Advertisement

Naturally Occurring Perceptions of Control: A Model of Bounded Flexibility

Chapter

Abstract

The bulk of the research on perceived control indicates that we feel better about ourselves, are physically healthier, perform better on cognitive and manual tasks, cope better with adversity, and are better able to make desired behavioral changes if we have a sense of personal control (Thompson & Spacapan, 1991). Given these positive effects, it is not surprising that individuals are motivated to have control and tend to overestimate their abilities to influence events (Alloy & Abramson, 1979). However, it cannot be assumed that the motive to have control is without limit or disadvantage. For example, in “low-control” situations in which there are fewer opportunities for exercising effective control and increased likelihood that control perceptions will be disconfirmed, beliefs in personal control may not be beneficial and individuals may not overestimate their control. Not much is known about the motivation to believe that you have control when people are in life circumstances that limit the actual control available to them.

Keywords

Psychological Adjustment Personal Control Irrational Belief Control Belief Dispositional Optimism 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alloy, L.B. & Abramson, L.Y. (1979). Judgment of contingency in depressed and nondepressed students: Sadder but wiser? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 108, 441–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alloy, L.B. & Tabachnik, N. (1984). Assessment of covariation by humans and animals: The joint influence of prior expectations and current situational information. Psychological Review, 91, 112–149.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baltes, M.M. & Baltes, P.B. (1986). The psychology of control and aging. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  4. deCharms, R. (1968). Personal causation: The internal affective determinants of behavior. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  5. Ellis, A. (1977). The basic clinical theory of rational-emotive therapy. In A. Ellis & R. Grieger (Eds.), Handbook of rational-emotive therapy (pp. 3–34). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  6. Ende, J., Kazis, L., Ash, A., & Moskowitz, M.A. (1989). Measuring patients’ desire for autonomy: Decision making and information-seeking preferences among medical patients. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 4, 23–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Folkman, S. (1984). Personal control and stress and coping processes: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 839–852.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jones, E.E. & Gerard, H.B. (1967). Foundations of social psychology. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  10. Lachman, M.E. (1991). Perceived control over memory aging: Developmental and intervention perspectives. Journal of Social Issues, 47(4), 159–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Langer, E.J. (1975). The illusion of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 311–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Langer, E.J. & Perlmuter, L.C. (1982). The effects of behavioral monitoring on the perception of control. Clinical Gerontologist, 1, 37–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Langer, E.J. & Roth, J. (1975). Heads I win, tails it’s chance: The illusion of control as a function of the sequence of outcomes in a purely chance task. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 951–955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Malouff, J.M. & Schutte, N.S. (1986). Development and validation of a measure of irrational beliefs. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 54, 860–862.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Remondet, J.H. & Hansson, R.O. (1991). Job-related threats to control among older employees. Journal of Social Issues, 47(4), 129-141.Google Scholar
  16. Rothbaum, F., Weisz, J.R., & Snyder, S.S. (1982). Changing the world and changing the self: A two-process model of perceived control. Journal of Personality and Social Personality, 42, 5–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Scheier, M.F. & Carver, C.S. (1985). Optimism, coping, and health: Assessment and implications of generalized outcome expectancies. Health Psychology, 4, 219–247.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Simonton, O.C., Matthews-Simonton, S., & Creighton, J. (1978). Getting well again. Los Angeles: J.P. Tarcher, Inc.Google Scholar
  19. Taylor, S.E. (1979). Hospital patient behavior: Reactance, helplessness, or control? Journal of Social Issues, 35, 156–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Taylor, S.E. (1983). Adjustment to threatening events: A theory of cognitive adaptation. American Psychologist, 38, 1161–1173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Taylor, S.E. & Brown, J.D. (1988). Illusion and well-being: A social psychological perspective on mental health. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 193–210.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Thompson, S.C., Cheek, P.R., & Graham, M.A. (1988). The other side of perceived control: Disadvantages and negative effects. In S. Spacapan & S. Oskamp (Eds.), The social psychology of health (pp. 69–93). Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  23. Thompson, S.C., Pitts, J., & Schwankovsky, L. (1991). Preferences for involvement in medical decision making: Personal and situational influences. Manuscript under review.Google Scholar
  24. Thompson, S.C. & Sobolew-Shubin, A. (in press). Perceptions of overprotection in ill adults. Journal of Applied Social Psychology.Google Scholar
  25. Thompson, S.C., Sobolew-Shubin, A., Galbraith, M.E., Schwankovsky, L., & Cruzen, D. (1993). Maintaining peceptions of control: Finding perceived control in low-control circumstances. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 293–304.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Thompson, S.C., Sobolew-Shubin, A., Graham, M., & Janigian, A.S. (1989). Psychosocial adjustment following a stroke. Social Science and Medicine, 28, 239–247.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Thompson, S.C. & Spacapan, S. (1991). Perceptions of control in vulnerable populations. Journal of Social Issues, 47(4), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Watson, M., Greer, S., Pruyn, J., & Van der Borne, B. (1990). Locus of control and adjustment to cancer. Psychological Reports, 66, 39–48.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Weary, G., Marsh, K.L., Gleicher, F., & Edwards, J.A. (in press). Depression, control motivation, and the processing of information about others. In G. Weary, F. Gleicher, & K.L. Marsh (Eds.), Control motivation and social cognition. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  30. Weinstein, N.D. (1980). Unrealistic optimism about future life events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 806–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. White, R.W. (1959). Motivation reconsidered: The concept of competence. Psychological Review, 66, 297–333.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wortman, C.B. & Brehm, J.W. (1975). Responses to uncontrollable outcomes: An integration of reactance theory and the learned helplessness model. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 8, pp. 278–336). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. 1993

Authors and Affiliations

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations