Computers and Clinical Medicine: Implications for the Practice of Medicine

  • James G. Anderson
  • Stephen J. Jay
Part of the Computers and Medicine book series (C+M)

Abstract

Computers have the potential to dramatically extend the physician’s ability to provide health care. At the same time, computer applications in medicine may significantly alter the institutional role of the physician, the nature of the doctor-patient relation, and the organization of the health care delivery system.

Keywords

Univer Rote 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Reiser, S.J. Medicine and the Reign of Technology. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Meindl, J.D. Microelectronics and computers in medicine. Science 1982; 215: 792–797.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Computer applications in health care. Hyatsville, MD: National Center for Health Services Research, 1980 (DHHS Publication No. PHS 80–3251).Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Muller, H.J. The Children of Frankenstein. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1970.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Starr, P. The Social Transformation of American Medicine. New York: Basic Books, 1983.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Schwartz, W.B. Medicine and the computer: the promise and problems of change. New Eng J Med 1970; 283: 1257–1264.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Duda, R.O. and E.H. Shortliffe. Expert systems research. Science 1983; 220: 261–268.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Coye, R.D. and M.F. Hansen. The “doctor’s assistant:” a survey of physicians’ expectations. JAMA 1969; 209: 529–533.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Walker, C.H. “Batch” or “on-line” for child health—a review. Brit Med J 1980; 281: 90–92.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Jay, S.J. and J.G. Anderson. Computerized hospital information systems: their future role in medicine. J Royal Soc Med 1982; 75: 303–305.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Singer, J., H.S. Sacks, F. Lucente, and T.C. Chalmers. Physician attitudes toward applications of computer data base systems. JAMA 1983; 249: 1610 1614.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    Banta, H.D., A.K. Burns, and C.J. Behney. Policy implications of the diffusion and control of medical technology. Annals, AAPSS 1983; 468:165–181.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    Freidson, E. Doctoring Together: a Study of Professional Social Control. New York: Elsevier, 1976.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    Freidson, E. Profession of Medicine: a Study of the Sociology of Applied Knowledge. New York: Dodd-Mead, 1970.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    Field, M. Doctor and Patient in Soviet Russia. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1957.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    Mechanic, D. The growth of medical technology and bureaucracy: implications for medical care. Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly 1977; 55: 61–78.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    Department of Health, Education and Welfare. Report of the Secretary’s commission on medical malpractice. Washington, DC: DHEW 1973.Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    Schroeder, S.A. and J.A. Showstack. Financial incentives to perform medical procedures and laboratory tests: illustrative models of office practice. Medical Care 1978; 16: 289–298.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    Levinson, D. Information, computers, and clinical practice. JAMA 1983; 249: 607–609.Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    Glantz, S.A. Computers in clinical medicine: a critique. Computer 1978; 11: 68–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    Weizenbaum, J. Computer Power and Human Reason: from Judgment to Calculation. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman & Co., 1976.Google Scholar
  22. [22]
    Howard, J. and A. Strauss, eds. Humanizing Health Care. New York: Wiley-Interscience, 1975.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© American Association for Medical Systems and Informatics 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • James G. Anderson
  • Stephen J. Jay

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations