What Do Children Know about the Legal System and When Do They Know It? First Steps Down a Less Traveled Path in Child Witness Research

  • Amye Warren-Leubecker
  • Carol S. Tate
  • Ivora D. Hinton
  • I. Nicky Ozbek

Abstract

The likelihood that an American child will participate in the legal system in some fashion has increased exponentially in recent years. From 1955 to 1975, juvenile crime rose in the United States by 1600 percent (Footlick, 1977). During those same years, more than half of all crimes were committed by juveniles (Uniform Crime Reports for the United States, 1975). Divorce increased 700 percent between 1900 and 1977, to the point that half of the children born in the 1970s have spent at least part of their childhood in a one-parent home (Keniston, 1977). Reports of child physical abuse increased 142 percent between 1976 and 1983, and an estimated 71, 961 American children were reported to be sexually abused in 1983 (American Association for Protecting Children, 1985). These statistics serve to highlight the fact that American children are more likely than ever to be confronted with the legal system; either as witnesses in abuse or custody cases, defendants in juvenile crime cases, or perhaps even plaintiffs in actions against their own parents or guardians (Westman, 1979).

Keywords

Cage Smoke Tate Defend Mete 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adelson, J., Green, B., & O’Neil, R. (1969). Growth of the idea of law in adolescenceDevelopmental Psychology, 1 327–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. American Association for Protecting Children, Inc. (1983)Highlights of Official Child Neglect and Abuse Reporting 1983. Denver, CO: The American Humane Association.Google Scholar
  3. Berliner, L., &; Barbieri, M.K. (1984). The testimony of the child victim of sexual assaultJournal of Social Issues, 40(2) 9–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ceci, S.J., Ross, D.F., &; Toglia, M.P. (1987). Age differences in suggestibility of children’s memory: Psycho-legal implicationsJournal of Experimental Psychology: General, 116 38–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chi, M.T.H. (Ed.). (1983)Trends in memory development research. Basel, Switzerland: Karger.Google Scholar
  6. Chi, M.T.H., &; Glaser, R. (1980). The measurement of expertise: Analysis of the development of knowledge and skill as a basis for assessing achievement. In E.L. Baker and E.S. Quellmalz, edsEducational testing and evaluation: Design, analysis and policy. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  7. Evans, M., &; Carr, T. (1984). The ontogeny of description. In L. Feagans, C. Garvey, &; R. Golinkoff, edsThe origins and growth of communcation. Norwood, NJ.: Ablex, 297–316.Google Scholar
  8. Flavell, J.H. (1982). Structures, stages and sequences in cognitive development. In W.A. Collins, edMinnesota symposia on child psychology (Vol. 15). Hillsdale, NJ.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  9. Flavell, J.H. (1985)Cognitive development 2nd ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  10. Flin, R., Stevenson-Robb, Y., &; Davies, G. (1987, May). Children’s knowledge of the law. Paper presented at the Brittish Psychological Society Development Section Conference, Exeter, England.Google Scholar
  11. Footlick, J.K. (1977). Children and the law. In T.J. Cottle, EdReadings in adolescent psychology: Contemporary perspectives. New York: Harper &; Row, 279–281.Google Scholar
  12. Goodman, G. (1984). The child witness: Conclusions and futureJournal of Social Issues, 40(2) 157–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Greenstein, F. (1965)Children and politics. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Grisso, T. (1981). Juveniles’; waiver of rights: Legal and psychological competence. New York: Plenun Press.Google Scholar
  15. Grisso, T., &; Lovinguth, T. (1982). Lawyers and child clients: A call for research. In J.S. Henning, edThe rights of children: Legal and psychological perspectives. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas, 215–232.Google Scholar
  16. Hess, R.D., &; Torney, J.V. (1967). The development of political attitudes in children. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
  17. Hogan, R., &; Mills, C. (1976). Legal socializationHuman Development, 19 261–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Keniston, K. (1977)All our children: The American family under pressure. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
  19. Kohlberg, L. (1963). The development of children’s orientations toward a moral order: I. Sequence in the development of moral thoughtVita Humana, 611–33.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Leming, J. (1978). Intrapersonal variation in stage of moral reasoning among adolescents as a function of situational contextJournal of Youth and Adolescence, 7 405–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Macaulay, S. (1987). Images of law in everyday life: The lessons of school, entertainment, and spectator sportsLaw and Society Review, 21 185–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Melton, G.B. &; Thompson, R.A. (1987). Getting out of a rut: Detours to less traveled paths in child-witness research. In S.J. Ceci, M.J. Toglia &; D.F. Ross, edsChildren’s eyewitness memory. New York: Springer-Verlag, 36–52.Google Scholar
  23. Nelson, S.A. (1980). Factors influencing young children’s use of motives and outcomes as moral criteriaChild Development, 51 823–829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pascual-Leone, J. (1970). A mathematical model for the transition rule in Piaget’s development stagesActa Psychologica, 32 301–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Piaget, J. (1965)The moral judgement of the child. New York: Free Press. (Original work published 1932).Google Scholar
  26. Saywitz, K.J. (In this volume). Children’s Conceptions of the legal system: “Court is a place to play basketball.”Google Scholar
  27. Saywitz, K.J. (1987). Children’s testimony: Age-related patterns of memory errors. In S J. Ceci, M.J. Toglia, &; D.F. Ross, edsChildren’s eyewitness memory. New York: Springer-Verlag, 36–52.Google Scholar
  28. Saywitz, K.J., &; Jaenicke, C. (1987, April). Children’s understanding of legal terms: A preliminary report of grade-related trends. Paper presented at the Biennial meeting of the Society for Research on Child Development, Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar
  29. Shultz, T.R. (1980). Development of the concept of intention. In W. A. Collins, edMinnesota symposia on child psychology (Vol. 13). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  30. Tapp, J.L., &; Kohlberg, L. (1971). Developing senses of law and legal justiceJournal of Social Issues, 27 65–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Tate, C.S., Hinton, I., Boyd, C., Tubbs, E., &; Warren-Leubecker, A. (1987, March). Children’s moral development and knowledge of the legal process. Paper presented at the Southeastern Psychological Convention, Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar
  32. Third Annual Symposium on Child Abuse (1987, February), Huntsville, AL.Google Scholar
  33. Torney, J.V. (1971). Socialization of attitudes toward the legal systemJournal of Social Issues, 27137–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Uniform Crime Reports for the United States, 1975 (1980). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  35. Warren-Leubecker, A., &; Bohannon, J.N. (1983). The effects of verbal feedback and listener type on the speech of preschool childrenJournal of Experimental Child Psychology, 35 540–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Warren-Leubecker, A. &; Bohannon, J.N. (1985). Language in society: Variation and adaptation. In J.B. Gleason, edThe development of language. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill, 331–367.Google Scholar
  37. Warren-Leubecker, A., Tate, C., &; Munday, G. (1986, November). “Jury is something you wear around your neck.” Children’s knowledge of the judicial process. Paper presented at the Tennessee Psychological Association Convention, Nashville, TN.Google Scholar
  38. Westman, J.C. (1979). Child advocacy: New professional roles for helping families. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  39. Whitcomb, D., Shapiro, E.R., &; Stellwagen, L.D., Esq. (1985)When the victim is a child: Issues for judges and prosecutors. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Amye Warren-Leubecker
  • Carol S. Tate
  • Ivora D. Hinton
  • I. Nicky Ozbek

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations