Skip to main content

Structure of the Lexicon: Functional Architecture and Lexical Representation

  • Chapter
Morphology, Phonology, and Aphasia

Part of the book series: Springer Series in Neuropsychology ((SSNEUROPSYCHOL))

Abstract

One of the basic assumptions in cognitive neuropsychology is that we can characterize a cognitive process as a set of representations that are computed in the course of cognitive performance, i.e., in the course of object recognition, sentence understanding, and the like. A principal task of the cognitive neuropsychologist is to describe the series of representations (R2) that are computed in the course of these cognitive activities. For any interesting cognitive process there are a series of representations that are assumed to intervene between the inputs and outputs of the process: I(nput) → R1, R2,… Ri,… → O(utput).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anderson, S.R. (1982). Where’s morphology? Linguistic Inquiry, 13, 571–612.

    Google Scholar 

  • Badecker, W., Hillis, A., & Caramazza, A. (in press). Lexical morphology and its role in the writing process: evidence from a case of acquired dysgraphia. Cognition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, R. (1983). Writing nonwords to dictation. Brain and Language, 19, 153–178.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Caramazza, A. (1988). Some aspects of language processing revealed through the analysis of acquired aphasia: the lexical system. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 11, 395–521.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Caramazza, A., & Hillis, A. (in press). Modularity: a perspective from the analysis of acquired dyslexia and dysgraphia. In R. Malatesha Joshi (ed.), Written Language Disorders. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caramazza, A., & Miceli, G. (1989a). Orthographic structure, the graphemic buffer and the spelling process. In C. von Euler, I. Lundberg, and G. Lennerstrand (eds.), Brain and Reading. Wenner-Gren International Symposium Series. Volume 54. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caramazza, A., & Miceli, G., (1989b). The structure of orthographic representation in spelling. Reports of the Cognitive Neuropsychology Laboratory. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caramazza, A., Miceli, G., Villa, G., & Romani, C. (1987). The role of the graphemic buffer in spelling; evidence from a case of acquired dysgraphia. Cognition, 26, 59–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cummings, D.W. (1988). American English Spelling. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, A.W. (1982). Spelling and writing (and reading and speaking). In A.W. Ellis (ed.), Normality and Pathology in Cognitive Functions. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, A.W. (1988). Normal writing processes and peripheral acquired dysgraphias. Language and Cognitive Processes, 3, 99–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillis, A., & Caramazza, A. (1989). The graphemic buffer and mechanisms of unilateral spatial neglect. Brain and Language, 36, 208–235.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hillis, A., Rapp, B., Romani, C., & Caramazza, A. (in press). Selective impairment of semantics in lexical processing. Cognitive Neuropsychology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lapointe, S.G. (1979). A Theory of Grammatical Agreement. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miceli, G., & Caramazza, A. (1988). Dissociation of inflectional and derivational morphology. Brain and Language, 35, 24–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miceli, G., Silveri, M.C., & Caramazza, A. (1985). Cognitive analysis of a case of pure dysgraphia. Brain and Language, 25,187–212.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morton, J. (1969). The interaction of information in word recognition. Psychological Review 76, 165–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Posteraro, L., Zinelli, P., and Mazzucchi, A. 1988. Selective impairment of the graphemic buffer in acquired dysgraphia: a case study. Brain and Language, 35, 274–286.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Prinzmetal, W., Treiman, R., & Rho, S.H. (1986). How to see a reading unit. Journal of Memory and Language, 25,461–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scalise, S. (1984). Generative Morphology. Dordrecht: Foris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Hülst, H. & Smith, N. (1982). The Structure of Phonological Representations (Part 1). Dordrecht: Foris.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1990 Springer-Verlag New York Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Caramazza, A., Miceli, G. (1990). Structure of the Lexicon: Functional Architecture and Lexical Representation. In: Nespoulous, JL., Villiard, P. (eds) Morphology, Phonology, and Aphasia. Springer Series in Neuropsychology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-8969-9_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-8969-9_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-8971-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-8969-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics