Abstract
There are several compelling reasons to assess functional status of patients treated by family physicians. Of these reasons, the evaluation of therapeutic interventions as related to clinical outcome, is perhaps the most important. Outcome evaluations are generally made using objective measures, such as reduction in blood pressure, change in selected laboratory values (e.g., serum creatinine and calcium), and crude qualitative patient responses expressed as “less pain” or “feeling better.” Yet, even precise laboratory results give an incomplete picture of the clinical situation. A patient taking antihypertensive medication who has achieved normal blood pressure may be incapicitated from the medication’s side effects. Chemotherapy can disable the patient in whom there is radiological evidence of tumor regression. Clearly, the current assessment of outcomes of treatment in ambulatory patients is both incomplete and imprecise. Functional status assessment is required in addition to precisely defined clinical end points.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Jagger C, Clarke H. Mortality risks in the elderly: Five-year follow-up of total population. Int J Epidemiol 17: 111–114, 1988.
Parkerson GR Jr, Gelbach SH, Wagner EH, et al. The Duke—UNC health profile: An adult health status instrument for primary care. Med Care 19: 306–828, 1981.
Gilson BS, Gilson JS, Bergner M, et al. The sickness impact profile: Development of an outcome measure of health care. Am J Public Health 65: 1304, 1975.
Fitts W. Manual: Tennessee Self-Concept Scale. Nashville, TN: Counselor Recordings and Tests, 1964.
Zung, WW. A self-rating depression scale. Arch Gen Psych 12: 63, 1965.
West SR, Harris BJ, Warren A, et al. Terminal care: A retrospective study of patients with cancer in their terminal year. New Zeal Med J 99: 197–200, 1986.
Nelson E, Wasson J, Kirk J, Keller A, et al. Assessment of function in routine clinical practice: Description of the COOP Chart Method and preliminary findings. J Chron Dis 40: (suppl 1): 5S - 63S, 1987.
WONCA Classification Committee. ICHPPC-2-Defined (International Classification of Health Problems in Primary Care), ed 3. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1983.
WONCA Classification Committee. IC-Process-PC (International Classification of Process in Primary Care). Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1986.
Lamberts H, Wood M. ICPC (International Classification of Primary Care). Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1987.
WONCA Classification Committee. An international glossary for primary care. J Fam Pract 13: 671–681.
Meenan RF, Gertman PM, Mason JH. Measuring health status in arthritis. The Arthritic Impact Measurement Scales. Arthritis Rheum 23: 146–152, 1980.
Melzack R. The McGill Pain Questionnaire: Major properties and scoring methods, Pain 1: 277–299, 1975.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1990 Springer-Verlag New York, Inc.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Froom, J. (1990). Disease-Specific Functional Status Assessment. In: Functional Status Measurement in Primary Care. Frontiers of Primary Care. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-8977-4_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-8977-4_5
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-97198-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-8977-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive