Magnetic Resonance Imaging Ophthalmology

  • Jeffrey L. Taveras
  • Barrett G. Haik


In 1952, a decade after their original findings, Edward Purcell of Harvard and Felix Bloch of Stanford won the Nobel Prize in physics for discovering the phenomenon of nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR). As an analytical chemistry tool, NMR made an enormous impact, yet no one envisioned its potential as a medical tool for obtaining high resolution images of the human body. Nevertheless, by building on the methods developed for computed tomography (CT) scanning, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has evolved over just a few short years into as powerful an imaging modality as CT. In some applications, it is far superior.


Acoustic Neuroma Magnetic Resonance Imaging Appearance Proton Density Image Gadolinium Diethylenetriamine Penta Acetic Acid Optic Nerve Glioma 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Saint-Louis LA, Haik BC. Magnetic resonance imaging of the globe. In: Advanced Imaging Techniques in Ophthalmology. Vol. 26, No. 3. Little, Brown, Boston, 1986.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    McCrohan JL, Patterson JF, Gagne, RM, et al. Average radiation doses in a standard head examination for 250 CT systems. Radiology 1987; 163:263–268.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Stark DD, Bradley WG. Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Mosby, St. Louis, 1988, pp. 258–265.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bradley WG, Kortman KE, Stuart BK. MRI in a cost sensitive environment. Adm Radiol 1985; 4(11): 18–21.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    New FJ, Rosen BR, et al. Potential hazards and artifacts of ferromagnetic and nonferromagnetic surgical and dental materials and devices in nuclear magnetic resonance imaging. Radiology 1983;147:139–148.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Edward JF, Di Chiro G, Brooks RA, et al. Ferromagnetic materials in patients: detection before MR imaging. Radiology 1985;156:139–141.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Erlebacher JA, Cahill PT, Panizzo F, et al. Effects of magnetic resonance imaging on DDD pacemakers. Am J Cardiol 1986;57:437–440.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Prasad N, Bushong SC, Thornby JL, et al. Effects of NMR on chromosomes of mouse bone marrow cells. MRI 1984;2:37–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Schwartz JL, Crooks, LE. NMR imaging produces no observable mutations or to cytotoxicity in mammalian cells, AJR 1982;139:583–585.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wolff S, James TL, Young GB, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging: absence of in-vitro cytogenic damage. Radiology 1985;155:163–165.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Prasad N, Lotzova E, et al. Effects of MR imaging on murine natural killer cell cytotoxicity. AJR 1987;148:415–417.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sweetland J, Kertesz A, Prato FS, Nantau K. The effect of magnetic resonance imaging on human cognition. MRI 1987;5:129–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kido DK, Thomas WM, Erickson JL, et al. Physiologic changes during high field strength MR imaging. AJR 1987;148:1215–1218.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Shellock, FG, Crues JV. Temperature, heart rate and blood pressure changes associated with clinical MR imaging at 1.5 T. Radiology 1987;163:259–262.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sacks E, Worgul BV, Merriam GR, et al. The effects of nuclear magnetic resonance imaging on ocular tissues. Arch Ophthalmol 1986; 104:890–893.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bradley WG, Newton TH, Crooks LE. Physical principles of nuclear magnetic resonance. In Newton TH, Potts G (eds): Advanced Imaging Techniques. Clavadel Press, San Anselmo, CA, 1983.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wehrli FW, Kanal E. Orbital imaging: factors determining MRI appearance. Radiol Clin North Am 1987;25:419–427.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sacco DC, Steiger DA, Bellon EM, et al. Artifacts caused by cosmetics in MR imaging of the head. AJR 1987;148:1001–1004.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Babcock EE, Brateman L, Weinreb JC, et al. Edge artifacts in MR images: chemical shift effect. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1985;9:252–257.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Felix R, Schorner W, Laniado M, et al. Brain tumors: MR imaging with gadolinium-DTPA. Radiology 1985;156:681–688.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Curati WL, et al. Acoustic neuromas: Gd-DTPA enhancement in MR imaging. Radiology 1986;158:447.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jeffrey L. Taveras
  • Barrett G. Haik

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations