Skip to main content
  • 508 Accesses

Abstract

The plastic design of steel structures has several advantages over the elastic design, of which the most important are simplified procedures, savings in the cost, and more realistic representation of the actual behavior of steel strucĀ­tures [1.1]. These advantages are due to the fact that the plastic design fully uses the important property of steel called ductility. This chapter will focus on the effects of ductility of the steel on the behavior of steel structures and show the benefits of the plastic methods that are derived from this property. To demonstrate the benefits of ductility, we will present two examples: first a hot-rolled section with residual stresses and second a plate with a hole. For both examples, the material is idealized to have an elastic-perfectly plastic stress-strain behavior as shown in Fig. 1.4.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Drucker, D.C., ā€œPlastic Design Methodsā€”Advantages and Limitations,ā€ Trans. of Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers, Vol. 65, pp. 172ā€“190, 1957.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  2. Kazinczy, G., ā€œKiserletek Befalazott Tartokkalā€ (ā€œExperiments with Clamped Girdersā€), Betonszemle, 2(4), p. 68; 2(5), p. 83; 2 (6), p. 101, 1914.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  3. Maier-Leibnitz, H. ā€œContribution to the Problem of Ultimate Carrying Capacity of Simple and Continuous Beams of Structural Steel and Timber,ā€ Die Bautechnik, 1(6), 1927.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  4. Baker, J.F., ā€œA Review of Recent Investigations into the Behavior of Steel Frames in the Plastic Range,ā€ J. Inst. Civil Eng., London, 31 (3), pp. 185ā€“240, 1949.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  5. Symonds, P.S., and Neal, B.G., ā€œRecent Progress in the Plastic Methods of Structural Analysis,ā€ J. Franklin Inst., 252, pp. 383ā€“407 and 469ā€“492, 1951.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  6. Johnston, B.G., Yang, C.H., and Beedle, L.S., ā€œAn Evaluation of Plastic Analysis as Applied to Structural Design,ā€ Welding J., 32(5), p. 224-s, 1953.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  7. Beedle, L.S., Thurlimann, B., and Ketter, R.L., Plastic Design in Structural Steel, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, Pa., and American Institute of Steel Construction, New York, 1955.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  8. Beedle, L.S., Plastic Design of Steel Frames, John Wiley and Sons, New York 1958.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  9. Manual of Steel Constructionā€”Allowable Stress Design, ninth edition, AISC, Chicago, July 1989.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  10. Plastic Design in Steelā€”A Guide and Commentary, Manual 41, American Society of Civil Engineers, New York, 1971.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  11. Load and Resistance Factor Design Specification for Structural Steel Buildings, AISC, Chicago, Dec. 1, 1993.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  12. White, D.W., Liew, J.Y.R., and Chen, W.F., ā€œSecond-Order Inelastic Analysis for Frame Design,ā€ A report submitted to SSRC Task Group 29 on Recent Research and the Perceived State-of-the-Art, CE-STR-91ā€“12, School of Civil Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 115 pp.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  13. Ravindra, M.K., and Galambos, T.V., ā€œLoad and Resistance Factor Design for Steel,ā€ J. Structural Division, ASCE, 104 (ST9), pp. 1337ā€“1354, Sept. 1978.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  14. Ellingwood, B., MacGregor, J.G., Galambos, T.V., and Cornell, C.A., ā€œProbability-Based Load Criteria, Load Factors and Load Combinations,ā€ J. Structural Division, ASCE, 108 (ST5), pp. 978ā€“997, May 1982.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  15. Building Code Requirements for Minimum Design Loads in Buildings and Other Structures, ANSI A58.1ā€“1982, American National Standards Institute, New York, 1982.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  16. Ang, A.H-S., and Cornell, C.A., ā€œReliability Bases of Structural Safety and Design,ā€ J. Structural Division, ASCE, 100 (ST9), pp. 1755ā€“1769, Sept. 1974.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  17. Australian Limit States Specification, AS4100, Australian Institute of Steel Construction, Oct. 1990.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  18. Vogel, U., ā€œCalibrating Frames,ā€ Stahlbau, 54, pp. 295ā€“301, 1985.

    Google ScholarĀ 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

Ā© 1995 Springer-Verlag New York Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chen, W.F., Sohal, I. (1995). Basic Concepts. In: Plastic Design and Second-Order Analysis of Steel Frames. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-8428-1_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-8428-1_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-8430-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-8428-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics