abortion. In: Lin, CC., Verp, M.S., Sabbagha, R.E. (eds) The High-Risk Fetus. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-9240-8_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-9240-8_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-9242-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-9240-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics