Advertisement

The Pathology of Univentricular Atrioventricular Connection

  • Robert H. Anderson
  • Siew Yen Ho
  • James R. Zuberbuhler
Conference paper

Abstract

Lesions described according to the presumed singularity of their ventricular mass create problems in nomenclature and understanding. Included are hearts with double-inlet ventricle and those with atrioventricular valve atresia. In recent years, along with various colleagues [1–3], we have argued that all hearts with double-inlet should be considered (in terms of ventricular morphology) along with those having the type of atrioventricular valve atresia, which is characterized by absence of one atrioventricular connection. Critics said that our anatomic concept was flawed, because we used double-inlet atrioventricular connection as our unifying hallmark. In fact, the morphologic concept we promoted was entirely accurate. The confusion related to our illogical and meaningless use of the adjective “univentricular” (or “single”) to describe the ventricular mass in hearts that obviously possessed two ventricles. The resolution of this problem is simple and effective: to apply the adjective “univentricular” to the appropriate feature it describes—namely, the atrioventricular connection.

Keywords

Tricuspid Atresia Univentricular Heart Ventricular Morphology Atrioventricular Junction Atrial Chamber 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Anderson RH, Becker AE, Wilkinson JL, Gerlis LM: Morphogenesis of univentricular hearts. Br Heart J 38: 558–572, 1976.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Anderson RH, Macartney FJ, Tynan M, Becker AE, Freedom RM, God-Man MJ, Hunter S, Et Al: Univentricular atrioventriculaI connection: the single ventricle trap unsprung. Pediatr Cardiol 4: 273–280, 1983.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Anderson RH, Becker AE, Tynan M, Macartney FJ, Rigby ML, Wilkinson JL: The univentricular atrioventricular connection: getting to the root of a thorny problem. Am J Cardiol 54: 822–828, 1984.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Huhta JC, Seward JB, Tajik AJ, Hagler DJ, Edwards WD: Two-dimensional echocardiographic spectrum of univentricular atrioventricular connection. J Am Coll Cardiol 5: 149–157, 1985.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Van Praagh R, Van Praagh S, Vlad P, Keith JD: Anatomic types of congenital dextrocardia. Diagnostic and embryologic implications. Am J Cardiol 13: 510–531, 1964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Van Praagh R: Diagnosis of complex congenital heart disease: morphologic-anatomic method and terminology. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 7:115–120, 1984.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Anderson RH, Becker AE, Lucchese FA, Meier MA, Rigby ML, Soto B: Morphology of Congenital Heart Disease. Angiocardiographic, Echocardiographic and Surgical Correlates. Tunbridge Wells, UK, Castle House Publications Ltd, 1983, 7: 11–22.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kirklin JW, Pacifico AD, Bargeron LM, Soto B: Cardiac repair in anatomically corrected malposition of the great arteries. Circulation 48: 153–159, 1973.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Anderson RH, Becker AE, Macartney FJ, Shinebourne EA, Wilkinson JL, Tynan MJ: Is “tricuspid atresia” a univentricular heart. Pediatr Cardiol 1: 51–56, 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Keeton BR, Macartney FJ, Hunter S, Mortera C, Rees P, Shinebourne EA, Tynan MJ, Wilkinson JL, Anderson RH. Univentricular heart of right ventricular type with double or common inlet. Circulation 59: 403–411, 1979.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert H. Anderson
  • Siew Yen Ho
  • James R. Zuberbuhler

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations