The Uterus pp 141-154 | Cite as

Colposcopy of the Cervix

  • Louis Burke
Part of the Clinical Perspectives in Obstetrics and Gynecology book series (CPOG)

Abstract

Colposcopy was first developed by Hans Hinselmann in Germany in 1925. Investigators were curious, as they are today, with regard to the origin of cervical cancer. Hinselmann assumed that the primary focus of cervical cancer must occur as a minute ulceration that, although undetectible to the naked eye, might be appreciated by suitable low-power magnification and illumination. He designed an instrument that directed sharply focused light on the cervix and the image of this focused light was viewed through binocular magnification. Thus, a new field of clinical investigation, known as colposcopy, was started. Colposcopy, therefore, may e defined as the magnification of the gross appearance of the epithelium of the cervix, vagina, and vulva by means of an instrument that is essentially a stereoscopic binocular microscope of low magnification, usually 10 to 40 times, and a strong light.

Keywords

Formalin Estrogen Acidity Styrofoam Posit 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. Burke L, Mathews BE: Colposcopy in Clinical Practice. Philadelphia, FA Davis and Co, 1977.Google Scholar
  2. Burke L, Antonioli DA, Ducatman BS: Colposcopy: Text and Atlas. Norwalk, CT, Appleton and Lange, 1990.Google Scholar
  3. Coppleson M, Pixley E, Reid B: Colposcopy, ed 2. Springfield, IL, Charles C Thomas, 1978.Google Scholar
  4. Coppleson M: The colposcopic terminology. J Reprod Med 1976;16:214–219.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Ferenczy A: The ultrastructural dynamics of normal and neoplastic cervical squamous epithelium. The Colposcopist, December 1982, pp 1–6.Google Scholar
  6. Folkman J: Tumor angiogenesis: therapeutic implications. N Engl J Med 1971;285:1182.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Heinzl S: The relevance of various elements contributing to colposcopic diagnosis. The Cervix 1989;7:93–99.Google Scholar
  8. Kolstad P: Colposcopic diagnosis of dysplasia, CIS and early invasive cancer of the cervix. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1964;43(suppl)7:105–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kolstad P: The development of the vascular bed in tumors as seen in the squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix uteri. Br J Radiol 1965;38:216.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kolstad P: Colposcopic nomenclature and grading. The Colposcopist, September 1979, pp 1–3.Google Scholar
  11. Moseley KR, Tung VD, Hannigan EV, et al: Necessity for endocervical curettage in colposcopy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1986;154:992.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Oliveira A, Keppler M, Luisi A, et al: Comparative evaluation of abnormal cytology, colposcopy and histopathology in preclinical cervical malignancy during pregnancy. Acta Cytol 1982;26:636.Google Scholar
  13. Pixley E: Basic morphology of the prepubertal and youthful cervix. J Reprod Med 1976;16:221–230.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Sakuma T, Hasegawa T, Tsutsui F, Kurihara S: Quantitative analysis of the whiteness of the atypical cervical transformation zone. J Reprod Med 1985;30:773.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Sillman F, Boyce J, Fuchter R: The significance of atypical vessels and neovascularization in cervical neoplasia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1981;139:154.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Singer A: The uterine cervix from adolescence to the menopause. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1975;32:81–99.Google Scholar
  17. Stafl A, Mattingly RF: Angiogenesis of cervical neoplasia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1975;121:845.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Toplis PJ, Casemore V, Hallam M, Charnock M: Evaluation of colposcopy in the postmenopausal woman. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1986;93:843.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Wetrich D: An analysis of the factors involved in the colposcopic evaluation of 2194 patients with abnormal Papanicolaou smears. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1986;154:1339.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Zinser HK, Rosenbauer KA: Utersuchungen uber die angioarchitecktonic der normalen und pathologisch veranderten cervix uteri. Archiv Gynakol 1960;194:79–112.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Louis Burke

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations