Skip to main content

Ontology, Sublanguage, and Semantic Networks in Natural Language Processing

  • Chapter
Advances in Artificial Intelligence

Abstract

The main claim of the paper is that no significant progress in NLP semantics is possible without a comprehensive formal theory. It is demonstrated that, while having a great deal to offer to NLP semantics, linguistic semantics lacks such a theory. It is also argued that model-theoretical semantics, which is based on a formal theory, fails to reach any significant goals with regard to natural language semantics. It does, however, put forward the important idea of anchoring natural meaning representations in the real world. Such a direct anchoring, without the burden and constraints of truth values, is achieved by the ontologically-, sublanguage-, and semantic-network-based approach to NLPS, an approach in which theoretical needs and practical feasibility merge.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ajdukiewicz, K. 1935. Die syntaktische Konnexität. Studia Philosophica 1, pp. 1–27. Translated as: Syntactic connection. In: S. McCall (ed.), Polish Logic. London-New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 207–231.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aqvist, L. 1965. A New Approach to the Logic of Questions. Uppsala: University of Uppsala Press.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bar-Hillel, Y. 1964. Language and Information. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Bobrow, D. and T. Winograd 1977. An overview of KRL, a knowledge representation language. Cognitive Science 1, pp. 3–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Brachman, R. J., R. E. Fikes, and H. J. Levesque 1983. KRYPTON: A functional approach to knowledge representation. IEEE Computer 16: 10, pp. 67–73.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Brachman, R. J. and J. Schmolze 1985. An overview of the KL-ONE knowledge representation system. Cognitive Science 9, pp. 171–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Carnap, R. 1947. Meaning and Necessity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Carnap, R. 1963. Replies and systemetic expositions. In: P. Schilpp (ed.), The Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap. La Salle, IL: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chellas, B. F. 1980. Modal Logic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Chomsky, N. 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Friedman, J., D. B. Moran, and D. S. Warren 1978a. An interpretation system for Montague grammar. American Journal of Computational Linguistics 1978:1, Microfiche 74, pp. 23–96. Also: Paper N-4, Computer Studies in Formal Linguistics, Department of Computer and Communication Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Friedman, J., D. B. Moran, and D. S. Warren 1978b. Evaluating English sentences in a logical model: A process version of Montague grammar. Proceedings of COLING ‘78. Bergen, Norway. Also: Paper N-15, Computer Studies in Formal Linguistics, Department of Computer and Communication Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gallin, D. 1975. Intensional and Higher-Order Modal Logic with Applications to Montague Semantics. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Geach, P. 1950. Russell’s theory of descriptions. Analysis X, pp. 84–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hirst, G. 1983. Semantic interpretation against ambiguity. Providence, R.I.: Brown University TR CS-83–25.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hirst, G. 1987. Semantic Interpretation and the Resolution of Ambiguity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. Hobbs, J. R. 1985. Granularity. Proceedings of IJCAI ‘85. Los Angeles, CA, pp. 432–435.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hobbs, J. R. 1986. Overview of the Tacitus project. Computational Linguistics 12: 3, pp. 220–222.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Hobbs, J. R. and S. J. Rosenschein 1977. Making computational sense of Montagué s intensional logic. Artificial Intelligence 9:3, pp. 287–306.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Hughes, G. E. and M. J. Cresswell 1968. An Introduction to Modal Logic. London: Methuen.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Kaplan, D. 1964. Foundations of Intensional Logic, Ph.D. thesis. Ann Arbor, MI: University Microfilms.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kasper, R. and W. Rounds 1986. A logical semantics for feature structures. In: Proceedings of the 24th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. New York: Columbia University, pp. 257–266.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Katz, J. J. and J. A. Fodor 1963. The structure of a semantic theory. Language 39: 1, pp. 170–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kripke, S. 1963. Semantic considerations on modal logic. Acta Philosophica Fennica 16, pp. 83–94.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Levinson, S. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Lewis, D. 1972. General semantics. In: D. Davidson and G. Harman (eds.), Semantics of Natural Language. Dordrecht-Boston: D. Reidel, pp. 169–218.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  27. Lewis, D. 1973. Counterfactuals. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Montague, R. 1960. Logical necessity, physical necessity, ethics, and quantifiers. Inquiry 3, pp. 259–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Montague, R. 1968. Pragmatics. In: R. Klibansky (ed.), Contemporary Philosophy - La Philosophie Contemporaine. Florence: La Nuova Italia Editrice.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Montague, R. 1970a. English as a formal language I. In: Linguaggi nella società e nella tecnica. Milan: Edizioni di Comunità.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Montague, R. 1970b. Universal grammar. Theoria 36.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Montague, R. 1970e. Pragmatics and intensional logic. Synthese 22, pp. 68–94.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Nirenburg, S. and V. Raskin 1987b. The analysis lexicon and the lexicon management system. Computers and Translation 2, pp. 177–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Nirenburg, S. and V. Raskin 1987e. The subworld concept lexicon and the knowledge base management system. Computational Linguistics 13: 3–4, pp. 276–289.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Nirenburg, S. and V. Raskin 1990. Sublanguages and Minitheories. Dordrecht: Kluwer (forthcoming).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Pollard, C. and I. A. Sag 1987. Information-Based Syntax and Semantics. Volume 1. Fundamentals. Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Prior, A. N. and M. Prior 1955. Erotetic logic. Philosophical Review 64, pp. 43–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Quillian, M. R. 1968. Semantic memory. M. Minsky (ed.), Semantic Information Processing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 216–70.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Raskin, V. 1971. K teorii jazykovyx podsistem /Towards a Theory of Linguistic Subsystems/. Moscow: Moscow State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Raskin, V. 1974. On the feasibility of fully automatic high quality machine translation. American Journal of Computational Linguistics 1974:3, Microfiche 9.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Raskin, V. 1985a. Linguistic and encyclopedic knowledge in text processing. Quaderni di Semantica VI:1, pp. 92–101.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Raskin, V. 1985b. Once again on linguistic and encyclopedic knowledge. Quaderni di Semantica VI: 2, pp. 377–383.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Raskin, V. 1987a. Linguistics and natural language processing. In: S. Nirenburg (ed.), Machine Translation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 42–58.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Raskin, V. 1987b. What is there in linguistic semantics for natural language processing? In: Presentations from the 1987 Natural Language Planning Workshop: “Planning for Future Research: Directions for the Next Decade.” Blue Mountain Lake, N.Y.: Northeast Artificial Intelligence Consortium, WR-8703, pp. 78–96.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Rounds, W. and R. Kasper 1986. A complete logical calculus for record structures representing linguistic information. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science, June 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Schank, R. C. 1975. Conceptual Information Processing. Amsterdam: North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Scott, D. 1970. Advice on modal logic. In: K. Lambert (ed.), Philosophical Problems in Logic: Recent Developments. Dordrecht: D. Reidel, pp. 143–173.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Strawson, P. 1950. On referring. Mind 59, pp. 320–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Tarski, A. 1936. Der Wahrheitsbegriff in den formalisierten Sprachen. Studia Philosophica 1, pp. 261–405. Translated as: The concept of truth in formalized languages. In: A. Tarski, Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics. London-New York: Oxford University Press, 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Wilson, D. 1975. Presuppositions and Non-Truth-Conditional Semantics. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Zadeh, L. 1965. Fuzzy sets. Information and Control 8, pp. 338–353.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1990 Springer-Verlag New York, Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Raskin, V. (1990). Ontology, Sublanguage, and Semantic Networks in Natural Language Processing. In: Golumbic, M.C. (eds) Advances in Artificial Intelligence. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-9052-7_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-9052-7_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-9054-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-9052-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics