Skip to main content

What Do Professional Persons Think about Computers?

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Computers and Medicine ((C+M))

Abstract

A 64-item questionnaire was distributed through the mail to certified public accountants (CPAs), lawyers, pharmacists and physicians in the Baltimore City area to determine their experience with, and attitudes towards, electronic computers. Return rates were not significantly different for the four groups and averaged 27.7 per cent for all groups combined. The data analyses are based on 521 replies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Computing Comes Home, 1979 (January), Honolulu Star Bulletin, Cl.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gough, H. G., and Heilbrun, A., 1965, The Adjective Checklist Manual( Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lee, R. S., 1970, Social attitudes and the computer revolution. Public Opinion Quarterly, 34, 53–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lirtzman, S. I., 1977(Welcoming address), The Role of Human Factors in Computers: Symposium Proceedings (Metropolitan Chapter of the Human Factors Society, Baruch College and City University of New York), pp. 7–11.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Orcutt, J. D., and Anderson, R. E., 1974, Human-computer relationships: Interactions and attitudes. Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation, 6, 219–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Orcutt, J. D., and Anderson, R. E., 1977, Social interaction, dehumanization, and the `computerized other’. Sociology and Social Research, 61, 380–397.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sansweet, S. J., 1980, MATTEL tries to lure skeptical consumers by selling computers as high-priced fun. Wall Street Journal, 15.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Schuyten, P. J., 1979, Home computer: Demand lags. New York Times, 128, D2.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Shye, S., and Elizur, D., 1976, Worries about deprivation of job rewards following computerization: A partial-order scalogram analysis. Human Relations, 29, 63–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Toops, H. A., 1934, Validating the questionnaire method. Personnel Research, 9, 134–138.

    Google Scholar 

  11. U.S. Department of Labor, 1965, Dictionary of Occupational Titles. Volume II. Occupational Classification(3rd ed.) (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1982 Taylor & Francis Ltd.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Zoltan-Ford, E., Chapanis, A. (1982). What Do Professional Persons Think about Computers?. In: Anderson, J.G., Jay, S.J. (eds) Use and Impact of Computers in Clinical Medicine. Computers and Medicine. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-8674-2_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-8674-2_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-8676-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-8674-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics