Shifting Conceptions of Cognitive Development

  • Mark L. Howe
  • Robert Pasnak


Early in this century, interest in children’s cognitive development was motivated by the need to cultivate standardized, psychometric tests of intelligence. The dominant force driving many of these early investigations of the ontogeny of children’s cognition was that of associationism (e.g., Kendler & Kendler, 1962; Suppes & Ginsberg, 1963). As enthusiasm for this metaphor of cognition waned, Piaget’s (e.g., Inhelder & Piaget, 1958) logicism grew in popularity. This new image of the child-as-logician was fueled in large part, at least in North America, by Flavell’s (1963) masterful exposition of the tenets of Piaget’s theory of cognitive development. As research began to expose a variety of shortcomings in Piaget’s formalism, information-processing models (e.g., Siegler, 1981) and skills approaches (e.g., Fischer, 1980) began to appear. These newer models supplanted traditional Piagetian principles and enjoy a growing prominence in the cognitive development arena. As this century draws to a close, two major formalisms continue to dominate the cognitive development horizon: information-processing models in which the child is viewed as an abstract symbol manipulation device (e.g., Klahr, 1989; Klahr & Wallace, 1976) and Piagetian revivalism (for a review of neo-Piagetian theories, see Howe & Rabinowitz, 1990).


Cognitive Development Nonlinear Dynamic Modeling Developmental Review Verbatim Trace Infantile Amnesia 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bjorklund, D.F. (1987). How age changes in knowledge base contribute to the development of children’s memory: An interpretive review. Developmental Review, 7, 93–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bjorklund, D.F. (Ed.) (1990). Children’s strategies: Contemporary views of cognitive development. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  3. Case, R. (1985). Intellectual development: Birth to adulthood. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  4. Chi, M.T.H., & Ceci, S.J. (1987). Content knowledge: Its role, representation, and restructuring in memory development. In H.W. Reese (Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior (Vol. 20, pp. 91–142). New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fischer, K.W. (1980). A theory of cognitive development: The control and construction of hierarchies of skills. Psychological Review, 87, 477–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Flavell, J.H. (1963). The developmental psychology of Jean Piaget. Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Flavell, J.H. (1982). On cognitive development. Child Development, 53, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Howe, M.L., Brainerd, C.J., & Reyna, V.F. (Eds.) (1992). Development of long-term retention. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  9. Howe, M.L., Montevecchi, W.A., Rabinowitz, F.M., & Stones, M.J. (1991). Modeling adaptation in the next generation: A developmental perspective. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 14, 100–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Howe, M.L., & O’Sullivan, J.T. (1990). The development of strategic memory: Coordinating knowledge, metamemory, and resources. In D.F. Bjorklund (Ed.), Children’s strategies: Contemporary views of cognitive development (pp. 129–155). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  11. Howe, M.L., & Rabinowitz, F.M. (1990). Resource panacea? Or just another day in the developmental forest. Developmental Review, 10, 125–154.Google Scholar
  12. Howe, M.L., & Rabinowitz, F.M. (1991a). Development: Sequences, structure, and chaos. Annals of Theoretical Psychology, 7, 65–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Howe, M.L., & Rabinowitz, F.M. (1991b). Gist another panacea? Or just the illusion of inclusion. Developmental Review, 11, 305–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Howe, M.L., & Rabinowitz, F.M. (1992). Dynamic modeling, chaos, and cognitive development. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  15. Inhelder, B., & Piaget, J. (1958). The growth of logical thinking from childhood to adolescence. New York: Basic Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kendler, H.H., & Kendler, T.S. (1962). Vertical and horizontal processes in problem solving. Psychological Review, 69, 1–16.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Klahr, D. (1989). Information-processing approaches. Annals of Child Development, 6, 133–185.Google Scholar
  18. Klahr, D., & Wallace, J.G. (1976). Cognitive development: An information processing view. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  19. Kreindler, D.M., & Lumsden, C.J. (1992). A zeroth-order FTT narrative gistifier. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  20. Rabinowitz, F.M., Grant, M.J., Howe, M.L., & Mason, C. (1992). Reasoning in middle childhood: A linear dynamic model of transitive inference. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  21. Siegler, R.S. (1981). Developmental sequences within and between concepts. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 46 (Whole No. 189).Google Scholar
  22. Suppes, P., & Ginsberg, R. (1963). A fundamental property of all-or-none models, binomial distribution of responses prior to conditioning, with application to concept formation in children. Psychological Review, 70, 139–161.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Townsend, J.T. (in press). Chaos theory: A brief tutorial and discussion. In A.F. Healy, R.M. Shiffrin, & S.K. Kosslyn (Eds.), From learning to cognition: Essays in honor of William K. Estes. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  24. van Geert, P. (1991). A dynamic systems model of cognitive and language growth. Psychological Review, 98, 3–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mark L. Howe
  • Robert Pasnak

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations