Abstract
Single-subject research requires repeated, trustworthy measurement of dependent variables and repeated manipulation of one or more independent variables to establish lawful relationships between the dependent and independent variables and to discredit alternative explanations for that relationship. Single-subject researchers intensively study individuals’ actions under two or more experimentally controlled conditions; usually behavior, or the product of behavior, is the dependent variable, and presence or absence of an experimentally controlled condition is the independent variable. To judge whether a relationship between the independent and dependent variables exists, the investigator inspects the data visually. These characteristics are shared by the various designs typically discussed in texts on single-subject research methodology (e.g., Johnston & Pennypacker, 1993; Kazdin, 1982; Tawney & Gast, 1984).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Baer, D.M. (1978). Perhaps it would be better not to know everything. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 10, 167–172.
Baer, D.M., Wolf, M.M., & Risley, T.R. (1968). Some current dimensions of applied behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 91–97.
Barlow, D.H., Hayes, S.C., & Nelson, R.O. (1984). The scientist practitioner: Research and accountability in clinical and educational settings. New York: Pergamon Press.
Billingsley, F., White, O.R., & Munson, R. (1980). Procedural reliability: A rationale and an example. Behavioral Assessment, 2, 229–241.
Birnbrauer, J.S., Peterson, C.R., & Solnick, J.V. (1974). Design and interpretation of studies of single subjects. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 79, 191–203.
Bryan, T., Bay, M., Lopez-Reyna, N., & Donohue, M. (1991). Characteristics of students with learning disabilities: The extant database and its implications for educational programs. In J.W. Lloyd, N.N. Singh, & A.C. Repp (Eds.), The regular education initiative: Alternative perspectives on concepts, issues, and models (pp. 113–131). Sycamore, IL: Sycamore.
Campbell, D.T. & Stanley, J.C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Boston: Houghton.
DeProspero, A. & Cohen, S. (1979). Inconsistent visual analyses of intrasubject data. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 573–579.
Feagans, L.V., Short, E.J., & Meltzer, L.J. (Eds.). (1991). Subtypes of learning disabilities: Theoretical perspectives and research. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Gallagher, J.J. (1986). Learning disabilities and special education: A critique. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 19, 595–601.
Gast, D.L. & Wolery, M. (1988). Parallel treatments design: A nested single subject design for comparing instructional procedures. Education and Treatment of Children, 11, 270–285.
Graden, J.L., Casey, A., & Christenson, S.L. (1985). Implementing a preferral intervention system: Part I: The model. Exceptional Children, 51, 487–496.
Hains, A.H. & Baer, D.M. (1989). Interaction effects on multielement designs: Inevitable, desirable, and ignorable. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 22, 57–69.
Hallahan, D.P., Kauffman, J.M., & Lloyd, J.W. (1985). Introduction to learning disabilities (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Hammill, D.D., Leigh, J.E., McNutt, G., & Larsen, S.C. (1981). A new definition of learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 4, 336–342.
Haring, N.G., Lovitt, T.C., Easton, M.D., & Hansen, C.L. (1978). The fourth R: Research in the classroom. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.
Harris, K.R. & Graham, S. (1985). Improving learning disabled students’ composition skills: A self-control strategy training approach. Learning Disability Quarterly, 8, 27–36.
Hayes, S.C., Rincover, A., & Solnick, J.V. (1980). The technical drift of applied behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 13, 275–285.
Johnson, M.S. & Bailey, J.S. (1977). The modification of leisure behavior in a half way house for retarded women. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 10, 273–282.
Johnston, J.M. & Pennypacker, H.S. (1993). Strategies and tactics of human behavioral research (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Jones, R.R., Weinrott, M.R., & Vaught, R.S. (1978). Effects of serial dependency on the agreement between visual and statistical inferences. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 277–284.
Kavale, K.A. & Forness, S.R. (1987). The far side of heterogeneity: A critical analysis of empirical subtyping research in learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 20, 374–382.
Kavanaugh, J.F. & Truss, T.J., Jr. (Eds.). (1988). Learning disabilities: Proceedings of the national conference. Parkton, MD: York Press.
Kazdin, A.E. (1982). Single-case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings. New York: Oxford University Press.
Kratochwill, T.R. (Ed.). (1978). Single-subject research: Strategies for evaluating change. New York: Academic Press.
Kratochwill, T.R. & Levin, J.R. (Eds.). (1992). Single-case research design and analysis: New directions for psychology and education. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Lahey, B.B. (1976). Behavior modification with learning disabilities and related problems. In M. Hersen, R. Eisler, & P. Miller (Eds.), Progress in behavior modification (Vol. 3, pp. 173–205). New York: Academic Press.
Lloyd, J.W. (1988). Direct academic interventions in learning disabilities. In M.C. Wang, M.C. Reynolds, & H.J. Walberg (Eds.), The Handbook of special education: Research and practice (pp. 345–366). London: Pergamon Press.
Lloyd, J.W., Bateman, D.F., Landrum, T.J., & Hallahan, D.P. (1989). Self-recording of attention versus productivity. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 22, 315–323.
Lovitt, T.C. (1975). Applied behavior analysis and learning disabilities: Part 1: Characteristics of ABA, general recommendations, and methodological limitations. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 8, 432–443.
Lovitt, T.C. (1977). In spite of my resistance I’ve learned from children. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.
Lovitt, T.C. & Jenkins, J.R. (1979). Learning disabilities research: Defining populations. Learning Disability Quarterly, 2, 46–50.
McGonigle, J.J., Rojahn, J., Dixon, J., & Strain, P.S. (1987). Multiple treatment interference in the alternating treatments design as a function of the intercomponent interval length. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 7, 649–653.
McKinney, J.D. (1984). The search for subtypes of specific learning disability. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 17, 43–50.
Ottenbacher, K.J. (1990). When is a picture worth a thousand p values? A comparison of visual and quantitative methods to analyze single subject data. Journal of Special Education, 23, 436–449.
Poling, A. & Grossett, D. (1986). Basic research designs in applied behavior analysis. In A. Poling & R.W. Fuqua (Eds.), Research methods in applied behavior analysis: Issues and advances (pp. 7–28). New York: Plenum Press.
Repp, A.C. & Lloyd, J. (1980). Evaluating educational changes with single-subject designs. In J. Gottlieb (Ed.), Educating mentally retarded persons in the mainstream (pp. 73–105). Baltimore: University Park Press.
Rose, T.L. (1985). The effects of two prepractice procedures on oral reading. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 17, 544–548.
Rose, T.L., Koorland, M.A., & Epstein, M.E. (1982). A review of applied behavior analysis interventions with learning disabled children. Education and Treatment of Children, 5, 41–58.
Rusch, F.R. & Kazdin, A.E. (1981). Toward a methodology of withdrawal designs for the assessment of response maintenance. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 14, 131–140.
Scruggs, T.E., Mastropieri, M.A., & Casto, G. (1987). The quantitative synthesis of single-subject research: Methodology and validation. Remedial and Special Education, 8(2), 43–48.
Shapiro, E.S., Kazdin, A.E., & McGonigle, J.J. (1982). Multiple-treatment interference in the simultaneous- or alternating-treatments design. Behavioral Assessment, 4, 105–115.
Sidman, M. (1960). Tactics of scientific research: Evaluating experimental data in psychology. New York: Basic Books.
Sindelar, P.R., Rosenburg, M.S., & Wilson, R.J. (1985). An adapted alternating treatments design for instructional research. Education and Treatment of Children, 8, 67–76.
Singh, N.N., Deitz, D.E.D., & Singh, J. (1992). Behavioral approaches. In N.N. Singh & I.L. Beale (Eds.), Learning disabilities: Nature, theory, and treatment (pp. 375–414). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Strain, P.S. & Kerr, M.M. (1981). Modifying children’s social withdrawal: Issues in assessment and clinical intervention. In M. Hersen, R.M. Eisler, & P.M. Miller (Eds.), Progress in behavior modification (Vol. 11, pp. 203–248). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Tawney, J.W. & Gast, D.L. (1984). Single subject research in special education. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.
Thackwray, D., Meyers, A., Schlesser, R., & Cohen, R. (1985). Achieving generalization with general versus specific self-instructions: Effects on academically deficient children. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 9, 291–308.
Thorpe, H.W., Chiang, B., & Darch, C.B. (1981). Programming generalization when mainstreaming exceptional children. Journal of Special Education Technology, 4, 15–23.
White, D.M., Rusch, F.R., Kazdin, A.E., & Hartmann, D.P. (1989). Applications of meta analysis in individual-subject research. Behavioral Assessment, 11, 281–296.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1994 Springer-Verlag New York Inc.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lloyd, J.W., Tankersley, M., Talbott, E. (1994). Using Single-Subject Research Methodology to Study Learning Disabilities. In: Vaughn, S., Bos, C.S. (eds) Research Issues in Learning Disabilities. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-8345-1_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-8345-1_9
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-8347-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-8345-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive