Skip to main content

Cognitive Strategy Instruction: Methodological Issues and Guidelines in Conducting Research

  • Chapter
Book cover Research Issues in Learning Disabilities

Abstract

An important by-product of the cognitive revolution in education and psychology has been the application of cognitive instructional procedures to a wide range of problems experienced by children. These approaches have been used to help children deal with anger, aggression, anxiety, depression, hyperactivity, impulsivity, chronic illness, and interpersonal relations (see Hughes & Hall, 1989; Kendall, 1991). There has also been considerable interest in the role of cognitive strategy instruction in academic learning, particularly in terms of promoting the academic progress of students with severe learning problems. Entire issues of special education journals have been devoted to this topic (e.g., October, 1986 Exceptional Children; Winter, 1989 Learning Disability Quarterly), and studies on strategy instruction are common fare in journals within the field of learning disabilities (LD). Enough research has been undertaken so that at least one group of investigators has developed and marketed a strategy-based curriculum (cf. Deshler & Schumaker, 1986).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bjorklund, D. (1990). Children’s strategies: Contemporary views of cognitive development. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A.L. & Campione, J.C. (1990). Interactive learning environments and the teaching of science and mathematics. In M. Gardner, J. Greens, F. Reif, A. Schoenfeld, A. di Sessa, & E. Stage (Eds.), Toward a scientific practice of science education (pp. 111–139). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A.L., Campione, J.C., & Day, J.D. (1981). Learning to learn: On training students to learn from tests. Educational Researcher, 10, 14–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brownell, K. & Jeffery, R. (1987). Improving long-term weight loss: Pushing the limits of treatment. Behavior Therapy, 18, 353–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Case, L., Harris, K.R., & Graham, S. (1992). Improving the mathematical problem solving skills of students with learning disabilities: Self-instructional strategy development. Journal of Special Education, 26, 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deshler, D.D. & Schumaker, J.B. (1986). Learning strategies: An instructional alternative for low-achieving adolescents. Exceptional Children, 52, 583–590.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Englert, C.S., Raphael, T.E., Anderson, L.M., Anthony, H.M., Stevens, D.D., & Fear, K. (1991). Making writing strategies and self-talk visible: Cognitive strategy instruction in writing in regular and special education classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 28, 337–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garner, R. & Alexander, P.A. (1989). Metacognition: Answered and unanswered questions. Educational Psychologist, 24, 143–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glasgow, R. & Lichtenstein, E. (1987). Long-term effects of behavioral smoking cessation interventions. Behavior Therapy, 18, 297–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, S. (1989). Strategy instruction in mathematics. Learning Disability Quarterly, 12, 43–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, S. & Harris, K.R. (1989a). Cognitive training: Implications for written language. In J. Hughes & R. Hall (Eds.), Cognitive behavioral psychology in the schools: A comprehensive handbook (pp. 247–279). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, S. & Harris, K.R. (1989b). A components analysis of cognitive strategy instruction: Effects on learning disabled students’ compositions and self-efficacy. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 353–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, S. & Harris, K.R. (1992). Teaching writing strategies to students with learning disorders: Issues and recommendations. In L. Meltzer (Ed.), Strategy and assessment and instruction for students with learning disabilities (pp. 271–292). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, S., Harris, K.R., MacArthur, C., & Schwartz, S. (1991). Writing and writing instruction with students with learning disabilities: A review of a program of research. Learning Disability Quarterly, 14, 89–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, S., MacArthur, C., Schwartz, S., & Voth, T. (1992). Improving the compositions of students with learning disabilities using a strategy involving product and process goal setting. Exceptional Children, 58, 322–334.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, K.R. (1982). Cognitive-behavior modification: Application with exceptional students. Focus on Exceptional Children, 15, 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, K.R. (1985). Conceptual, methodological, and clinical issues in cognitive-behavioral assessment. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 13, 373–390.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, K.R. (1990). Developing self-regulated learners: The role of private speech and self-instructions. Educational Psychologist, 25, 35–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, K.R. & Graham, S. (1992a). Helping young writers master the craft: Strategy instruction and self-regulation in the writing process. Cambridge: Brook-line Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, K.R. & Graham, S. (1992b). Self-regulated strategy development: A part of the writing process. In M. Pressley, K.R. Harris, & J. Guthrie (Eds.), Promoting academic competence and literacy: Cognitive research and instructional innovation (pp. 277–309). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, K.R., Graham, S., & Freeman, S. (1988). Effects of strategy training on metamemory among learning disabled students. Exceptional Children, 54, 332–338.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, K.R., Graham, S., & Pressley, M. (1992). Cognitive behavioral approaches in reading and written language: Developing self-regulated learners. In N.N. Singh & I.L. Beale (Eds.), Learning disabilities: Nature, theory, and treatment (pp. 415–451). New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, K.R., Preller, D., & Graham, S. (1990). Acceptability of cognitive-behavioral and behavioral interventions among teachers. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 14, 573–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, K.R. & Pressley, M. (1991). The nature of cognitive strategy instruction: Interactive strategy construction. Exceptional Children, 57, 392–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, J. & Hall, R. (1989). Cognitive behavioral psychology in the schools: A comprehensive handbook. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, N.C. (1989). The maintenance of treatment gains following social learning-based marital therapy. Behavior Therapy, 20, 325–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kendall, P. (1989). The generalization and maintenance of behavior change: Comments, considerations, and the “no-cure” criticism. Behavior Therapy, 20, 357–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kendall, P. (1991). Child and adolescent therapy: Cognitive-behavioral procedures. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lysynchuk, L., Pressley, M., Ailly, H., Smith, M., & Cake, H. (1989). A methodological analysis of experimental studies of comprehension strategy instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 24, 458–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meichenbaum, D. (1977). Cognitive behavior modification: An integrative approach. NY: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Sullivan, J. & Pressley, M. (1984). Completeness of instruction and strategy transfer. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 38, 275–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palincsar, A.S. (1986). The role of dialogue in providing scaffolded instruction. Educational Psychologist, 21 (1 & 2), 73–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pressley, M., Goodchild, F., Fleet, J., Zajchowski, R., & Evans, E. (1989). The challenges of classroom strategy instruction. Elementary School Journal, 89, 301–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pressley, M., Harris, K., & Marks, M. (1992). But good strategy instructors are constructivists!! Educational Psychology Review, 4, 3–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pressley, M., Johnson, C., Symons, S., McGoldrick, J., & Kurita, J. (1989). Strategies that improve memory and reading comprehension of what is read. Elementary School Journal, 90, 3–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pressley, M., Snyder, B., & Cariglia-Bull, T. (1987). How can good strategy use be taught to children: Evaluation of six alternative approaches. In S. Cormier & J. Hagman (Eds.), Transfer of learning: Contemporary research and application. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pressley, M., Symons, S., Snyder, B., & Carigulia-Bull, T. (1989). Strategy instruction research comes of age. Learning Disability Quarterly, 12, 16–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pressley, M., Woloshyn, V., Lysynchuk, L., Martin, V., Wood, E., & Willough-by, T. (1990). A primer of research on cognitive strategy instruction: The important issues and how to address them. Educational Psychology Review, 2, 1–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer, R., Graham, S., & Harris, K.R. (1992). Direct teaching, strategy instruction, and strategy instruction with explicit self-regulation: Effects on learning disabled students’ composition skills and self-efficacy. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 340–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumaker, J., Deshler, D., Alley, G., & Warner, M. (1983). Toward the development of an intervention model for learning disabled adolescents: The University of Kansas Institute. Exceptional Education Quarterly, 4, 45–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokes, T. & Osnes, P. (1989). An operant pursuit of generalization. Behavior Therapy, 18, 353–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. (1978). The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, B.Y.L., Harris, K.R., & Graham, S. (1991). Cognitive-behavioral procedures: Academic applications with students with learning disabilities. In P.C. Kendall (Ed.), Child and adolescent therapy: Cognitive-behavioral procedures (pp. 245–275). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1994 Springer-Verlag New York Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Graham, S., Harris, K.R. (1994). Cognitive Strategy Instruction: Methodological Issues and Guidelines in Conducting Research. In: Vaughn, S., Bos, C.S. (eds) Research Issues in Learning Disabilities. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-8345-1_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-8345-1_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-8347-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-8345-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics